Please do not take this the wrong way, but are you totally crazy? Google? You actually use Google for this type of information? Are you seriously trying to tell me that a totally worthless QB like Tim Tebow is better than Andrew Luck? How about Manziel? Is he better than Marcus Marietta, or either one of the USC Heisman Trophy QB winners? Gee the next thing you will be telling me is that USC RB's like O.J. Simpson, Marcus Allen, and Reggie Bush (who received more 1st. place Heisman votes than any other player) are not any good either. You have a very odd definition of elite. To you, Elite means whomever YOU think is good. That is the only possible explanation that I can imagine for such an outrageous post. No offense, but it is rather obvious that you are new to this game. You are obviously a homer, and homers always end up on the losing side of the wagering spread sheets.
Your feeble attempt to belittle is quite amendable.
Google is a remarkable tool for gathering public opinion. That was why I used it - to see how others (general public, sports writers, etc.) viewed the best qb's of all time. The results (general consensus) speak for itself, not only has the sec produced many, many more elite qb's than usc and stanford, it isn't even close. Defend your position all you want, it won't change the facts and it damn sure won't change public opinion.
The rest of your post is pure rubbish. My reply was in regard to you saying usc and stanford had better qb's than the entire sec. You countered by bring up murderers, running backs and oregon qb's. Just like your advise on wagering, it isn't relevant.
Talk about wagering, one who believes you bet the same on each game knows nothing about betting. Or should I say, winning. Successful betters do their own handicapping and determine value for each game they play. Statistically, it is similar to a bell shaped curve in a normal distribution. The further your value is from the mean (vegas spread) the more value you have and better chance to win. If you have perceived value of 8 in one game and perceived value of 15 in another you adjust the amount you bet accordingly. Smart betters who do their homework and are good determining value win consistently. Those not good at determining value turn to touts, bet their favorite team or use some other ridiculous mean to determine which teams to play. It's easy for them and sometimes they win, but long term it is not a profitable proposition.
Then there are people who don't bet but claim they do. Like those who come up with some kind of magical proposition that doesn't exist- like betting the Washington team total over 8 when the line is really 10.