Once again, I don't know what this line should be priced, but it seems to me that the 2-way line is a bad deal, because what you really want to bet on is "Will it be a TD or FG".
Don't tell me you are honestly worried about a safety coming up. So by betting into the 2-way line, you are basically paying for the odds of the Safety when you don't care about it. Find a 3 way line and bet the FG or TD by themselves, and you should get a better price. If a safety happens, write it off to a fluke and move on.
Don't tell me you are honestly worried about a safety coming up. So by betting into the 2-way line, you are basically paying for the odds of the Safety when you don't care about it. Find a 3 way line and bet the FG or TD by themselves, and you should get a better price. If a safety happens, write it off to a fluke and move on.
Yes. Wunderdog. I saw the Td -125 up last night and I thought that seemed very low for any game let alone a game with strong Offenses and not so strong Defenses.
Most all games have the TD as a favorite on that prop, and this game being a 47 1/2 total I felt should have the TD as a bigger chalk. Problem was that I couldnt find a line on that prop at any other book last night to make sure.
I checked this morning and Olympic had the FG or safety at +140 and I still got the TD -125 at Intertops.
Most all games have the TD as a favorite on that prop, and this game being a 47 1/2 total I felt should have the TD as a bigger chalk. Problem was that I couldnt find a line on that prop at any other book last night to make sure.
I checked this morning and Olympic had the FG or safety at +140 and I still got the TD -125 at Intertops.
Danny.. well seeing as you can get a 15-cent scalp by all means have at that line.
I wasn't talking about scalping. I was saying the average bettor wanting to gamble on one side of the prop should take:
FG +150
instead of FG+Safety +140
as an example.
As in my opinion in the long run those 10 cents would pay for the occasional crazy-ass safety. Hell 5 cents would probably pay for the occasional safety.
I'd Imagine the odds of a safety hitting on any given first score of the game are beyond 20-1... aren't they?
I wasn't talking about scalping. I was saying the average bettor wanting to gamble on one side of the prop should take:
FG +150
instead of FG+Safety +140
as an example.
As in my opinion in the long run those 10 cents would pay for the occasional crazy-ass safety. Hell 5 cents would probably pay for the occasional safety.
I'd Imagine the odds of a safety hitting on any given first score of the game are beyond 20-1... aren't they?
