Bits and peaces start to emerge from the Horowitz report.

[Willie99]

I'm curious. What are you going to say when 6 months from now there are no indictments.
Are you still going to give Barr & Durham a pass?

Do I really need to answer your rhetorical question?

I have been saying all along "let them do their job". Has that happened yet? When that happens, then I can no longer say wait until it happens, A?

I know my friend, you're an instant gratification guy . I get it. But I'm a process guy, not moved by press reports, just letting time do it's thing

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Do I really need to answer your rhetorical question?

I have been saying all along "let them do their job". Has that happened yet? When that happens, then I can no longer say wait until it happens, A?

I know my friend, you're an instant gratification guy . I get it. But I'm a process guy, not moved by press reports, just letting time do it's thing

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Nice spin but you still haven't answered the question. And I didn't think it was rhetorical. [/FONT]

 

[REDEYE]

I'm curious. What are you going to say when 6 months from now there are no indictments.
Are you still going to give Barr & Durham a pass?

So in your mind , Barr and Durham aren't going to hand out indictments ?

 

[Dave007inVegas]

So in your mind , Barr and Durham aren't going to hand out indictments ?

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Oh I think they'll hand out indictments, it's just a matter of when.

I'm more interested in who gets indicted and how many. If it's not
the likes of Comey, McCabe and the Granny to name a few then I'll
just swollow me own shit and STFU.[/FONT]

 

[rolltide]

“The DNC pays for the Steele dossier, solicits the Steele dossier, and then gets the Federal Bureau of Investigation to go get FISA warrants, surveil an American citizen, and surveil a presidential campaign all on the basis of this manufactured garbage that they paid for. I mean that’s extraordinary," he complained. "That has got to be a first time in history. In fact, let me just ask you, Mr. Horowitz, are you aware ever of another presidential campaign being targeted by the FBI like the Trump campaign was?”

"To me, this is the untold story of the 2016 campaign," continued Hawley. "I don't know who at the DNC hatched this, but I suppose they ought to take a victory lap, but certainly they should be remembered for it; to get the FBI to pursue surveillance of a rival presidential campaign and then into the newly elected president's term I think is just extraordinary."

Hawley then grilled Horowitz about why the criminals at the FBI involved in this are still employed. No one knows. Hawley closed with this bombshell: "I think the collusion here was between the DNC and the FBI."​

​

 

[Willie99]

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Nice spin but you still haven't answered the question. And I didn't think it was rhetorical. [/FONT]

Actually, I did still answer your question. After their work is done, how can I suggest we have to wait until they complete their work?

If they don't indict people, then I trust there's just not enough evidence to prosecute.

Either that or they'd being taking the road Nixon took in 1960 when said he didn't want to divide the country with a recount. But things were different then, and that horse has left the barn.

Indictments are coming

 

[BuzzKill]

 

[BuzzKill]

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Actually, I did still answer your question. After their work is done, how can I suggest we have to wait until they complete their work?

If they don't indict people, then I trust there's just not enough evidence to prosecute.

Either that or they'd being taking the road Nixon took in 1960 when said he didn't want to divide the country with a recount. But things were different then, and that horse has left the barn.

Indictments are coming

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]With all that we know I can't believe you just wrote that.[/FONT]

 

[rolltide]

Actually, I did still answer your question. After their work is done, how can I suggest we have to wait until they complete their work?

If they don't indict people, then I trust there's just not enough evidence to prosecute.

Either that or they'd being taking the road Nixon took in 1960 when said he didn't want to divide the country with a recount. But things were different then, and that horse has left the barn.

Indictments are coming

i definitely need to move to your world if you truly believe that untouchable politicians, CIA, FBI, and DOJ leaders must be innocent because they weren't prosecuted for their crimes

 

[Willie99]

With all that we know I can't believe you just wrote that.

i definitely need to move to your world if you truly believe that untouchable politicians, CIA, FBI, and DOJ leaders must be innocent because they weren't prosecuted for their crimes

What do youse and I really know?

We think more, we raise more questions, we try to apply logic as opposed to the circus seals, butt at the end of the day we really don't know everything

I'm a nuanced kinda of guy, I choose my words wisely leaving room for some misunderstanding or misinterpretation when talking seriously about legal matters

 

[Dave007inVegas]

What do youse and I really know?

We think more, we raise more questions, we try to apply logic as opposed to the circus seals, butt at the end of the day we really don't know everything

I'm a nuanced kinda of guy, I choose my words wisely leaving room for some misunderstanding or misinterpretation when talking seriously about legal matters

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]We know that the Granny used an unsecure server and we know Comey let her slide.

We know that Rosenstein signed off on a renewal for a FISA warrant against Carter Page
based on the unverified Steele dossier.

We know that Comey, McCabe and Yates signed FISA surveillance warrants to spy on Trump campaign.

I could go on but I won't. That alone could keep Barr a busy little beaver for quite awhile.

That's 5 slam dunk indictments. No grey areas just guilty as shit.

When Barr announces his indictments the list better be long and contain the above and others.[/FONT]

 

[SgtLanquel]

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]We know that the Granny used an unsecure server and we know Comey let her slide.

We know that Rosenstein signed off on a renewal for a FISA warrant against Carter Page
based on the unverified Steele dossier.

We know that Comey, McCabe and Yates signed FISA surveillance warrants to spy on Trump campaign.

I could go on but I won't. That alone could keep Barr a busy little beaver for quite awhile.

That's 5 slam dunk indictments. No grey areas just guilty as shit.

When Barr announces his indictments the list better be long and contain the above and others.[/FONT]

What we actually know is that in addition to HillaryC using an unsecured server, Tiny has been conducting official domestic & foreign policy business using his unsecured personal cell phone for the past 35 months

Rosenstein did not sign off on the extensions of the Page-related FISA warrants - that was a federal judge....three separate times

The Comey-led FBI did not serve warrants to surveil the "Trump campaign". They served warrants to surveil Carter Page, GeorgeP and Paul Manafort. And Trump then happily hired all three even with that level of law enforcement scrutiny.

WILLIE stated it with rueful accuracy - the prevalent reason Barr has not brought indictments against any of your hated public figures is because he frankly cannot produce sufficient evidence of any federal crimes

But please don't let me stop you from fantasizing about Hillary in handcuffs. It's pretty fucking kinky, but guys our age probably need more kinks

 

[Willie99]

DESTROYED, EVERYTHING THEY THINK IS BEING DESTROYED

it's all over but the crying, the only thing besides lying the circus seals are good at

 

[BuzzKill]

 

[BuzzKill]

 

[BuzzKill]

 

[SheriffJoe]

 

[Dave007inVegas]

What we actually know is that in addition to HillaryC using an unsecured server, Tiny has been conducting official domestic & foreign policy business using his unsecured personal cell phone for the past 35 months

Rosenstein did not sign off on the extensions of the Page-related FISA warrants - that was a federal judge....three separate times

The Comey-led FBI did not serve warrants to surveil the "Trump campaign". They served warrants to surveil Carter Page, GeorgeP and Paul Manafort. And Trump then happily hired all three even with that level of law enforcement scrutiny.

WILLIE stated it with rueful accuracy - the prevalent reason Barr has not brought indictments against any of your hated public figures is because he frankly cannot produce sufficient evidence of any federal crimes

But please don't let me stop you from fantasizing about Hillary in handcuffs. It's pretty fucking kinky, but guys our age probably need more kinks

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]You are the Eric Swalwell of the Rx.[/FONT]

 

[SheriffJoe]