Who Has The Better Defense Of The Final Four Now?

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
862
Tokens
Cinn total yearly spread -66.5
pts scd 469
pts alld 349
total +120
minus spread 66.5
PATS +53.5

KC total yearly spread -127.5
pts scd 523
pts alld 389
minus spread 127.5
PATS +6.5

Seem to align with what I've already picked so I'll go with them
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
8,474
Tokens
Cinn total yearly spread -66.5
pts scd 469
pts alld 349
total +120
minus spread 66.5
PATS +53.5

KC total yearly spread -127.5
pts scd 523
pts alld 389
minus spread 127.5
PATS +6.5

Seem to align with what I've already picked so I'll go with them
You lost me there
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,096
Tokens
So Much for the SF defense..
Obviously the last 5 games showed that SF was not number #1 today.
Starting to look like the KC win 44-23
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,574
Tokens
So Much for the SF defense..
Obviously the last 5 games showed that SF was not number #1 today.
Starting to look like the KC win 44-23
Idiotic statement SF QBs injured, no O, D on field all day, game over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
2,826
Tokens
So Much for the SF defense..
Obviously the last 5 games showed that SF was not number #1 today.
Starting to look like the KC win 44-23
You know what kind of person brags when he's 2-12 in the postseason?
 

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
3,021
Tokens
So Much for the SF defense..
Obviously the last 5 games showed that SF was not number #1 today.
Starting to look like the KC win 44-23
This is where I think you get a bit lost. I like the opinions but your logic on those opinions are so bonkers.

This last 5 games stuff it’s like running in circles with you on your subjective reasoning.

SF D today isn’t playing lights out. But it’s not playing horrible either. Bit sloppy with few penalties. Eagles most certainly aren’t just cruising along. And Hurts hasn’t done much.

It’s also not helping the Offense gifting the defense of SF bad positions to start from.

Either way SF needed to step up bigger given the circumstances but they failed to.
 

MLB

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
2,492
Tokens
Teams do progress during the season. McCaffrey was also big addition to SF offensively.

But I come back to the offenses that SF faced during the season. Only faced a few teams on the road that had above average offense. They let up 34 points to LV on the road and almost lost. They haven't faced an offense on the road like the Eagles.

SF could win tomorrow. My opinion is if SF is to win (and I personally see them losing by 13+) they will have to score at least 35 to do it, because I believe the Eagles will be able to score at least 34.
Love it when a plan comes together
 

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
1,034
Tokens
God he really didn’t show up talking about the San Fran d.

anyone with half a brain knew as soon as the qb went down the game changed significantly… once purdy had to come back in… shoulda just went ti a running clock.
 

come strong or dont come at all
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
5,408
Tokens
I know this is bad on my part but had to do it. Where’s the troll kick ass now
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,096
Tokens
This is where I think you get a bit lost. I like the opinions but your logic on those opinions are so bonkers.

This last 5 games stuff it’s like running in circles with you on your subjective reasoning.

SF D today isn’t playing lights out. But it’s not playing horrible either. Bit sloppy with few penalties. Eagles most certainly aren’t just cruising along. And Hurts hasn’t done much.

It’s also not helping the Offense gifting the defense of SF bad positions to start from.

Either way SF needed to step up bigger given the circumstances but they failed to.
Chris. The entire post was why a different defense may show up related to the last 5 games. Everyone else wanted to turn it into a who's smarter bashing mess.
Im not putting aside that Purdy went out. Philly took no chances. They played very conservative and the game could have been a lot closer.
Without a lead they (SF) were not that good. Even when it was 7-7 they still didn't take control.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
2,182
Tokens
Chris. The entire post was why a different defense may show up related to the last 5 games. Everyone else wanted to turn it into a who's smarter bashing mess.
Im not putting aside that Purdy went out. Philly took no chances. They played very conservative and the game could have been a lot closer.
Without a lead they (SF) were not that good. Even when it was 7-7 they still didn't take control.
How could you take control with a 4 string QB? Game was over as soon as Prudy was gone. It would have been the same for Philly if they lost their QB. Sometimes you are on the right side of luck. You can't handicap that. To me it didn't matter who won. If you can't see that you have a closed mind.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,096
Tokens
How could you take control with a 4 string QB? Game was over as soon as Prudy was gone. It would have been the same for Philly if they lost their QB. Sometimes you are on the right side of luck. You can't handicap that. To me it didn't matter who won. If you can't see that you have a closed mind.
The QB loss was all the difference in the score. I agree.
But was pointing out that if SF was the great D as claimed we should have
could have seen a 10-7 game or 13-10.
The Philly defense was good but not their best. They would have given up more points with Purdy playing.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
2,182
Tokens
The QB loss was all the difference in the score. I agree.
But was pointing out that if SF was the great D as claimed we should have
could have seen a 10-7 game or 13-10.
The Philly defense was good but not their best. They would have given up more points with Purdy playing.
Philly defense didn't have to worry about a passing game once Prudy was gone. They just play the run. It's a total different game. We will never know.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
1,034
Tokens
Bengals D defintely didnt belong at the top of the final 4 team list. Outplayed by KCs D.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,096
Tokens
Bengals D defintely didnt belong at the top of the final 4 team list. Outplayed by KCs D.
So Troll - if the Bengals would have won by 3 then you would have said the same thing about the KC defense. Thats what a troll does, who never posted a play.

