One qualifier for Sunday
System 2......43-5 ATS LY......7-1 TY
Atlanta Over......2H
Of Interest:
Chicago 5-35 on ML after Conf game.....2-5 TY
Chicago 27-6 Over 1Hafter 3+ losses......2-1 TY......lost yesterday
Connecticut 26-9 ATS on Sunday......2-2 TY
Connecticut 32-9 SU vs teams with losing records......5-2 TY
Connecticut 30-10 Over 1H on the road......6-2 TY
Last nights winner with Seattle 2H under was a difficult play to make. I came inches away from passing, but decided to make it anyway. I have a general rule of thumb in both Football and Basketball for 2H total plays. I have used this rule a lot and have been rewarded in the long run for it.
It's the Double Digit rule. In order to even consider a play in the 2H....the 1H total has to be at least in double digits off the the posted 1H line. Last nights Seattle game is a perfect example.
The 1H total was about 71. The halftime time was 30-28, a combined total of 58 which would be 13 less than the line, (Double Digits) thereby opening the doors to a possible play, if I chose to make it on the 2H over. That was one of the very few times I have ever gone against the Double Digit rule.
BOL,
Green Valley
System 2......43-5 ATS LY......7-1 TY
Atlanta Over......2H
Of Interest:
Chicago 5-35 on ML after Conf game.....2-5 TY
Chicago 27-6 Over 1Hafter 3+ losses......2-1 TY......lost yesterday
Connecticut 26-9 ATS on Sunday......2-2 TY
Connecticut 32-9 SU vs teams with losing records......5-2 TY
Connecticut 30-10 Over 1H on the road......6-2 TY
Last nights winner with Seattle 2H under was a difficult play to make. I came inches away from passing, but decided to make it anyway. I have a general rule of thumb in both Football and Basketball for 2H total plays. I have used this rule a lot and have been rewarded in the long run for it.
It's the Double Digit rule. In order to even consider a play in the 2H....the 1H total has to be at least in double digits off the the posted 1H line. Last nights Seattle game is a perfect example.
The 1H total was about 71. The halftime time was 30-28, a combined total of 58 which would be 13 less than the line, (Double Digits) thereby opening the doors to a possible play, if I chose to make it on the 2H over. That was one of the very few times I have ever gone against the Double Digit rule.
BOL,
Green Valley