What was The Committee looking at? They took one of the Strongest Seasons

RedElephants · Mar 13, 2016

And turned it into complete garbage with seeds and teams left out. Vandy? Texas Tech? Oregon? Tulsa? Michigan? Syracuse?

Over teams like St Bonnie, Valpo, St Mary's, South Carolina and Monmouth, Pitt?

Kentucky a 4 seed? Are you kidding me? Vandy in over South Carolina?

Worst analysis in College Basketball history.

bukis1 · Mar 13, 2016

I knew it was going to be bad at the first segment. Msu a # 2 seed? Agree vandy mi tx tech shouldn't be in. Monmouth got screwed.

StevieRay · Mar 13, 2016

Still scratching my head

rivera42 · Mar 13, 2016

Not to mention the two highest seeded teams, NC and Kansas have far more difficult draws than The other regions. Kentucky a 4? AM a 3? Even if before today, poor. Monmouth and SC miss and Syracuse and Michigan get in?

RedElephants · Mar 13, 2016

Michigan beat 4 Teams that are in the NCAA, Texas Maryland, Purdue and Indiana......3 which retaliated and beat Michigan as well.....two of them by double digits......and Purdue beat them by double digits TWICE.

RedElephants · Mar 13, 2016

Michigan St at #2 is bullshit and Kentucky at 4 is even worse. And what....did the whole fucking Pac 12 get in?

RedElephants · Mar 13, 2016

If you weren't going to let St Marys in then Gonzaga sure as hell is not an 11 either.

RedElephants · Mar 13, 2016

How does Utah after a 40 pt drubbing be worthy of a 3?

RedElephants · Mar 13, 2016

Butler at 9 is pathetic. Beat Temple Cincinnati and Purdue which all have an equal or better seed.

919 · Mar 13, 2016

It's all garbage

cordial · Mar 13, 2016

919 said:
It's all garbage

919...Why, in your opinion, are they all garbage?

RedElephants · Mar 13, 2016

We obviously know who the strong Conference Commissioners are? One would have thought the SEC had one......There was at LEAST 1 too many teams in from Pac 12, Big 12 and Big Ten. And let me tell you, a team like Pittsburgh and anyone else close in the ACC who had to play UNC, Miami, and Virginia deserve to be in over those last teams that got in. All 3 are some of the best in the Country and it created some ACC losses for some good teams better than that last shit they stuck to the wall.

OK I'm done ranting....

RedElephants · Mar 13, 2016

No I'm not Monmouth beat USC AND UCLA, Georgetown, and Notre Dame. Lost to Dayton by 3. Damn you fucking idiots......

They say get rid of the cream puff schedule and you can get in with a strong RPI....well HELL MONMOUTH DID. And still had a damn strong record, and STILL DIDN'T GET IN.

Get some damn rules and stick to them!!!!!

919 · Mar 13, 2016

cordial said:
919...Why, in your opinion, are they all garbage?

I was referring to the committee's F Up. They tell the smaller schools that they have to play the big boys on the road. Monmouth does that and wins those games. But they still don't get in. I was agreeing with everything Red said in his first post

919 · Mar 13, 2016

RedElephants said:
No I'm not Monmouth beat USC AND UCLA, Georgetown, and Notre Dame. Lost to Dayton by 3. Damn you fucking idiots......

They say get rid of the cream puff schedule and you can get in with a strong RPI....well HELL MONMOUTH DID. And still had a damn strong record, and STILL DIDN'T GET IN.

Get some damn rules and stick to them!!!!!

Exactly. They just move the goal posts and put their buddies in even though they don't deserve it

RedElephants · Mar 13, 2016

Valpo beat Oregon St and Iona, lost by 6 to Oregon and only had 2 Conference losses. I'm not sure what the message was here today but something STINKS IN SHIT TOWN. The message was Win that 1 Conference Tournament Game or you are toast. Your body of work over the season means NOTHING if you are a small school, including scheduling a strong non conference, but it DOES MEAN SOMETHING if you are Vandy or Syracuse. Hell Michigan doesn't even have a BODY!

cordial · Mar 13, 2016

919 said:
I was referring to the committee's F Up. They tell the smaller schools that they have to play the big boys on the road. Monmouth does that and wins those games. But they still don't get in. I was agreeing with everything Red said in his first post

Thank you for your response...as of yet, I have not seen the committee ranking's. From what I've read, there must be major (flaws/bias) in their ranking?

MackDonald · Mar 13, 2016

It all eventually gets back to the money ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$). The schools that have huge fan support resulting in the "ol ball park" filling-up. Presto: You are awarded a tournament slot. You're right RED, the system does stink to High Heaven.

RedElephants · Mar 13, 2016

As a Member of the SEC I would not even be pissed about them only getting 3 teams in if those slots had gone to Monmouth, Valpo at a minimum. Not fucking Texas Pathetic Tech and Oregon Distemper St, and I Beat Nobody Michigan. You don't leave South Carolina out for those 3 teams.

919 · Mar 13, 2016

cordial said:
Thank you for your response...as of yet, I have not seen the committee ranking's. From what I've read, there must be major (flaws/bias) in their ranking?

https://mobile.twitter.com/marchmadness/status/709150474797236224

committee rankings