They may have or they may not have known and been misled by the same advertisement that they got Smokey with.SportSavant said:ace, any other winners may have well known the rules that WSEX had in the past 10 years so it is not an issue to them....
everyone received the new larger PAYOUT odds....
aceduecetrey said:They may have or they may not have known and been misled by the same advertisement that they got Smokey with.
The larger payoffs? Meaning full track odds?
I am sure anyone would have complained, but they may not have had the leverage of the forum to twist WSEX arm.SportSavant said:possible, but if they made the same mistake smokey did, they need to complain about it the way smokey did, I could be wrong, but I doubt they are gonna arbirtily pay all the customers if they didnt complain.... (IMO)
aceduecetrey said:I am sure anyone would have complained, but they may not have had the leverage of the forum to twist WSEX arm.
SportSavant said:im not blaming the punter.
WVU said:no not blaming him, but expecting him to know the 10 year history of an online book's policy regarding max payouts. All the guy did was place a small wager. If I had read what he read I would not have researched further. They did the right thing which is good, but you are still trying to take sides in this.
WVU said:Its all good SportsSavant. Just your wording screeched out at me. Most people are clueless when it comes to Terms and Conditions. The average person would have never found out the max payout limits. You are a bonus hustler like me so you are not average. Either are most of the people who took part in the poll. I am surprised by the result nonetheless. I suspect envy played a part.
wilheim said:It is actually possible that WSEX only wrote one ticket on an $11,000 Trifecta. Players don't hit that kind of payoff for a $2.00 bet alll that often.
Did WSEX have any others players bet the winning Tri? - I really don't know for sure.
wil..