the only people who know are him and mcnamee.
and you are right, there is no tangible proof, importantly no checks that were so prominantly put in the report. and of course, there is no failed drug test, since, ya know, IT WASN'T BANNED OR TESTED FOR AT THE TIME!
so it comes down to strictly one persons word against another. is that enough to put it in a report and tarnish a HOF career? i guess thats in the eye of the beholder, but i think that this entire report has alot of holes and question marks...
This Prick has been on the juice for years...I dont need the inept MLB to tell me who and who wasnt on the juice...the public should have figured this out the minute Brady Anderson hit his 50th homer...back in 96....What kind of idiot mistakes a bat for a ball?.......lol....fuck Clemons..I respect his game regardless if he took them or not...but this guys card needs to be pulled...hes a bigger jackass than Bonds ever was....
you are an idiot, plain and simple. first off, clemens is hated in boston, so i don't know what that has to do with anything.
pete rose broke baseball's rule: no gambling on baseball, and it was proven.
at the time clemens did steroids: THEY WEREN'T BANNED BY MLB! he didn't break any of the sports rules!
therefore, one broke a rule of the sport, the other didn't.
and by no means am i saying clemens is innocent, but there is absolutely no proof he did anything, unlike rose.
Wait? They were banned AUTOMATICALLY. It was a given that they were banned. Want to know why? Because they were fucking illegal ass clown. Just because murdering someone on the field isn't against the MLB play book doesn't mean the league wouldn't ban the player.
Where in the NFL rule book does it say you can't fight dogs? Oh wait it doesn't but odds are Vick will be suspended from the league for the incident because it is against the fucking law.
I think it is much worse to break a rule of the nation than a rule of the sport. And Clemens did steroids while they were illegal. What you think he suddenly stopped when baseball made it illegal haha? Is that what you think? You think his sub 3 ERA at the age of 43 with Houston was done legitimately. He was just like oh I don't need them anymore?
He is just as bad as Bonds, if not worse. It's funny I bet you were one of the people that ripped bonds to shreds.
Wait Bonds never failed a drug test did he? So there is no proof, but he was forced to testify in front of a grand jury where he had to admit to using steroids. Lets put Clemens in front of a grand juror and see what he says.
CLEMENS IS A CHEATER, LIAR, and CROOK.
And there is plenty of proof. A guy who is under investigation and more than likely wouldn't lie because he could face more charges, said he shot Clemens up with Steroids.
Why is it obvious that Bonds did it but not Clemens? Your biased opinion is a joke.
Also Rose cheating didn't affect the game in any way, shape, or form. It has been proven he never bet against his team.
Roger cheated the game and affected how it was played. Rose didn't. Rose's crime was much less than Roger's.
Roger is about as clear of a cheater as Bonds.
clemens wasn't part of balco. they don't have the records and calenders like they do with bonds and anderson.
all they have is an ex-trainers word. who's to say who is lying? is an ex-trainer trying to avoid jailtime really evidence? there are no cancelled checks or fedex shipments like they have on the other guys on the list today.
to think he is innocent is naive, but this evidence is nowhere near is bad as it is to bonds.
and like i said, i really could care less if any of these guys used, and it is a witch hunt, mostly to make uncle bud look good.
