What's funny About the Arizona so-called "anti-gay" law - is that it does the opposite of what the media says it does - and the ignorant sheeple are t

[festeringZit]

What's funny About the Arizona so-called "anti-gay" law - is that it does the opposite of what the media says it does - and the ignorant sheeple are too dumb to realize it

It is not against current state law in Arizona for a business owner to discriminate against gays, or any other group.

What this law does is *restrict* that possible discrimination. But since the PC media portrays this law as being
anti-gay, the dumb ass low-information sheeple out there is too stupid to know the difference.

" Under current Arizona law, if a business wanted to discriminate against gays, they would not need this bill to be passed to do so. It is not currently illegal for a business to deny service to someone because they are gay. Some cities in Arizona have ordinances against it but there is no state law against it. If business owners in Arizona wanted to deny service to gays, they could do so in most of the state under current law."

"
Given that, here are some of the main changes the Arizona bill would make:

• Those covered by RFRA would include "any individual, association, partnership, corporation, church, religious assembly or institution or other business organization."
• A religious freedom violation can be asserted "regardless of whether the government is a party to the proceeding."
• The person asserting a religious freedom violation must show three things: "1. That the person's action or refusal to act is motivated by a religious belief. 2. That the person's religious belief is sincerely held. 3. That the state action substantially burdens the exercise of the person's religious beliefs."

In sum, the bill would essentially make three changes for RFRA: 1) Clarify that any association, including for-profit corporations, are covered. 2) Clarify that the government does not have to be a party in the case. And, 3) to prevent frivolous RFRA claims, require that those claiming a religious freedom violation show that there is an actual religious belief behind their action, that they are sincere in their religious belief, and a state action has placed a substantial burden on their religious belief."

http://www.christianpost.com/news/i...-license-to-discriminate-against-gays-115093/

 

[festeringZit]

I guarantee you, 95+% of the people in this country had no idea what this bill actually said. I wonder if the friggen governor of Arizona who vetoed it even knows...

 

[wabashwonders]

I guarantee you, 95+% of the people in this country had no idea what this bill actually said. I wonder if the friggen governor of Arizona who vetoed it even knows...

I guarantee you that 95% of the people in this country don't really give a fuck about this.

 

[wabashwonders]

I guarantee you, 95+% of the people in this country had no idea what this bill actually said. I wonder if the friggen governor of Arizona who vetoed it even knows...

You know for someone who feels this stuff is shoved down your throat all the time, you sure to like to talk about it a lot.

 

[festeringZit]

I guarantee you that 95% of the people in this country don't really give a fuck about this.

I guarantee you that you are wrong, as usual.

 

[wabashwonders]

I guarantee you that you are wrong, as usual.

And we all know that you are always right about about everything on here. Please tell me what I have been wrong about on here. If I am always wrong as you say.

 

[festeringZit]

And we all know that you are always right about about everything on here. Please tell me what I have been wrong about on here. If I am always wrong as you say.

Sure, just as soon as you show me your "guarantee the 95% of the people of this country don't give a F*ck about the Arizona law"

 

[neverbend]

This is pretty easy. If a gay couple wants to create as fuss by trying to select say an ultra-conservatively religous caterer or photographer
or band to perform at their wedding the way out for the selected religous fanatic would be to make there rate say 5000 when the going rate to say 1500. The gay couple would then have to choose another of other 50 or so merchants who provide comperable services.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

This is pretty easy. If a gay couple wants to create as fuss by trying to select say an ultra-conservatively religous caterer or photographer
or band to perform at their wedding the way out for the selected religous fanatic would be to make there rate say 5000 when the going rate to say 1500. The gay couple would then have to choose another of other 50 or so merchants who provide comperable services.

Sounds like a simple solution, however wouldn’t that force the government to set the rates?

It seems all roads are leading to Socialism.

 

[SheriffJoe]

The simplest solution is to tell these "cakes are a human right" lunatics to fuck off.

 

[ScottL]

The simplest solution is to tell lunatics like me to fuck off.

Fixed