Not at all.
Over the past 5+ years there's been a gradually expanding network of trustworthy individuals who serve as agents for the various offshore and overseas sportsbooks.
That network will simply expand and within another five years we'll likely all have on hand several trustworthy names of people to who we can legally send money who will then reliably place it with our desired sportsbook.
That network will simply expand and within another five years we'll likely all have on hand several trustworthy names of people to who we can legally send money who will then reliably place it with our desired sportsbook.
Isn't that "whom" ?
How is it legal ?
At the rate we're going wont be long an offshore wont want American money anyway....Their toilet paper sheets will be worth more...
It's still a patchwork deal sending money to persons in Nicaragua and Bulgaria, always a different name.
How many will still want to send if MG/WU are required to collect detailed data from the sender ?
They ( gov't) will tighten that up, restricting the flow of cash.
I agree w/ the grim outlook. I don't think it matters if offshore books expand their existing foreign agents who receive deposits from US customers b/c the problem is you still have to use WU or MG
*Literally tens of thousands of people send money legally and without hassle from the USA to international destinations every single day.
*If Moneygram and WU begin to exert undue hassles on their patrons, competing businesses will take their business.
Who directly competes with MG/WU, Steve ?
There are currently dozens of ways to legally transfer money internationally and more will develop in coming months as the global economy expands
Dozens ?
Maybe MG/WU, bankwires, CC's,Fed-ex a Cashiers' check, International MO, Carrier pigeon, what are 20 more ways ?
*The "government" can try and tighten up all they want. But there will still be literally billions of dollars moving internationally every 24 hours. And enterprising people will have little trouble finding channels.
Basically, this short thread here is a microcosm of the same concerns expressed five years ago when Netteller said they would no longer move money from the USA to anything remotely tied to offshore gambling.
And here we are five years later and the offshore gambling industry has no trouble receiving or sending money pretty much anywhere they want.
Basically, this short thread here is a microcosm of the same concerns expressed five years ago when Netteller said they would no longer move money from the USA to anything remotely tied to offshore gambling.
And here we are five years later and the offshore gambling industry has no trouble receiving or sending money pretty much anywhere they want.