Wisconsin vs Michigan

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
577
Tokens
Like Michigan plus the 6. I know that they have not exactly lit the world on fire. For some reason, with the extra week of rest, I am expecting an inspired effort and an improved team. Not sold on Wisky QB, Everidge winning on the road in front of 108K people.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
181
Tokens
I've never liked any team more than I like Wisconsin this week. Ever. BOL but I'm unloading on the Badgers. I'll eat crow if they don't win.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2005
Messages
1,641
Tokens
The line is waaaay to juicy...squares see WISKY and jump on it....that being said I like Wisky but will not bet it because there is something wrong with that line
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
181
Tokens
I am not exactly "square" if that's what you're implying. I like the home dog as much as the next guy, or the SU dog who will win outright, but Michigan is putrid and Wisky is legit. Somebody break it down and tell me exactly in X's and O's how they think Michigan can even come close to competing.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
909
Tokens
I know Wisconsin went to Fresno and all that but how good is Fresno really? Beat a terrible Rutgers team and struggled with Toledo. Wisconsin put up 13 on a D that Toledo scored 54 on. Wisconsin got down 14 early against Marshall and Chris Jacquemain had a good game against Wisconsin throwing the ball. I still see a lot of question marks with Wisconsin. Not a top 10 team IMO. I think if Michigan holds on to the ball and plays solid D they cover here. BOL.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2005
Messages
1,641
Tokens
I am not exactly "square" if that's what you're implying. I like the home dog as much as the next guy, or the SU dog who will win outright, but Michigan is putrid and Wisky is legit. Somebody break it down and tell me exactly in X's and O's how they think Michigan can even come close to competing.


Ill break it down using some formula that I made up many years ago:

X=Linemakers
0=You
Y=Line too good to be true
Z=You being upset after "team that didnt have a chance covering"

SO it goes something like this, try to follow

X>O

O+Y=Z which is where there X being greater than O comes in

Get it?:think2:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
577
Tokens
I know Wisconsin went to Fresno and all that but how good is Fresno really? Beat a terrible Rutgers team and struggled with Toledo. Wisconsin put up 13 on a D that Toledo scored 54 on. Wisconsin got down 14 early against Marshall and Chris Jacquemain had a good game against Wisconsin throwing the ball. I still see a lot of question marks with Wisconsin. Not a top 10 team IMO. I think if Michigan holds on to the ball and plays solid D they cover here. BOL.

Your comments pretty much sum up my reasons for taking Michigan. They should have a better grasp of the offense coming of the bye. Michigan defense matches up well against Wisky offense. Just don't see Everidge coming up big in his first conference game on the road.
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
The line is waaaay to juicy...squares see WISKY and jump on it....that being said I like Wisky but will not bet it because there is something wrong with that line

Its called perception. People can't believe Michigan will be this bad. Kind of like the Bama-Arkansas line last week.
 

Gaz

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
3,594
Tokens
Yep, good ole public perception. If anyone watched the Notre Dame Michigan game, they'd be hard pressed to take Michigan in this game. They were horrible against a very average Irish team. No play for me, staying away but I would not be surprised at all if Michigan covers.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
181
Tokens
Ill break it down using some formula that I made up many years ago:

X=Linemakers
0=You
Y=Line too good to be true
Z=You being upset after "team that didnt have a chance covering"

SO it goes something like this, try to follow

X>O

O+Y=Z which is where there X being greater than O comes in

Get it?:think2:

That is priceless, and you're probably right. The more of you on Michigan is helping me to scale back my enthusiasm for the Badgers.
 

Shalom- the cousin of Freddie Hoiberg
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
386
Tokens
michigan--> not as bad as you guys think. mcguffie is a stud. youtube him
 

New member
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
129
Tokens
some times in win

My little friends:

Take Michigan and the points:
Why?

1. I will not bet on the game.
2. Wisky over rated...Mich under rated
3. Big 10 play...conservative.
4. Did I tell you I WILL NOT BET ON THE FUCKING GGGGAME>>>>>> MICH will win outrigght.


Thank you.


Krazy Murph.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2005
Messages
1,641
Tokens
I have no interest in the game...i feel the line is low because something is up...public preception has nothing to do with this one, people know Michigan is "that Bad" Can we say AppState??

This line smells, i wouldnt be suprised eiether way in this one
 

New member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
1,842
Tokens
Did someone say Mich under rated? didnt this team lose at home to utah? Then get killed by horrible ND.
 

New member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
329
Tokens
<TABLE id=HB_Mail_Container height="100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0 UNSELECTABLE="on"><TBODY><TR height="100%" UNSELECTABLE="on" width="100%"><TD id=HB_Focus_Element vAlign=top width="100%" background="" height=250 UNSELECTABLE="off">Wisky maybe over rated but their OL is HUGE and should blow Michigan off the ball
</TD></TR><TR UNSELECTABLE="on" hb_tag="1"><TD style="FONT-SIZE: 1pt" height=1 UNSELECTABLE="on">
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,985
Messages
13,575,768
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com