WHO Admits the Obvious: There's no such thing as hetereosexual AIDS! LOL

Search

Militant Birther
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
11,836
Tokens
There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit

WHO confesses to 25 years of misguided AIDS policies. But they still want you to believe them.

<!-- BEGIN art-art_by_line-block -->By Liam Scheff

Published: Thursday June 12th, 2008

It is official: AIDS is not explicable by sexual transmission, at least not outside of Sub-Saharan Africans, gay men, intravenous drug users and prostitutes. For the rest of us, there is no heterosexual AIDS pandemic, and further, there will be no heterosexual AIDS pandemic.

“Threat of world AIDS pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits,” The Independent announced on Sunday, June 8, 2008, mimicking what I have been reporting for years (and what some of my colleagues have been reporting for decades).

No, really. But take it from someone you trust, Dr. Kevin de **** of the World Health Organization(WHO): “[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of AIDS in the heterosexual population outside Africa.”

“A 25-year health campaign was misplaced outside the continent of Africa,” the article concedes, daring you hang them all. And so they’re quick to add a massive fiction: “But the disease still kills more than all wars and conflicts.”

The authorities explain that they misled the entire world, for decades, because admitting the grandeur of their farce would have encouraged their critics: “Any revision of the threat was liable to be seized on by those who rejected HIV as the cause of the disease.” Of course! We’ve got to protect flawed science from criticism!

But, regardless of past and current performance (and admissions of outright massive fraud), the authorities at the WHO and UNAIDS still want you to believe them, when they talk about AIDS, Bird Flu, Sars, and other advertised but not achieved super-pandemics.

Such a weak defense might encourage a curious mind to wonder at the other flaws in their paradigm. For example, are we now to believe that there is a virus that causes a fatal disease, but only in Africans, (wherever in the world they may be), gay men and drug addicts? But not the entirety of the human population that is sexually active?

The answer to the riddle may be found in the actual cause of “HIV” – namely, “HIV testing.” Figure out who is tested, how the tests work (or, more to the point, how they don’t work), and who the tests are said to be accurate for, and you’ll get an understanding of how the “AIDS” diagnosis – now, no better than a brand name applied to poverty and drug addiction – actually works.

Read the rest here:

http://www.guerrillanews.com/articles/3739/There_Will_Be_No_Heterosexual_AIDS_Epidemic_Experts_Admit

**************************************************************************************

I tried to convince some of you lemmings, but lemmings have never been big proponents of reason, only and always emotion and hype.

"It's over" they say -- IT WAS NEVER A THREAT TO BEGIN WITH! :lolBIG:

I feel sorry for anyone who ever believed in the myth of heterosexual AIDS but the incontrovertible reality of time strikes again!

Next time, please listen to me.

:dancefool :dancefool :dancefool :dancefool :dancefool
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
Even AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa has been traced to the birth control practice of anal intercourse. Anal intercourse allows HIV to be absorbed into the blood stream via the colon where liquids are absorbed readily. This explains why homosexual men can catch the virus easily.

Also, semen contains a large amount of lymphatic fluid where HIV is present in those people who are infected. Vaginal fluids do NOT contain much of this virus. In fact, vaginal fluids are highly acidic. HIV is a very fragile virus. Vaginal fluids provide a hostile environment to the virus.
 

Militant Birther
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
11,836
Tokens
quantumleap, this one's for you:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SiU8PksSqdI&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SiU8PksSqdI&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

And many more... :103631605
 

New member
Joined
Jun 5, 2007
Messages
257
Tokens
This is quite true I'll have to admit.

Anal sex is the culprit. Those who practice will reap the world wind.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Tokens
no generalized epidemic = no such thing

That means there's no such thing as cancer either. Woohoo! :party:

Learn something new every day in this forum, it's amazin' I tell ya
 

Militant Birther
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
11,836
Tokens
no generalized epidemic = no such thing

That means there's no such thing as cancer either. Woohoo! :party:

Learn something new every day in this forum, it's amazin' I tell ya

I don't know what you mean by 'epidemic' but as far as I'm concerned, the disease doesn't target anyone important (homos, drug users, prostitutes etc.).

The reason the AIDS lobby spread the myth of heterosexual AIDS is so that the public would get scared into funding research for a cause that only affects a tiny minority -- if you're pardon the expression, "the armpit of society."

Had the public been made aware that there was no health risk whatsoever to those who practiced normal heterosexual sex, the public would have let out a big collective yawn and said fuck you very much, have a nice day.

The ONLY reason they scared the shit out us is because *they* have an agenda -- an agenda on promoting a society that does not judge behavior -- any kind of behavior. A society that removes any all traditional social stigmas on ANY behavior.

