If you simply stated that the cops said, Zimmerman says that Martin started it, and, based on our thorough investigation(which didn't even include blood testing the shooter, though we were quick to run that test on the victim), we believe him, well, that would have been one thing. But you didn't say that, you said, Martin started it, period. There is no test currently available to determine such a thing, and, since the police weren't there when it happened, they have no way to determine that, and, by extension, neither do you. Therefore, your statement that you know definitely who started it was a lie. Any other questions?