It's a very easy problem to fix.
The U.N. imposes a peace plan on the parties and it is monitored and enforced by an International force.
This is a very old proposel that Israel refuses to accept.
Just now they bombed a U.N. facility in Gaza. It's burning out of control. They have absolutely no respect for International Laws or decency. Despite the conduct of the Israeli government since it's inception, the Jews there such not be punished and they deserve a state in that area.
The U.N. imposes a peace plan on the parties and it is monitored and enforced by an International force.
This is a very old proposel that Israel refuses to accept.
Just now they bombed a U.N. facility in Gaza. It's burning out of control. They have absolutely no respect for International Laws or decency. Despite the conduct of the Israeli government since it's inception, the Jews there such not be punished and they deserve a state in that area.
To prevent anyone claiming that the other side was getting favourable treatment I would designate the whole area as a nuclear waste dump, and deposit all the worlds' high level nuclear waste in an area centred on Jerusalem.
Nothing would be touched, nothing would be harmed, but 50-100 miles around Jerusalem would be completely uninhabitable by any christian, jew or muzzlim moron.
alas, we can only dream...
Nothing would be touched, nothing would be harmed, but 50-100 miles around Jerusalem would be completely uninhabitable by any christian, jew or muzzlim moron.
alas, we can only dream...
And if they keep murdering each other then this nuclear waste dump should be expanded by 20% per year, year on year, doubling in size every 5 years, until the killing stops.
It's just like smoking.
Even though there are only a minority of participants, we need a 100% blanket ban for the sake of everyones long term health.
It's just like smoking.
Even though there are only a minority of participants, we need a 100% blanket ban for the sake of everyones long term health.
Yeah, the UN is a fair arbiter.
Of course you left out that your terrorist buddies were firing from inside the building. Not that we'd expect to read the truth from you.
I got a better idea. How about Arabs accept the fact that Israel is an established fact and it isn't going anywhere. And stop shooting. Then Israel stops shooting back. Then negotiate.
Hamas fighters hiding in the building.LOL. Is that why Prime Minister Olmert apologized to Ban Ki-Moon?
I suppose you also believe that they have not used white phosphorous weapons indiscriminately in Gaza or that they did not ram that boat deliberately or that they didn't shoot fleeing civilians or purposely bomb warehouses that store U.N. relief supplies or turn away mercy boats with supplies.
What colour is the sky in the world you live in Scott?
Do you get paid to post bullshit on forums or are you just that stupid?
Did an amoral nitwit just call me stupid? Oh my!
http://honestreporting.com/articles/45884734/critiques/new/Media_War_Crimes.asp
Media 'War Crimes'
The latest media developments as Israel's campaign against Hamas continues.
<SCRIPT language=javascript>function titleFontChange(inc){ var fSize = document.getElementById('titleSpan').style.fontSize fSize = fSize.substring(0,2) if(Number(fSize)<23) fSize = 23; if(Number(fSize)>32) fSize = 32; document.getElementById('titleSpan').style.fontSize = (Number(fSize) + inc) +"px";}</SCRIPT>http://switch3.castup.net/cunet/gm.asp?ai=58&ar=HumanitarianActionsIDF-140109-V&ak=nullPHOSPHORUS CHARGES REBUKED
Accusations that Israel employs sinister and "illegal" weapons are not new. Now, the politicized non-governmental organization Human Rights Watch has condemned Israel for allegedly using white phosphorus weapons unlawfully in the conflict with Hamas. NGOs such as HRW enjoy the "halo effect", whereby, because of their humanitarian focus, they are insulated from scrutiny and are regarded as above reproach by the media. In this case, media including The Guardian, Times of London, Christian Science Monitor and CNN have repeated HRW's claims.
However, this charge has been disputed by the International Red Cross, which stated that it had no evidence to suggest that white phosphorus is being used improperly or illegally by Israel. As the AP reports:
"In some of the strikes in Gaza it's pretty clear that phosphorus was used," [Peter] Herby told The Associated Press. "But it's not very unusual to use phosphorus to create smoke or illuminate a target. We have no evidence to suggest it's being used in any other way." ...
Herby said that using phosphorus to illuminate a target or create smoke is legitimate under international law, and that there was no evidence the Jewish state was intentionally using phosphorus in a questionable way, such as burning down buildings or consciously putting civilians at risk.
White phosphorus has, however, been used as a weapon against civilians during this conflict... by Hamas. On Tuesday a mortar shell fired from Gaza into Israel contained white phosphorus. As the regional council's security chief said: "the potential danger of using such a rocket is enormous. It is far more dangerous than other Qassam rockets and mortal shells. This is an escalation in the type of explosives the Palestinians use on civilians."Herby said that using phosphorus to illuminate a target or create smoke is legitimate under international law, and that there was no evidence the Jewish state was intentionally using phosphorus in a questionable way, such as burning down buildings or consciously putting civilians at risk.
We challenge Human Rights Watch to condemn this attack in the same way it has (falsely) condemned Israel.
See NGO Monitor for more on HRW and its role in spreading the white phosphorus charge in the media.
Will the international media condemn or even report on this development? We won't hold our breath.
BBC THROWS JOURNALISTIC INTEGRITY OUT OF THE WINDOW
<CENTER>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sWcAawkvM0</CENTER>
The article states that "BBC journalists in Gaza and Israel have compiled detailed accounts of the claims." Who are these BBC journalists in Gaza? On the basis that foreign press have not been allowed access to Gaza, one can only assume that these supposedly neutral observers are, in fact, Palestinians. This seems to be confirmed by a footnote in the story: "Research and reporting by Hamada Abu Qammar in Gaza and Heather Sharp, Fouad Abu Ghosh and Raya el-Din in Jerusalem."
So the BBC is relying on a Palestinian 'journalist' and Palestinian 'eyewitnesses' in Gaza along with others who are nowhere near the conflict zone. This form of agenda-driven reporting sees the BBC sinking to new moral lows.
That an excellent source youv'e quoted Scott. They even claim to have over 155,000 subcribers! and some of them are not even Jewish. I'll bet the people at New York Times are shaking in thier boots.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090115/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_palestinians
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1NwI0EKdRLY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1NwI0EKdRLY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090115/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_palestinians
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1NwI0EKdRLY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1NwI0EKdRLY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
You're just peaved because another canard against Israel, white phosphorus, has been set aside.
A POS like you wouldn't accept any pro-Israel source as valid so don't deflect the argument. Israel is fighting a defensive war against radical Islamic terrorists trying to destroy it because it's a Jewish State. You support the terrorists. You are an amoral scumbag.
