Can't believe the Nats RRL was some where like +280. Anyone remember the official number?
KingofNicotine New member Joined Jun 3, 2009 Messages 13,242 Tokens Aug 25, 2009 #1 Can't believe the Nats RRL was some where like +280. Anyone remember the official number?
FairWarning Official Rx music critic and beer snob Joined Jun 21, 2003 Messages 25,128 Tokens Aug 25, 2009 #2 +280 at 5 Dimes. Also have -2.5 +400. I am playing these every day vs my Cubbies.
gynecologist Banned Joined Jan 19, 2006 Messages 30,208 Tokens Aug 25, 2009 #3 +235 was way too high.. I think the books made a mistake on this one for sure..
FairWarning Official Rx music critic and beer snob Joined Jun 21, 2003 Messages 25,128 Tokens Aug 25, 2009 #4 gynecologist said: +235 was way too high.. I think the books made a mistake on this one for sure.. Click to expand... No they didn't. According to SportsOptions, 89% of public money on the Cubs. Gyno, just fade them every day and thank me at the end of the year.
gynecologist said: +235 was way too high.. I think the books made a mistake on this one for sure.. Click to expand... No they didn't. According to SportsOptions, 89% of public money on the Cubs. Gyno, just fade them every day and thank me at the end of the year.
jordan17 Rx Local Motion Joined Oct 17, 2007 Messages 46,313 Tokens Aug 25, 2009 #5 gNats killing cunts...
gynecologist Banned Joined Jan 19, 2006 Messages 30,208 Tokens Aug 25, 2009 #6 FairWarning said: No they didn't. According to SportsOptions, 89% of public money on the Cubs. Gyno, just fade them every day and thank me at the end of the year. Click to expand... Thats hard to believe, considering the Nats bats have been performing better and the Cubs pitcher was coming off the DL.
FairWarning said: No they didn't. According to SportsOptions, 89% of public money on the Cubs. Gyno, just fade them every day and thank me at the end of the year. Click to expand... Thats hard to believe, considering the Nats bats have been performing better and the Cubs pitcher was coming off the DL.
FairWarning Official Rx music critic and beer snob Joined Jun 21, 2003 Messages 25,128 Tokens Aug 25, 2009 #7 gynecologist said: Thats hard to believe, considering the Nats bats have been performing better and the Cubs pitcher was coming off the DL. Click to expand... Cubs are such a public team.
gynecologist said: Thats hard to believe, considering the Nats bats have been performing better and the Cubs pitcher was coming off the DL. Click to expand... Cubs are such a public team.
RedElephants Member Joined Mar 9, 2007 Messages 14,157 Tokens Aug 25, 2009 #8 Don't look now but tomorrow the line is -290 and pushing higher.
FairWarning Official Rx music critic and beer snob Joined Jun 21, 2003 Messages 25,128 Tokens Aug 25, 2009 #9 RedElephants said: Don't look now but tomorrow the line is -290 and pushing higher. Click to expand... It would take real balls to take Wash vs Harden, but the Cubs are not hitting at all. I will take a flier in the 5-inning under.
RedElephants said: Don't look now but tomorrow the line is -290 and pushing higher. Click to expand... It would take real balls to take Wash vs Harden, but the Cubs are not hitting at all. I will take a flier in the 5-inning under.
djmatt New member Joined Feb 7, 2007 Messages 3,142 Tokens Aug 26, 2009 #10 Zambrano was throwing meatballs... but the wind wasn't blowing out just for Nats, cubs=dead