The Washington Post reported Monday evening that IG Michael Horowitz, an Obama administration appointee,
had concluded that there was, in fact, sufficient evidence to justify what Barr earlier called “spying”
on the campaign.
Barr reportedly disagreed, though a spokesperson for the DOJ dismissed reports of a dispute between Barr
and Horowitz: “Rather than speculating, people should read the report for themselves next week,” she said.
Horowitz was criticized for his 2018 report on how the FBI handled the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s
illicit email server, in which he found that officials mishandled the investigation but that political bias
was not the reason.
Oh boy that is not what I expected.
had concluded that there was, in fact, sufficient evidence to justify what Barr earlier called “spying”
on the campaign.
Barr reportedly disagreed, though a spokesperson for the DOJ dismissed reports of a dispute between Barr
and Horowitz: “Rather than speculating, people should read the report for themselves next week,” she said.
Horowitz was criticized for his 2018 report on how the FBI handled the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s
illicit email server, in which he found that officials mishandled the investigation but that political bias
was not the reason.
Oh boy that is not what I expected.