What are the ucla/Stanford refs looking at?

Search

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
333
Tokens
If they don't call targeting on that they won't the rest of the year. Pretty blatant if you ask me
 

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
686
Tokens
Baffling and then I think the fumble was caused by ground. Gutless pukes in replay booth.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
333
Tokens
You'd think that crew is gonna have a suspension coming no? They reviewed it and still didn't make the call. It's pathetic
 

New member
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
1,946
Tokens
That's not incompetence. That's corrupt officiating.

They are trying to help UCLA.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
2
Tokens
Yep, no doubt this game is fixed. Not only was it the very definition of targeting, the ground caused the fumble...and the "corrupt" official said "interception" at the end of the call. This game is so fixed it's a friggin' joke, just like that a-hole coach of Stanford, didn't even question the fumble.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
2
Tokens
4th and 1 with 4 min left and you punt? Did that jack ass Shaw forget he has a Heisman RB in McCaffery? He has to be the worst coach in the Big 5 conference.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,955
Messages
13,575,566
Members
100,888
Latest member
bj88gameslife
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com