WSEX 10% BONUS good for new accounts AND re-ups

Fishhead · Dec 21, 2004

spidermonkey said:
that makes about as much sense as fish's 'post' above.

My guess is that you havent played at 130+ books like me then.

wsexsteve · Dec 21, 2004

Aceking,

The official word from WSEX is that if you lose your first deposit and bonus,
you start fresh on your next deposit. I hope that clears things up.

Fishhead · Dec 21, 2004

wsexsteve said:
Aceking,

The official word from WSEX is that if you lose your first deposit and bonus,
you start fresh on your next deposit. I hope that clears things up.

THANKS Steve, good to hear from you and have the record set straight!

Rogthedodger · Dec 21, 2004

All Sportingbet PLC offshoots (Linesmaker, Sportingbetusa, etc.) and WWTS (and their offshoots like Wageronsports) have the "cumulative" rollover rule---even if you lose your full balance. Those books are the only ones I can think of right now.

Halifax · Dec 21, 2004

Rogthedodger said:
All Sportingbet PLC offshoots (Linesmaker, Sportingbetusa, etc.) and WWTS (and their offshoots like Wageronsports) have the "cumulative" rollover rule---even if you lose your full balance. Those books are the only ones I can think of right now.

I know what you are saying about the Sportingbet books, but I don't think it was done by design.

I think the problem is that there is a flaw (actually several flaws) in their new software that automatically calculates the rollover. I told them about these flaws months ago, but as usual, they don't seem to give a ****.

Fishhead · Dec 21, 2004

Rogthedodger said:
All Sportingbet PLC offshoots (Linesmaker, Sportingbetusa, etc.) and WWTS (and their offshoots like Wageronsports) have the "cumulative" rollover rule---even if you lose your full balance. Those books are the only ones I can think of right now.

Thanks for sharing!

Hope all is well this bowl season for you Rog

Rogthedodger · Dec 21, 2004

Well it was Fish, right up until the OH ST QB is not playing in the Alamo Bowl---that was gonna be one of my best plays!

But, the +4 and ML on the Tigers look good tomorrow.........

Fishhead · Dec 21, 2004

Rogthedodger said:
Well it was Fish, right up until the OH ST QB is not playing in the Alamo Bowl---that was gonna be one of my best plays!

But, the +4 and ML on the Tigers look good tomorrow.........

I TOTALLY AGREE!!

Shoot me an email please, Strutnut@aol.com

Unable to access my email currently, as I am here at the BUCS practice facility.

Will get back to you later this evening........nothing urgent.

Thanks,
FISH