All Things, Trayvon Martin / George Zimmerman

Search
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
Yes he certainly could of, but nobody is coming forward with that yet that we know of. It's going to get interesting. Zimmerman may have to be in hiding for the rest of his life, IDK, I think the guy will get taken out eventually, not that I am hoping for that, but when you hear people like Tyson and Barkley promoting violence towards the guy, then I think someone will take care of him. I just don't understand what Z was thinking that night, he was looking for trouble, that's a lot of balls, dumb choice
Yea, his life is gonna be hell no matter what the outcome is in this. I don't think we will ever know exactly what happened unless Z testifies and tells the truth and we believe him. I think he will have to testify since he is the only one who knows exactly what happened during that minute or so before the 1st witness saw them on the ground. I doubt with the evidence they have they will convict him unless they can somehow prove that he did start the fight, if in fact he did. But I don't see how they can prove it. But like I said, whether he goes to jail or not, his life will be hell either way...
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
You do realize right that sometimes people get convicted of murder and they don't even find a body? Sometimes people are convicted and nobody witnessed the crime? Happens each day in America. It's called investigating the incident, questioning witnesses, examining evidence and coming to a conclusion based on years of experience in law enforcement.

How do the cops know? Because all of Zimmerman's wounds are defensive wounds and all of Martin's wounds are offensive wounds and witnesses say they saw him on top of him.

Just keep calling me names when you get flustered. You show your true colors. When you get angry, call a guy names and stupid. It's so predictable.

I'm not in the least bit angry, just incredulous,and why in the world would I be flustered? You're a nitwit, you just don't address things that you have no response to: for the umpteenth time, defensive or offensive wounds or who was on top of whom, do not prove who started things, only what the fight BECAME, you can try to ignore that till you grow a foot long dong, but it won't work. You've lied, repeatedly, by saying that Martin started it, when you have no idea of who started it. Repeating a lie dozens of times doesn't make the statement any less of a lie...
 

New member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
29,253
Tokens
LOL, I have Billhill on ignore but saw his post when you quoted him. If he honestly thinks they can prove Martin was on angel dust that night he is crazier than I thought, LOL. First off, the report said there were very small traces of THC in his system which means chances are it was not from that night but from days if not weeks earlier since marijuana can stay in your system for weeks. Secondly, THC is in marijuana, not angel dust,lol. Bill isnt a liar in this case, just misinformed. He probably has THC mixed up with PCP, which is what angel dust is. So that blows his theory that Martin was on some superdrug that night right out the window. Nice try though, lol.


Ministry of Cannabis - Angel Dust
This plant is a pure indica, to find the right parents for this lady we have selected and tested many individuals of the Kush family. This plant is very compact and it vegetates fast. The leaves are thicker than normal and the buds tend to be heavy. The effect is that typical stone of a pure indica, a strong body and mind relaxation, and it`s a consequence of the high level of thc and cbd.

Our laboratories have confirmed that the level of thc was 21,1% and the cbd was 0,4% on the sample that we gave them. We would like to test it again.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
I'm not in the least bit angry, just incredulous,and why in the world would I be flustered? You're a nitwit, you just don't address things that you have no response to: for the umpteenth time, defensive or offensive wounds or who was on top of whom, do not prove who started things, only what the fight BECAME, you can try to ignore that till you grow a foot long dong, but it won't work. You've lied, repeatedly, by saying that Martin started it, when you have no idea of who started it. Repeating a lie dozens of times doesn't make the statement any less of a lie...

And for the umpteenth time, the cops investigated the crime scene and determined Martin started the physical confrontation. I've lied huh? How is it a lie to post on here what the cops determined in their investigation? How is that a lie?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
And for the umpteenth time, the cops investigated the crime scene and determined Martin started the physical confrontation. I've lied huh? How is it a lie to post on here what the cops determined in their investigation? How is that a lie?

