That is such typical liberal c*nt remark. So if you're pro-Bush, but you're not in Iraq fighting, that means that you're not walking the walk. Give me a f-ing break.Pocket 1's said:If your so pro Bush than go fight in Iraq. Or is it just the poor kids that should fight?
No one wants to talk about that. Bush has the military slugging it out with the terrorists, instead of terrorists committing attacks on American citizens. Why isn't that a good thing? And our fine boys in uniform (and women) are taking out more of these a-holes each day. I can definately think of some worse scenarios.hansen bros. said:you really don't get it do you???? we are not striving to be like israel -- Bush is keeping the fight over there rather than fighting them here --
How the troops feel varies with each individual. Because they signed up for duty (as opposed to being drafted) I feel that our men and women of the military feel more of a comradery and responsibilty for each other and to cover each others backs. Many have completed a tour in Iraq and can't wait to get back there, so there's something going on there that is creating a strong sense of duty in these brave Americans, which this country has always been rich in. I think there would be fewer guys over there wondering to themselves "What the F*** am I doing here?" as opposed to the Nam where many were drafted and unfortunately thrown into the mix.wilheim said:Unlike you I know a bit about the real world including what it takes to defend a nation (year in Nam). You only think you know how our troops feel but really have no idea. As far as fighting the so called enemy over there goes have you ever given any thought that maybe if we had not invaded Iraq the so called insurgents would still going about the daily lives that they led before the invasion. Bottom line this election is a done deal, woof all you want, nothing is going to change the mandate that the American people are going to issue on Tuesday. Kerry wins easy.