Imagine a disease in our pathetically dumbed-down PC society that targets immoral behavior -- can't have that now can we? :ohno:

"AIDS: Not the just a gay disease!" (Yes it is!) :lolBIG:
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
<TABLE class=storycontent cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=2>Aids epidemic a 'global disaster'


</TD></TR><TR><TD class=storybody><!-- S BO --><!-- S IBYL --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=466 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=bottom>By Imogen Foulkes
BBC News, Geneva
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
999999.gif


<!-- E IBYL -->
<!-- S IIMA --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=226 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
_44779817_cambodia_afp226b.jpg
Much Aids funding is not reaching those most in need, the IFRC says

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IIMA --><!-- S SF -->
The Aids epidemic in some countries is so severe that it should be classified as a disaster, the Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC) has warned.
The crisis fits the UN definition of a disaster as an event beyond the scope of any single society to cope with, says the IFRC.
The IFRC's annual report on world disasters usually focuses on specific natural disasters such as earthquakes.
The report says much of the money spent on Aids is not reaching those in need. <!-- E SF -->
This year, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) is departing from tradition with its world disasters report, to focus on what it says is one of the most long term and complex problems facing the world: the HIV/Aids epidemic.
'Easy options'
By any standard, the epidemic is a global disaster: 25 million deaths, 33 million people living with HIV/Aids, 7,000 new infections every day.
The IFRC finds the world's response wanting.
There may be billions of dollars to spend on the fight against Aids, but the report warns that much of the money has not been targeted properly and is not reaching those most in need.
"When the history of HIV and Aids is written I think the people will say that we just went for the easier options," says Dr Mukesh Kapila, the IFRC's special representative on HIV/Aids.
General education and general awareness have been done, he says, but people at risk such as sex workers and injecting drug users are difficult for many governments to tackle.
<!-- S IIMA -->
_44428700_d3333a02-f5e4-4802-9b2a-e91e193a0567.jpg


<!-- E IIMA -->
Another area where the IFRC believes our response is lacking is in our approach to HIV/Aids during natural disaster or conflict.
The risk factors for the disease may rise, while at the same time - in the rush to bring in emergency relief - the needs of HIV/Aids patients may be forgotten.
Relief workers need to factor those needs into their relief programmes, Dr Kapila says.
HAVE YOUR SAY
Although Aids has impacted on millions of people it's not something that can be sorted out by throwing money at it.​
Andrew Hunt, UK
<!-- S ILIN -->Send us your comments
<!-- E ILIN -->


After the South Asian tsunami hit Aceh in Indonesia in 2005, he says, "we had a rise in the risk factors like sexual and gender based violence, so we saw a situation where there was high vulnerability and HIV and other conditions can flourish in those circumstances."
The IFRC says Kenya is a good example of such an integrated approach.
When 300,000 people were displaced during post-election violence, health workers acted quickly to make sure Aids patients continued to get anti-retroviral drugs. Patients in camps for the displaced were traced, and a free hotline was set up with details of the nearest Aids clinics. That is the kind of swift and targeted response which is needed, the IFRC says, to a global disaster which will be with us for years to come.<!-- E BO -->
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7474600.stm
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
8,894
Tokens
BBC...:nohead:

Who believes those drama queens anymore?
 

Everything's Legal in the USofA...Just don't get c
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
2,199
Tokens
I don't know what you mean by 'epidemic' but as far as I'm concerned, the disease doesn't target anyone important (homos, drug users, prostitutes etc.).

The reason the AIDS lobby spread the myth of heterosexual AIDS is so that the public would get scared into funding research for a cause that only affects a tiny minority -- if you're pardon the expression, "the armpit of society."

Had the public been made aware that there was no health risk whatsoever to those who practiced normal heterosexual sex, the public would have let out a big collective yawn and said fuck you very much, have a nice day.

The ONLY reason they scared the shit out us is because *they* have an agenda -- an agenda on promoting a society that does not judge behavior -- any kind of behavior. A society that removes any all traditional social stigmas on ANY behavior.

Imagine a disease in our pathetically dumbed-down PC society that targets immoral behavior -- can't have that now can we? :ohno:

"AIDS: Not the just a gay disease!" (Yes it is!) :lolBIG:

What about Magic Johnson? He's certainly not gay.
 

Militant Birther
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
11,836
Tokens
What about Magic Johnson? He's certainly not gay.

Well, no, but he was a slut who slept with people in the above mentioned "high risk" categories. (I did say immoral behavior, didn't I?)

The "AIDS: not just a gay disease" was a slogan in the 80s spread by the loonies who were promoting a non-judgmental society.

Reap what you sow...
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
What about when a woman is sharkbait?

Is that a high risk?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Tokens
Joe, I agree with much of what you say, including the big dupe job to get the funding and awareness, etc.

It's the exaggeration in the thread title that I think is a bit much.
 

Militant Birther
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
11,836
Tokens
Joe, I agree with much of what you say, including the big dupe job to get the funding and awareness, etc.

It's the exaggeration in the thread title that I think is a bit much.

Hyperbole is often necessary to counter such flabbergasting untruth.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
457
Tokens
I don't know what you mean by 'epidemic' but as far as I'm concerned, the disease doesn't target anyone important (homos, drug users, prostitutes etc.). does that include you,since you are prostitute of the right?you are a sick human being.If this statement is not ban worthy,i dont know what is.:finger::finger::finger:
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
I don't know what you mean by 'epidemic' but as far as I'm concerned, the disease doesn't target anyone important (homos, drug users, prostitutes etc.).

Good to see that Mark's 90 days in the basement didn't chill either his homophobic rants nor his perversely ironic slotting of "drug users" when he himself is an active user of drugs, including the pyschotropic and addictive alcohol.

Welcome home, Mark. The sophomoric and intellectual void created by DOC MERCER kinda makes your railings seem viable.

Who knew?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,982
Messages
13,575,746
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com