What is wrong with this?

[krackman]

Why would a book not want to accept these wagers?

Internet/-1 Jun-3 8:42:35 PM

PARLAY (4 TEAMS)
[907] SFO o11+185 ( J WILLIAMS -R / B WEBB -R )
[908] ARI ML+102 ( ACTION )
[915] TOR o11+300 ( M BATISTA -R / B ZITO -L )
[916] OAK -1½+134 ( M BATISTA -R / B ZITO -L ) 100/5289


Internet/-1 Jun-3 8:47:43 PM

PARLAY (6 TEAMS)
[907] SFO o11+185 ( J WILLIAMS -R / B WEBB -R )
[908] ARI ML+102 ( ACTION )
[915] TOR o11+300 ( M BATISTA -R / B ZITO -L )
[916] OAK -1½+134 ( M BATISTA -R / B ZITO -L )
[917] CLE ML+136 ( ACTION )
[917] CLE o7-188 ( C LEE -L / K ESCO BAR -R ) 300/58144

 

[wilheim]

Beside the losers? Not sure.


wil.

 

[docdekay]

Because certain shops deem the RL/total parlay as correlated.

Very few books still allow the -1.5/o and +1.5/u

 

[krackman]

Thanks Doc

 

[sickgambler]

you kidding me??? how can you say these games are correlated?? Not a chance they are.

 

[docdekay]

The games arent correlated with one another. The RL/total w/in the same game are correlated according to certain shops.

 

[WildBill]

I think a RL and regular total is one thing, but there definitely is some correlation with a RL and a "super" total like that. Books take on some risk letting a player bet a regular total and RL, but the added odds they give with a super total is probably more risk than they should be taking. After all if a game goes to 12 runs or more the chances of a team winning by 2 runs is quite high and if a book is paying out 3-1 on that total then I can't blame them for blocking the parlay to a RL.

 

[Fishhead]

Your overlooking another factor also.......some books do not allow a four team parlay that involves all dogs.

 

[JimFiestSux]

I have yet to see any book accept a parlay involving the total & run line on same game!

 

[RayB]

Krackman,

Please call:

 

[Railbird]

OVER 11 +185 is considered a prop bet and you cant parlay prop bets

 

[Railbird]

and you are skirting limits, trying to win 58K