What's up with the Wisky/Minnesota line?

[quantumleap]

Started out Wisky -1, then went to Wisky +2. Now it's back to Wisky -1.

People trying to get both sides?

 

[GilRenard]

It seems that there is a lot of money coming in on the Badgers. I really like Minnesota in this spot, but it all depends on whether the Badgers are hitting their jumpers. The Badgers live and die by the three.

 

[IndyMike77]

hard to win on road in big ten and minny isnt a slouch good spot for minny ill take them tonight

 

[Akillies]

when that happens its usually two groups on opposite sides

 

[spokenword14]

Wisconsin been a better team on the road this year. 3-3 at home in the BiG Ten and 4-1 on the road. Shooting 40.2% from three-point range in Big Ten road games and only 23% from three-point range in Big Ten home games.

 

[DNZ2411]

QL,
this perplexed me as well...I am leaning on a no play for the game, b/c IMO there plenty of other good games on the card. If I had to play a side it would be for the better team, Wisky, there are a couple of guys that I like to check in on their picks and they both like Wisky....just saying...

and,

it seems we have another curious USC line (not sure if you remember my posts from the past) but this thing is holding STEADY at 8 and there is a TON of love for Cal....why are the books doing this to me???

 

[quantumleap]

QL,
this perplexed me as well...I am leaning on a no play for the game, b/c IMO there plenty of other good games on the card. If I had to play a side it would be for the better team, Wisky, there are a couple of guys that I like to check in on their picks and they both like Wisky....just saying...

and,

it seems we have another curious USC line (not sure if you remember my posts from the past) but this thing is holding STEADY at 8 and there is a TON of love for Cal....why are the books doing this to me???

I hear you about USC. They have been driving me nuts ever since they covered on the road against Oregon. The only thing I can think of is a bunch of rich USC backers get together and bet on their team and it affects the line accordingly.

 

[billhill999]

I hate these 115 totals.
You know it's probably going under, but it's like 2 1/2 hours of water torture rooting for a ridiculous 115 under.

 

[quantumleap]

when that happens its usually two groups on opposite sides

That would make sense.

Or how about Billy Walters' group trying to get a better line on Wisky by betting Minnesota and then unloading on Wisky when it gets to +2?

 

[billhill999]

Game 717-718: Wisconsin at Minnesota (7:00 p.m. EST)
Dunkel Ratings: Wisconsin 70.279; Minnesota 71.377
Dunkel Line: Minnesota by 1; 108
Vegas Line: Wisconsin by 1; 114
Dunkel Pick: Minnesota (+1); Under

 

[quantumleap]

Game 717-718: Wisconsin at Minnesota (7:00 p.m. EST)
Dunkel Ratings: Wisconsin 70.279; Minnesota 71.377
Dunkel Line: Minnesota by 1; 108
Vegas Line: Wisconsin by 1; 114
Dunkel Pick: Minnesota (+1); Under

Thanks bill.

 

[colorado]

i played Minn at pick em, home team just needs to win, i will gladly take that in the Big10

 

[Betsmart]

I'm on Wisky.

 

[RussellPeters]

Wisky looks really good at the half. They are getting tons of 2nd chance points, crashing the boards and hitting their 3s. Minny is in trouble. Thought it would be a close battle coming down to the final shot but looks like Wisky is going to run away with this one. Good luck to all who have either side!

 

[quantumleap]

QL,
this perplexed me as well...I am leaning on a no play for the game, b/c IMO there plenty of other good games on the card. If I had to play a side it would be for the better team, Wisky, there are a couple of guys that I like to check in on their picks and they both like Wisky....just saying...

and,

it seems we have another curious USC line (not sure if you remember my posts from the past) but this thing is holding STEADY at 8 and there is a TON of love for Cal....why are the books doing this to me???

Cal line just went to -9. I'm tempted to put some on Cal now.