BetJamaica cancelled the bets on PSG

Search

New member
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
9,069
Tokens
Books have more information than players. We are always taken advantage of. Not sure why these bets should be cancelled.

IS
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
22,529
Tokens
Also want to say that 5dimes paid out the winning side even at sub par value (ie before the big move) they did not cancel these at half time

they paid out + 1/2 +143 a HORRIBLE PRICE compared to when this line was so called "fixed" before kickoff.

Bet Jam really screwed this one up.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
The 0-0 argument only goes to the extent that BJM is saying that IF there were a team leading they would not have cancelled the bets. In other words with the score being nil they still felt there was SOME fairness involved to the players who bet the game (as if the game had not started).. We all understand that 0-0 IS a score but not one where anyone laying the half goal was taken advantage of by the cancelling. By laying the half goal I mean with 3 way betting players betting PSG or Marseilles had to win outright or lose.

Sure this would be much messier if PSG had won, but I will go on record here based on past experience with Scotty -- all players would have been paid.

Again a most unfortunate occurance and one I am certain everyone at BJM regrets.


wil..
 

Smell like "lemon juice and Pledge furniture clean
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
6,922
Tokens
5teamparlay said:
I didn't bet the game there, but do have an account there. 0-0 is a score IMO.

Especially on a 3 way line where ties don't push.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
22,529
Tokens
wil thanks for getting the explaination out there.

That is great

I realize that the Rx would have insisted in a reverse decesion if the bet had actually won or taken betJAmaica down if they did not.

so really it was a win win win for the players. a no lose for the players a WIN or a push wager. wish I had that bet down at BJ and not BT now.
 

zee

New member
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
949
Tokens
The 0-0 argument only goes to the extent that BJM is saying that IF there were a team leading they would not have cancelled the bets.

Let's not get ridiculous, shall we? Football is not NFL. A tied game at the end of a regular time is exactly that, a tied game. 0:0 IS a result. The book is wrong, as there are no players harmed, you can leave it at that. Still, they better not pull this shit again in the future. As said about 10 times on the thread - soccer is an action wager. You don't back Listed 11, you back a TEAM.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Zee, take a look at the new thread I just posted on the matter. BJM understands this, an error was made. These things can happen from time to time. The match had some very unusual circumstances (like all wagers on one side - go figure)..



wilheim.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,675
Messages
13,461,691
Members
99,485
Latest member
giaoduc783
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com