Would you like it more if games were official pointspread wise after regulation-NO OT

Search

0

Rx Wizard
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
11,731
Tokens
0
So for example my under 142.5 Northern Arizona bet today. The game ends tied 57-57 after regulation play for a total of 114. So it would be a winning ticket for under bettors (and winner after 1 overtime still).

I know this stuff evens out but it hurts a little when you have a 8 point dog who gets outscored by 10 in overtime. I know everyone has been on the end of a total that doesnt have a shot but goes over after 1 (or in my case 2, LOL) overtime.

I have heard this discussion on here before. Do you think it would be better if games are graded after regulation time?

Would it be more fair to do it this way?
 

0

No Half Steppin'
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
2,136
Tokens
0
I've always hated the inherent value to over/ favorite players because of OT. This coming from someone who plays unders/ dogs far more often than not.

surprised an "in regulation" option has never developed.
 

0

Self appointed RX World Champion Handicapper
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
15,052
Tokens
0
always thought over / unders should be graded at the end of regulation.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,123,958
Messages
13,640,379
Members
101,748
Latest member
avessecurity
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com
TheRX uses cookies to help us provide, protect & improve our services. See our Privacy Policy for more details.
Accept & Close