Imagine knowing you committed no crime, and your political enemies get to spin everything against you for going on three years and counting. It is criminal behavior on their part, it's treasonous. Of course he's mad, of course his words don't have the same meaning as what the fucking idiots have been spoon fed to regurgitate
Sessions was an asshole on multiple levels. Simply recusing himself and essentially handing his authority and talking points to people who pretended to be his friends shows his lack of judgement. Trump should have fired him that very moment
Trump's biggest crime in all of this? He was hoping his relationships with his AG would be similar to his predecessor. Eight-Years-of-Suck and his justice department walked hand in hand
Sessions was an asshole on multiple levels. Simply recusing himself and essentially handing his authority and talking points to people who pretended to be his friends shows his lack of judgement. Trump should have fired him that very moment
Trump's biggest crime in all of this? He was hoping his relationships with his AG would be similar to his predecessor. Eight-Years-of-Suck and his justice department walked hand in hand
Why do you keep insulting Chimps?
Here you go bootlicker
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obstru...p-may-have-obstructed-justice-mueller-report/
ointer:I see you didn’t even make it past the first sentence of the article. It’s not CBS job to interpret whether Trump obstructed or not, nor is it Barr’s. If I had to guess, that first line from the article has more to do with Barr’s summary than anything found in the Mueller report.
The actual contents of the report paint a much more damning picture of the presidents behavior, his attempts to obstruct, and in Muellers own words the president can be indicted for those crimes once he leaves office.
There’s enough out there to start impeachment hearings. Fortunately, as you know, elections have consequences and the Blue wave of 2018 is going to hold President Bitch
accountableFrom the report:
A possible remedy through impeachment for abuses of power **would not substitute for potential criminal liability after a President leaves office. Impeachment would remove a President from office, but would not address the underlying culpability of the conduct or serve the usual purposes of the criminal law**. Indeed, the Impeachment Judgment Clause recognizes that **criminal law plays an independent role in addressing an official’s conduct**, distinct from the political remedy of impeachment. See U.S. CONST. ART. l, § 3, cl. 7. Impeachment is also a drastic and rarely invoked remedy, and **Congress is not restricted to relying only on impeachment, rather than making criminal law applicable to a former President**, as OLC has recognized. A Sitting President’s Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution, 24 Op. O.L.C. at 255 (“Recognizing an immunity from prosecution for a sitting President would not preclude such prosecution once the President’s term is over or he is otherwise removed from office by resignation or impeachment.”).
A possible remedy through impeachment for abuses of power **would not substitute for potential criminal liability after a President leaves office. Impeachment would remove a President from office, but would not address the underlying culpability of the conduct or serve the usual purposes of the criminal law**. Indeed, the Impeachment Judgment Clause recognizes that **criminal law plays an independent role in addressing an official’s conduct**, distinct from the political remedy of impeachment. See U.S. CONST. ART. l, § 3, cl. 7. Impeachment is also a drastic and rarely invoked remedy, and **Congress is not restricted to relying only on impeachment, rather than making criminal law applicable to a former President**, as OLC has recognized. A Sitting President’s Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution, 24 Op. O.L.C. at 255 (“Recognizing an immunity from prosecution for a sitting President would not preclude such prosecution once the President’s term is over or he is otherwise removed from office by resignation or impeachment.”).
Facts:
President Trump did not fire anyone involved in the investigation
President Trump did not destroy any evidence.
President Trump did not end the investigation prematurely.
President Trump ordered senior WH staff to cooperate.
President Trump turned over millions of pages of documents.
President Trump took no actual obstructive acts.
President Trump did not fire anyone involved in the investigation
President Trump did not destroy any evidence.
President Trump did not end the investigation prematurely.
President Trump ordered senior WH staff to cooperate.
President Trump turned over millions of pages of documents.
President Trump took no actual obstructive acts.
