You Vs. Jordan Spieth....you get 2 mulligans for each shot

[shdw01]

who wins?

You play from the white tees while he plays from the championship tees.

 

[StevieRay]

2 mulligans for each shot 10 yrs ago I give him a run

 

[NBAcapper08]

2 mullys each shot would be impossible to lose id think

 

[NBAcapper08]

Depending on the length of the course that is

 

[JustinCruise]

Bullshit alert in this thread


Truth is NOBODY here would have a chance

 

[JustinCruise]

2 mullys each shot would be impossible to lose id think

Smh

 

[shdw01]

Him at the championship and you at the white....i still think he is closer to the green after the tee shot

 

[loomis41973]

Be a good battle...i can hit it long and chip....putting would be my dagger.

 

[NBAcapper08]

I dunno. These pros are amazing but they only hit it so far. If speith can lose to a guy like rocco mediate who i know i hit it further than already 2 mulligans would be a battle

 

[shdw01]

let's put it this way.....par 3, let's say he has 205 and you have 180 from the tee.

do you think your 3 chances get inside of his one shot?

 

[shdw01]

small side point....2 mulligans doesn't mean best of 3 shots....you commit to using your 2nd mulligan, you have to take your last shot

 

[MantisToboggan]

I'm honestly not sure tee to green. Conditions would play a role. Are we talking US Open conditions? That'd be a struggle for any amateur golfer. The huge advantage is having 3 looks at every single putt.

 

[CHOPTALK]

small side point....2 mulligans doesn't mean best of 3 shots....you commit to using your 2nd mulligan, you have to take your last shot

That changes everything.
I would always be gambling that my 2nd shot will be better then my first.
Then I would be gambling that my 3rd shot would be better then my second.

 

[PatsFanatic]

I'm a 9 handicap and I would lose. The 2 mulligans MAY let me stay close to par, which only means he shoots under par.
Amateur golfers wouldn't stand a chance.

 

[Vlad the Impaler]

I still lose by 74 strokes. I would get so bored though by the 10th hole, I may have to pull a Tiger and walk off the course.

 

[NickPappagiorgio]

Depends on the golf course and the difference in yardage, but it would be alot closer than most of you think if the amateur is a decent golfer (10 or under handicap). If you give a decent golfer 3 shots to make a put from a makeable distance, they will usually make it

 

[gremlin]

C'mon. Would still lose by at least 10-15 strokes over a full 18. These guys bury 8-12 foot putts. Even if we both got on in the same number of strokes I am still not making a 15 foot putt with three tries at it and he is sinking his. Also any par 5 he's probably on in two and I'm in a bunker.

 

[Vlad the Impaler]

It would only be competitive on a par 3 course because at best, he birdies every hole. With 3 shots, alot here could probably get on the green on tee shot. Then have 3 chances to sink long put and he wouldn't birdie every hole anyway. would prob. still lose but better discussion than a real course.

 

[SECplayer]

I'm a very average golfer. Im content with a round in the 80s and that's on pretty simple courses. And that's never playing the ball "down."

If given two mulligans per shot, I think Spieth would easily beat me by double digits. Especially if we are playing a PGA Tour quality couse under PGA Tour conditions (fast greens, tall rough, playing ball as it lies, etc.).

These guys are just too good.

 

[shdw01]

I'm a 9 handicap and I would lose. The 2 mulligans MAY let me stay close to par, which only means he shoots under par.
Amateur golfers wouldn't stand a chance.

I have to think 2 mulligans per shot puts a 9 handicap under par