I keep hearing a lot of stuff from lib/dem/soc/commies about terrorism and terrorists. That they are appalled by what the terrorists have done. That we’re not doing the right things to stop the terrorists. That Dubya’s wrong (well, nothing new there) and the Frogs are right. That they are patriotic Americans, and how dare anyone question that.
Well, I question it.
The ultra liberals are not appalled by terrorism. They’re enthralled by it. They are happy to see the death of their fellow Americans, so long as it promotes their own political beliefs and power. Oh, they held hands on the steps of the Capitol and sang ''God Bless America'' but I’ll bet you a cookie that the left-of-center bunch had their fingers crossed behind their backs and a knife ready to bury in the backs of their political opponents. Didn’t take them long to start doing that second part, either, did it? They were predicting body bags ''in the tens of thousands'' pre-Iraq, and were sorely disappointed when they were (once again) proved wrong. Because a high body count would have meant higher poll numbers for them. That’s how these sickos think.
We’ve got Dick Clarke (the so-called terrorist ''expert,'' not the rock 'n roll guy with the oil painting of him, getting older, in his attic) saying how Dubya botched the job, wanted to attack Iraq first, didn’t know Al Qaeda from a hole in the ground, etc. Odd thing, though. Clarke didn’t seem to do much about terrorism during his watch with Slick Willie. And Slick did even less. He had Usama bin Laden offered up to him on a platter twice. Nothing. He had Usama in the crosshairs of a Predator Drone. Nothing. He was about to be impeached for lying under oath, and suddenly he’s Rambo, the Terminator, and Scarface all rolled into one, lobbing missiles into empty tents, aspirin factories and Bedouin’s grazing herds. I guess those of the far left are only ''tough on terror'' when they’re afraid of canvas, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and camel poop.
However, it should be said that Slick Willie did his bit for terrorism. In fact, the FBI at the time, under the direction of the Justice Department (Hmmm, I wonder who was in charge of that group back then) donated $3,000 to Hamas. Not to track how the monies are transferred into terrorist accounts, but to purposely disrupt the not-so-aptly named ''peace'' process. Since the head of Hamas died over the weekend, I wonder if Slick and Hillary will send flowers....
I still remember the week following 9/11. I was in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, at the time, and I remember getting some American TV programs. One of them, called ''Oxygen'' only seemed to prove that the participants of the show weren’t getting enough of that particular element. They were (guess what) blaming America for the attacks. And it has only gotten worse from there. '''Why do they hate us'' was the constant refrain from the liberal lefties, and their hand-wringing belied their crocodile tears shed after the attack.
America went into Afghanistan to take out Al Qaeda, and to bring down the Islamofascists of the Taliban. The leftists were there, whining and moaning all the way, complaining about the rights of a ''sovereign nation'' while conveniently forgetting the fact that said ''sovereign nation'' had supported terrorism, terrorists, and their good buddy Usama. The only time the lib/dem/soc/commies ever got upset with the Taliban, quite frankly, was when they were going to destroy ancient Buddhist monuments. I suppose if it were Christian monuments, they would have said ''Hey, we’ll supply the dynamite!''
When we won in Afghanistan, freeing around 25 million enslaved Afghanis, our troops captured many Al Qaeda and Taliban operatives who were shooting at them. Mark those words well. Shooting at them. So, these people were captured and taken to a place to be interrogated and incarcerated. The libs went ballistic, to be blunt. Oh, their rights, they cried. Cruel and unusual punishment, they lamented. No access to blasted lawyers, they moaned (probably the thing that honked them off the most – no $500-an-hour sharks circling the island). But these people are getting three squares a day, a free Qur’an and prayer rug and an arrow pointing them toward Makkah, and all the sodium pentathol they can drink (intravenously of course). They were trying to KILL OUR SOLDIERS, you spineless people. I’d dock ‘em at least one meal a day for that right there!