You have taken a massive beating now for a dozen or more pages. I would think your buddy zit would have thrown the towel in for you but I forget sometimes that he is a complete fool. You look like rocky after his first fight with apollo creed.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
And for the umpteenth time, the cops investigated the crime scene and determined Martin started the physical confrontation. I've lied huh? How is it a lie to post on here what the cops determined in their investigation? How is that a lie?

If you simply stated that the cops said, Zimmerman says that Martin started it, and, based on our thorough investigation(which didn't even include blood testing the shooter, though we were quick to run that test on the victim), we believe him, well, that would have been one thing. But you didn't say that, you said, Martin started it, period. There is no test currently available to determine such a thing, and, since the police weren't there when it happened, they have no way to determine that, and, by extension, neither do you. Therefore, your statement that you know definitely who started it was a lie. Any other questions?
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
And that's your answer. Consistent from the get go. Why do you dislike this Zimmerman guy so bad?
LOL, show me one post where I have not been completely neutral in this thing and have said that we don't know what happened. I do not dislike Zimmerman. How can I, I don't know the guy. I have never said anything negative towards Zimmerman except to say he should not have gotten out his car. That's the difference between you and me. You assume facts not in evidence and come to your own conclusion as to what happened. I am willing to wait until the facts come out at jury before deciding what the outcome should be. But it's very obvious that you dislike Martin. And he is the one who is dead in all of this.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
If you simply stated that the cops said, Zimmerman says that Martin started it, and, based on our thorough investigation(which didn't even include blood testing the shooter, though we were quick to run that test on the victim), we believe him, well, that would have been one thing. But you didn't say that, you said, Martin started it, period. There is no test currently available to determine such a thing, and, since the police weren't there when it happened, they have no way to determine that, and, by extension, neither do you. Therefore, your statement that you know definitely who started it was a lie. Any other questions?
LOL, you know how many times we have told him this and he still just not get it. I just can't figure out how this guys mind works.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
You have taken a massive beating now for a dozen or more pages. I would think your buddy zit would have thrown the towel in for you but I forget sometimes that he is a complete fool. You look like rocky after his first fight with apollo creed.

Martin got what he deserved. Want to be thug putting his hands on another human being. He is dead because he thought he was tough.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
LOL, show me one post where I have not been completely neutral in this thing and have said that we don't know what happened. I do not dislike Zimmerman. How can I, I don't know the guy. I have never said anything negative towards Zimmerman except to say he should not have gotten out his car. That's the difference between you and me. You assume facts not in evidence and come to your own conclusion as to what happened. I am willing to wait until the facts come out at jury before deciding what the outcome should be. But it's very obvious that you dislike Martin. And he is the one who is dead in all of this.

I could care less about the kid. You say Zimmerman shouldn't have gotten out of his car, I say Martin should've kept his hands to himself. Tried to be a tough guy and it ended his life.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
If you simply stated that the cops said, Zimmerman says that Martin started it, and, based on our thorough investigation(which didn't even include blood testing the shooter, though we were quick to run that test on the victim), we believe him, well, that would have been one thing. But you didn't say that, you said, Martin started it, period. There is no test currently available to determine such a thing, and, since the police weren't there when it happened, they have no way to determine that, and, by extension, neither do you. Therefore, your statement that you know definitely who started it was a lie. Any other questions?

Zimmerman was given a DNA and Voice Stress test at the PD. I believe Martin started it. The police say the same thing and the evidence says the same thing. If you don't think that's what happened, you are blind as a bat.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Zimmerman was given a DNA and Voice Stress test at the PD. I believe Martin started it. The police say the same thing and the evidence says the same thing. If you don't think that's what happened, you are blind as a bat.