In fact they were, just as posted, 1st and second and the fact that both teams were held below their high scoring averages it validates that.
It was as close as they were on the season and more close to the last 5 games allowing 16 and 18 points.
Im sure all you bashers were sick after Philly rolled...But no comment when there is a win. Only on a loss.
Thats why all of you guys need to be banned.

AND HERE WE ARE, A YEAR LATER AND THE MANAGEMENT IS STILL ALLOWING YOU BOYS/OR GIRLS (BECAUSE YOU ACT LIKE SISSY'S) TO CONTINUE TO DO THIS ON THIS FORUM.

I WISH I HAD" CONNECTIONS" AND "INSIDE INFO" LIKE YOU DOC, LIKE YOU TOLD THE WHOLE FORUM JUST 3 WEEKS AGO THAT YOU HAD THAT, WITH THE GEORGIA FOOTBALL TEAM.
OH MY!
 

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
3,021
Tokens
So Troll - if the Bengals would have won by 3 then you would have said the same thing about the KC defense. Thats what a troll does, who never posted a play.

In fact they were, just as posted, 1st and second and the fact that both teams were held below their high scoring averages it validates that.
It was as close as they were on the season and more close to the last 5 games allowing 16 and 18 points.
Im sure all you bashers were sick after Philly rolled...But no comment when there is a win. Only on a loss.
Thats why all of you guys need to be banned.

AND HERE WE ARE, A YEAR LATER AND THE MANAGEMENT IS STILL ALLOWING YOU BOYS/OR GIRLS (BECAUSE YOU ACT LIKE SISSY'S) TO CONTINUE TO DO THIS ON THIS FORUM.

I WISH I HAD" CONNECTIONS" AND "INSIDE INFO" LIKE YOU DOC, LIKE YOU TOLD THE WHOLE FORUM JUST 3 WEEKS AGO THAT YOU HAD THAT, WITH THE GEORGIA FOOTBALL TEAM.
OH MY!
Banned? Some troll. Some offer counter arguments. Some offer opinions. It’s the RX can’t be too sensitive.

The Niners game was unfortunate Purdy injuries first series. Kid gotta give us a half to at least grasp a lil insight on how these teams match up.

Eagles were gifted great already scoring positions a few times. Part in thanks to a good Phi D. Other in part to a 4th string journeyman. However, SF D didn’t do a good job limiting 1-2 of those possession to a FG. That’s on the D. Two FGs would gone down if not for flags on 3rd down stops. But again some of that is on the D.

Eagles were pedestrian on offense to several degrees. Hurts didn’t look good. 250 total team yards offense not good at all. They were bailed out several times by flags. SF accumulated a bunch of flags. However, Phi much like SF last week s Dallas was able to play conservative. It’s the smart play can’t blame them. No need to open the O up given the challenge SF had on offense

I favored a higher scoring game SF vs Philly. Believe I predicted a 26-24 game. Or 31-17 eagles blowout if Purdy is trash. Despite believing both teams have elite D, often times these styles clash and big explosive plays pop. Much like championship games for some reasons overs and points pop off when good defense is involved

Unfortunate we were robbed of a great matchup and it’s potential with the early blow to Purdy. Hard to know how it would have played out


The bengals game was as expected. Believe I predicted 23-20 OT. Cin D was legit and Cin unfortunately was screwed on flags a bit like SF but bengals got way more BS questionable calls. Even the PF on Patty was BS imo. Too late in game too big a call on a QB who ran vs a LB making a play. These are fractions of a second on a full momentum player heading towards Patty. It was a weak touch with Patty already momentum wise going out. Slow now and replay always makes these things look worse

Bengals D was legit today. KC D was solid. Cin was down 3 OL guys. The pressure by KC wasn’t surprising. KC took a blow with Tooney JuJu Hardmen going down. Boyd went down Cin. Patty was hobbled. Both teams sorta caught some breaks on D personnel wise

End of day Cin looked like the better D today imo. And probably deserve the win.

I’d still rank SF and Phi Over Cin D. KC the worst of the bunch. Cin D being the wildcard D that is better suited for certain teams than SF or Phi. The 335 drop 8 is a tuff out and great RZ D. Complete bend don’t break D. Phi run scheme would been an issue for Cin D.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,110,695
Messages
13,472,568
Members
99,585
Latest member
trungtammatgiavietnam
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com