Then Dubya decided to take out a major source of terrorist support and training. Iraq. Remember them? Seventeen failed U.N. Resolutions, and you leftist and communist dingbats from A.N.S.W.E.R. still kept singing ''Give Despotism A Chance'' while Saddam continued to rape and torture and murder his own people. Dubya had intelligence that Saddam had WMDs (intelligence that Slick Willie also relied on, and the libs used to justify his 1998 Cruise Missile Orgasm) and also had supported terrorists. There was a tangible risk (not an imminent one) that Saddam could sell or hand over WMDs to terrorists.
Dubya gave Saddam every opportunity to obey the international community. Saddam didn’t. As a result, he got kicked from Baghdad to a filthy rat-hole. Another 25 million enslaved people were freed, bringing Dubya’s total to 50 million (Lincoln ain’t got nothin’ on Dubya!). Still, however, the liberal left complained. Over and over and over and over. With the exception of one outgoing senator, not a single lib/leftist has said a single good thing about Dubya’s actions – multi-lateral actions, mind you – while lying like a Clinton about the effect of the war on terror. All the while, leftists claim they are as patriotic as anybody else.
Patriotic my Aunt Fanny’s rump roast!
Now, I’m sure many libs will bray that they’re exercising their right of free speech, they’re the ''loyal'' opposition, they’re not helping or supporting terrorism, etc. This is a bunch of malarky. You can oppose a war, without giving support to the enemy. In World War II, the opponents were truly loyal. Any complaints they had about the execution of the war, they made by letter other manner to the government. They sure as heck didn’t block traffic, hold pro-Japan or pro-Nazi parades, play games with the enemy in their anti-aircraft emplacements (sorry, wrong war), or other such nonsense. Leftwing liberals and radicals, however, have abused the right of free speech in order to provide propaganda to terrorists. They’ve flown to Baghdad, gone on worldwide television, and called their president a liar. They’ve shown division instead of unity to our enemies, who perceive this as a weakness, not a strength.
So the next time you see liberals and leftists saying that they’re ''true patriots,'' that they’re ''tough on terrorism'' or some other euphemism, please give them a message from me.
''You Are Treasonous Terrorist-Loving Liars.''
http://www.chronwatch.com/content
Well, I question it.
The ultra liberals are not appalled by terrorism. They’re enthralled by it. They are happy to see the death of their fellow Americans, so long as it promotes their own political beliefs and power. Oh, they held hands on the steps of the Capitol and sang ''God Bless America'' but I’ll bet you a cookie that the left-of-center bunch had their fingers crossed behind their backs and a knife ready to bury in the backs of their political opponents. Didn’t take them long to start doing that second part, either, did it? They were predicting body bags ''in the tens of thousands'' pre-Iraq, and were sorely disappointed when they were (once again) proved wrong. Because a high body count would have meant higher poll numbers for them. That’s how these sickos think.
We’ve got Dick Clarke (the so-called terrorist ''expert,'' not the rock 'n roll guy with the oil painting of him, getting older, in his attic) saying how Dubya botched the job, wanted to attack Iraq first, didn’t know Al Qaeda from a hole in the ground, etc. Odd thing, though. Clarke didn’t seem to do much about terrorism during his watch with Slick Willie. And Slick did even less. He had Usama bin Laden offered up to him on a platter twice. Nothing. He had Usama in the crosshairs of a Predator Drone. Nothing. He was about to be impeached for lying under oath, and suddenly he’s Rambo, the Terminator, and Scarface all rolled into one, lobbing missiles into empty tents, aspirin factories and Bedouin’s grazing herds. I guess those of the far left are only ''tough on terror'' when they’re afraid of canvas, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and camel poop.
However, it should be said that Slick Willie did his bit for terrorism. In fact, the FBI at the time, under the direction of the Justice Department (Hmmm, I wonder who was in charge of that group back then) donated $3,000 to Hamas. Not to track how the monies are transferred into terrorist accounts, but to purposely disrupt the not-so-aptly named ''peace'' process. Since the head of Hamas died over the weekend, I wonder if Slick and Hillary will send flowers....