You need to work on your reading skills, I didn't say a word about a DNA test. Zimmerman was NOT given a blood and alcohol test, and every law enforcement person that I saw interviewed roundly condemned that failure-and that wasn't their only blunder, not to mention their past history of abuse of authority(most notably a video showing a homeless guy being beaten by the son of a Sanford higher up. Despite video evidence, the son walked. Shocking!) Your referencing that police department as some sort of bastion of thoroughness and/or integrity shows just how clueless you are, the fact that the top 2 people in command were booted out ought to give you an indication of that, but, again, you're clueless-not to mention a liar. You didn't say "I believe" he started it, you said "He started it" and you can't know that.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,178
Tokens
I think Martin was trying to steal stuff or something and George called him on it. Then Martin got mad and started to clobber George in the head,face,nose and pee pee. George told Martin to stop it and he did not stop it. When Martin notices that George had a gun he tried to grab it, and missed, to his detriment. George is lucky to be alive after that tussel on the ground.

That's what I think may have happened!
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
I guess guys on this forum do not care if someone is following them at night in a vehicle and then gets out of that vehicle to continue the pursuit on foot. Kind of weird! I would think all these "manly" conservatives would bring out some whoop ass if someone did that to them. But I guess if it's a black kid, it's all good!
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Martin got what he deserved. Want to be thug putting his hands on another human being. He is dead because he thought he was tough.

Couldn’t agree more.

Martin was punk with no realistic future of becoming anything more than your run of the mill criminal.

He suffered from, “I’m a bad ass“ syndrome.

Picked a fight with the wrong guy and paid the ultimate price.

All I can say is, bummer for him.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Congrats enfeugo....the only thing worse than having video evidence that contradicts your beliefs is having dave007 agree with you. Once that happens you know you're wrong. Guy is a known idiot.

I think it was Zimmerman who picked the wrong guy...pussy was getting his ass beat and had to do what all pussies do when they can't handle themselves....reach for a gun. Punk ass pussy move for a guy who provoked a confrontation.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
I guess guys on this forum do not care if someone is following them at night in a vehicle and then gets out of that vehicle to continue the pursuit on foot. Kind of weird! I would think all these "manly" conservatives would bring out some whoop ass if someone did that to them. But I guess if it's a black kid, it's all good!

For the 80th time, guy walks up to you on the street doesn't mean you can punch him in the face. Had Martin not been killed, he would've been arrested for assault. Case closed. What next? And I'm still waiting for you to show what I said that is racist. These boards allow people to make many accusations but when they get called on it, the poster disappears.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
Congrats enfeugo....the only thing worse than having video evidence that contradicts your beliefs is having dave007 agree with you. Once that happens you know you're wrong. Guy is a known idiot.

I think it was Zimmerman who picked the wrong guy...pussy was getting his ass beat and had to do what all pussies do when they can't handle themselves....reach for a gun. Punk ass pussy move for a guy who provoked a confrontation.

Zimmerman picked the wrong guy? Isn't Martin dead? Seems clearly Martin tried to be tough with the wrong guy. 17-year-old punk ass drug addict got exactly what he deserved. I guess the positive in all of this is now his delinquent parents will make some money off his dead body. He was a thug and a wanna-be tough guy.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,483
Tokens
You need to work on your reading skills, I didn't say a word about a DNA test. Zimmerman was NOT given a blood and alcohol test, and every law enforcement person that I saw interviewed roundly condemned that failure-and that wasn't their only blunder, not to mention their past history of abuse of authority(most notably a video showing a homeless guy being beaten by the son of a Sanford higher up. Despite video evidence, the son walked. Shocking!) Your referencing that police department as some sort of bastion of thoroughness and/or integrity shows just how clueless you are, the fact that the top 2 people in command were booted out ought to give you an indication of that, but, again, you're clueless-not to mention a liar. You didn't say "I believe" he started it, you said "He started it" and you can't know that.

Martin punched Zimmerman. It's clear. Quit trying to twist the facts to suit your liberal stance on the matter. Martin punched him and then jumped on him and continued his ASSAULT. Evidence and witnesses all corroborate. He's dead for good reason. Suck it up and deal with it.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,134,950
Messages
13,821,593
Members
104,169
Latest member
scamproof
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com