“Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my presidency. I’m fucked.”

Search

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,846
Tokens
Thats why I find it amazing this bullshit has gone on for as long as it has....

Because their target audience is the Dongers of this world, and that's no joke. He's not only an enabler, he's their life's blood
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,576
Tokens
I don't think that's a crime?

Obstruction of Justice though, that is a crime -- an impeachable crime. Remember when they impeached Clinton for it?


Also, I think you forgot to sign into your ghost account before replying to your own post. :):)

Good luck getting a charge
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,576
Tokens
I hear alot of documents will be dropped on to us coming soon...looking forward to it.. most will be sorry this poor excuse for a investigation even started
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
9,660
Tokens
Obstruction during an investigation of a crime that never happened

Some people are totally incapable of thinking

Bingo. Sad thing is a lot of people are sky screaming this. I just dont understand.

Economy is good.
USA isn't some pointless war.
Everyone has jobs.

Now Donnie needs to fix
Healthcare
Immigration laws
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
25,918
Tokens
I don't think that's a crime?

Obstruction of Justice though, that is a crime -- an impeachable crime. Remember when they impeached Clinton for it?


Also, I think you forgot to sign into your ghost account before replying to your own post. :):)

Lol...obstructing a made up crime.
Priceless
 

2009 RX Death Pool Champion
Joined
Apr 3, 2005
Messages
13,603
Tokens
It's actually funny everyone using this quote leaves out what he follows it with...

“Everyone tells me if you get one of these independent counsels it ruins your presidency. It takes years and years and I won’t be able to do anything.”

He is saying he will be unable to govern effectively...
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
It was written by 18 angry Democrat donors, stuffed with innuendo and reads like a political opo research folder, rather than a legal document citing actual legal statutes. There's just no there there - ZERO evidence to charge the President with anything, but just enough crumbs to keep the libtards throwing their coins into the "Impeach Drumpf!!!" wishing well.

Do you ever think for yourself or are you merely content with repeating everything our criminal president tweets?
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,461
Tokens
I hope the Dems proceed with impeachment proceedings. That will all but guarantee Trump gets reelected.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,469
Tokens
I have a wager with NFLTrends regarding any member of the Trump campaign and collusion with Russia.

The fact that you don't know you already lost is funny as hell.

What is it like walking around with a chimpanzee IQ, anyway?
 

Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2009
Messages
9,686
Tokens
It's actually funny everyone using this quote leaves out what he follows it with...

“Everyone tells me if you get one of these independent counsels it ruins your presidency. It takes years and years and I won’t be able to do anything.”

He is saying he will be unable to govern effectively...

Donger won't quote/reply this because its true and he knows it but it doesn't fit his agenda.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
I hope the Dems proceed with impeachment proceedings. That will all but guarantee Trump gets reelected.

The last time a president was impeached, that presidents party lost all 3 branches of govt in the very next election.

Careful what you wish for
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,469
Tokens
The last time a president was impeached, that presidents party lost all 3 branches of govt in the very next election.

Careful what you wish for

No, stupid shit, they didn't.

You made that up, just like you make up a lot of shit here.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
No, stupid shit, they didn't.

You made that up, just like you make up a lot of shit here.

Clinton impeached in 1998, Senate acquitted him in 1999.

2000 Election saw Bush defeat Gore

Senate control was maintained by Republicans who held on to 50 seats

House Control maintained by Republicans 221 seats to 211

Go ahead and Google 107th Congress and see for yourself. That is if your inbred hoof-hands can navigate a computer mouse and keyboard.

Braindead, mouthbreathing, know-nothings
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
Why did you only quote one sentence? Why didnt you quote the whole conversation of what he said on what he was talking about?

Was it:

A: The media only told you that part of the conversation?
B: You did it purposely, so it would be taken out of context to make it look like he was admitting guilt?

Which one was it?

What else did he say in that paragraph of the report that you left out?

(Im ready for the deflect and spin instead of just answering... or just ignoring these questions completely)
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,846
Tokens
Why are y'all trying to reason with a brick wall?
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
footnote from Mueller report... you tell me:

A possible remedy through impeachment for abuses of power **would not substitute for potential criminal liability after a President leaves office. Impeachment would remove a President from office, but would not address the underlying culpability of the conduct or serve the usual purposes of the criminal law**. Indeed, the Impeachment Judgment Clause recognizes that **criminal law plays an independent role in addressing an official’s conduct**, distinct from the political remedy of impeachment. See U.S. CONST. ART. l, § 3, cl. 7. Impeachment is also a drastic and rarely invoked remedy, and **Congress is not restricted to relying only on impeachment, rather than making criminal law applicable to a former President**, as OLC has recognized. A Sitting President’s Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution, 24 Op. O.L.C. at 255 (“Recognizing an immunity from prosecution for a sitting President would not preclude such prosecution once the President’s term is over or he is otherwise removed from office by resignation or impeachment.”).
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
44,850
Tokens
footnote from Mueller report... you tell me:

A possible remedy through impeachment for abuses of power **would not substitute for potential criminal liability after a President leaves office. Impeachment would remove a President from office, but would not address the underlying culpability of the conduct or serve the usual purposes of the criminal law**. Indeed, the Impeachment Judgment Clause recognizes that **criminal law plays an independent role in addressing an official’s conduct**, distinct from the political remedy of impeachment. See U.S. CONST. ART. l, § 3, cl. 7. Impeachment is also a drastic and rarely invoked remedy, and **Congress is not restricted to relying only on impeachment, rather than making criminal law applicable to a former President**, as OLC has recognized. A Sitting President’s Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution, 24 Op. O.L.C. at 255 (“Recognizing an immunity from prosecution for a sitting President would not preclude such prosecution once the President’s term is over or he is otherwise removed from office by resignation or impeachment.”).

You do know that this "report" was compiled by 17 never Trumpers, right?

Try to keep that in mind when dissecting it.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,930
Messages
13,464,259
Members
99,501
Latest member
janerothe
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com