I still remember the week following 9/11. I was in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, at the time, and I remember getting some American TV programs. One of them, called ''Oxygen'' only seemed to prove that the participants of the show weren’t getting enough of that particular element. They were (guess what) blaming America for the attacks. And it has only gotten worse from there. '''Why do they hate us'' was the constant refrain from the liberal lefties, and their hand-wringing belied their crocodile tears shed after the attack.
America went into Afghanistan to take out Al Qaeda, and to bring down the Islamofascists of the Taliban. The leftists were there, whining and moaning all the way, complaining about the rights of a ''sovereign nation'' while conveniently forgetting the fact that said ''sovereign nation'' had supported terrorism, terrorists, and their good buddy Usama. The only time the lib/dem/soc/commies ever got upset with the Taliban, quite frankly, was when they were going to destroy ancient Buddhist monuments. I suppose if it were Christian monuments, they would have said ''Hey, we’ll supply the dynamite!''
When we won in Afghanistan, freeing around 25 million enslaved Afghanis, our troops captured many Al Qaeda and Taliban operatives who were shooting at them. Mark those words well. Shooting at them. So, these people were captured and taken to a place to be interrogated and incarcerated. The libs went ballistic, to be blunt. Oh, their rights, they cried. Cruel and unusual punishment, they lamented. No access to blasted lawyers, they moaned (probably the thing that honked them off the most – no $500-an-hour sharks circling the island). But these people are getting three squares a day, a free Qur’an and prayer rug and an arrow pointing them toward Makkah, and all the sodium pentathol they can drink (intravenously of course). They were trying to KILL OUR SOLDIERS, you spineless people. I’d dock ‘em at least one meal a day for that right there!
Then Dubya decided to take out a major source of terrorist support and training. Iraq. Remember them? Seventeen failed U.N. Resolutions, and you leftist and communist dingbats from A.N.S.W.E.R. still kept singing ''Give Despotism A Chance'' while Saddam continued to rape and torture and murder his own people. Dubya had intelligence that Saddam had WMDs (intelligence that Slick Willie also relied on, and the libs used to justify his 1998 Cruise Missile Orgasm) and also had supported terrorists. There was a tangible risk (not an imminent one) that Saddam could sell or hand over WMDs to terrorists.
Dubya gave Saddam every opportunity to obey the international community. Saddam didn’t. As a result, he got kicked from Baghdad to a filthy rat-hole. Another 25 million enslaved people were freed, bringing Dubya’s total to 50 million (Lincoln ain’t got nothin’ on Dubya!). Still, however, the liberal left complained. Over and over and over and over. With the exception of one outgoing senator, not a single lib/leftist has said a single good thing about Dubya’s actions – multi-lateral actions, mind you – while lying like a Clinton about the effect of the war on terror. All the while, leftists claim they are as patriotic as anybody else.
Patriotic my Aunt Fanny’s rump roast!
Now, I’m sure many libs will bray that they’re exercising their right of free speech, they’re the ''loyal'' opposition, they’re not helping or supporting terrorism, etc. This is a bunch of malarky. You can oppose a war, without giving support to the enemy. In World War II, the opponents were truly loyal. Any complaints they had about the execution of the war, they made by letter other manner to the government. They sure as heck didn’t block traffic, hold pro-Japan or pro-Nazi parades, play games with the enemy in their anti-aircraft emplacements (sorry, wrong war), or other such nonsense. Leftwing liberals and radicals, however, have abused the right of free speech in order to provide propaganda to terrorists. They’ve flown to Baghdad, gone on worldwide television, and called their president a liar. They’ve shown division instead of unity to our enemies, who perceive this as a weakness, not a strength.
So the next time you see liberals and leftists saying that they’re ''true patriots,'' that they’re ''tough on terrorism'' or some other euphemism, please give them a message from me.
''You Are Treasonous Terrorist-Loving Liars.''
http://www.chronwatch.com/content
