Look for KC to take this one. I would say offences are both good, defences not so good. It's in arrowhead.
I think this would could go either way, depending on TO's perhaps
Althought the stat that worries me is that INDY has beat KC in the last 5 meetings.
Does anyone know how Indy plays away from home on grass?
I think this would could go either way, depending on TO's perhaps
Althought the stat that worries me is that INDY has beat KC in the last 5 meetings.
Does anyone know how Indy plays away from home on grass?
In regards to Indy, they are very weak in the secondary. For this reason, teams will stay with them and have a chance to win as the colts may be offensive firepower, but by doing this, they force the other team to throw and that is playing right into the colts biggest weakness. If I coached against Indy, I would throw 80% and be glad to get into a shootout. Most teams in the league have a huge advantage in the defensive backs.
i like Jax - no opinion on the other 2
having said that - taking +1 in the Jax game is a BAD BET - and here is why
what are the odds of the Jags losing the game and STILL covering (or in this case - pushing) the number?
VERY, VERY, VERY, VERY slim
what i make a habit of doing is ANYTIME the dog is LESS than -3 i NEVER take the points - i ALWAYS play the M/L figuring i might as well get the extra $.25 to about $.35 per play than taking the dog and the points for like i said - MOST of the time the dog has to win to cover anyway - so why not bet them on the M/L.
having said that - taking +1 in the Jax game is a BAD BET - and here is why
what are the odds of the Jags losing the game and STILL covering (or in this case - pushing) the number?
VERY, VERY, VERY, VERY slim
what i make a habit of doing is ANYTIME the dog is LESS than -3 i NEVER take the points - i ALWAYS play the M/L figuring i might as well get the extra $.25 to about $.35 per play than taking the dog and the points for like i said - MOST of the time the dog has to win to cover anyway - so why not bet them on the M/L.
