CHOPTALK said:Heres my opinion.
Tonight I went into the college basketball forum and looked for a capper that was slumping. All the people that went 6-1 in there last seven or 3-0 last night I bypassed.
Now I also only checked the threads of the proven cappers that know what they are doing. Some people just flat out suck. I did not even look at those.
I picked the most respected capper I could find that has been slumping.
I found what I was looking for and made a play on SOUTH CAROLINA.:money8: :money8: :money8:
I believe in law of averages. Id rather play a good capper that has just lost 10 in a row than a good capper thats just won 10 in a row.
The one that has lost 10 straight has a better shot than the guy whos won 10 straight IMO.
ktvvegas said:I'd follow a capper that has won. Can't imagine a losing capper that sticks with the same methods and systems. So you'll see a lot of chasing and variations in volume etc. The old blind squirrel scenario is also bound to kick in for them too (the losing capper).
CHOPTALK said:I believe in law of averages. Id rather play a good capper that has just lost 10 in a row than a good capper thats just won 10 in a row.
The one that has lost 10 straight has a better shot than the guy whos won 10 straight IMO.
giorg0s said:It doesn't really matter.
If the way he caps each game it's still the same, and there is value on his play, the play still has a positive expectation. Also each game it's an individual event. It has no correlation with anybodys "trends" or anything. So in theory for every of his game you don't follow, you are throwing money away.