Why would this even be debatable? Think of it this way, If a high school kid can play whatever sport you mention at the same rate of energy exertion a professional does then that sport is not that tough. High school kids play soccer games on back to back weeks for the full 90 minutes same as pros.
I disagree with that because you can't compare a high school team with a professional team like Barcelona or other elite teams: They might play for the same amount of time every weekend, but at a way slower pace with far less movement/running involved.
I agree with you on soccer though, I highly doubt it's soccer: Even a professional player averages just 8-14km during a 90min match and that includes a lot of walking and light jogging. And those numbers of 8-14km go down very quickly once you go down in leagues: In an amateur league it's probably way below 10km on average, probably closer to 6-8km. You also get lots of breaks because of fouls, corner/free kicks, halftime and during the ball being a play, but on the other end of the field.
Indoor soccer/futsal or in general 5on5 soccer on a much shorter pitch is way more exhausting because of the higher pace and constant moving around (although you run shorter distances), so I might rate that higher than basketball.
But I still would rate them lower than long distance running or duathlon/triathlon, even though you can't really compare these two because they require a different kind of stamina, so it might differ because of the person you ask. The long distance sports require you to maintain a certain speed for a long period of time, while sports like futsal, basketball etc. test your skills/stamina in interval running, therefore accelerating and sprinting rather short distances over and over again. So although your overall distance is way lower, the short intervals all put you under high stress.