Whack Job Pence: Abortion will end in U.S. 'in our time'

Search
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,814
Tokens
[ When DemoScum create a culture of killing babies, what difference does it make if you stab and kill it one minute before birth, or one minute after? ]

[h=1]Texas girl, 17, stabs newborn to death minutes after giving birth, police say[/h]By Ray Bogan | Fox News






[h=4]Texas teen charged with killing her minutes old baby[/h]A 17-year-old from Texas is facing a capital murder charge after police say she stabbed her months old baby nine times and put it in a shed.




A 17-year-old Texas girl repeatedly stabbed her newborn just minutes after it was born then dumped the body at a neighbor’s home and went to sleep, police said.
Erica Gomez of El Paso faces capital murder charges for the Feb. 9 killing.
“I cannot understand what she was thinking or feeling,” said Erica Martinez, who told KFOXshe was Gomez’s confirmation teacher.
According to court documents, Gomez admitted to giving birth in her bathroom, wrapping the baby in a bathrobe, and putting it in a shed at her neighbor’s house. She then went back inside her home and fell asleep.
1519759309229.jpg

Erica Gomez, 17, is charged with capital murder for allegedly killing her minutes old baby and putting it in a shed. (El Paso County Sheriff)


Gomez didn't tell anyone because she was scared, according to police.
While she was sleeping, Gomez’s mother noticed she was bleeding and took her to the hospital. Doctors at the hospital told Gomez she had a miscarriage.
The newborn’s body was eventually found by a 13-year-old neighbor who entered his shed and made the grisly discovery. Police determined the baby had been left in the shed for 12 hours, from the time of birth until the boy found it.
“It really upsets me, children shouldn’t be abused,” said Thomas Moreno, who lives on the street where the incident happened.
The baby had been stabbed nine times – three times on the neck, once on the side and five times in the back. Forensic Examiner Doctor Janice Diaz determined the death was a homicide.
Gomez was arrested on Feb. 23. She is being held at El Paso County jail on $800,000 bond.


 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
Here you go idiot......

Recent research from the Pew Research Center indicates that 69 percent of Americans — or 7 in 10 — say Roe v. Wade should not be completely overturned. This represents a 6-point increase in the number of individuals who expressed this sentiment just a few years ago.

Never forget...

I will refrain from childish name calling as I am a man- not an adolescent. You are epitomizing exactly what rolltide exposed down here.
 

BZ

RX Original
Joined
Oct 21, 2001
Messages
17,531
Tokens
We all know Pence is a religious whack job- and if any of you truly believed in "constitutional rights" you would understand his religious views have no business in the federal government.

And I love how you "anti-choice conservatives" only believe in small government and personal liberty when it is your personal, subjective, and contestable views of freedom that get to carry the day. Such hypocrisy.

If you really favored private decision-making and personal freedom, then you should favor pro-choice every time.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
We all know Pence is a religious whack job- and if any of you truly believed in "constitutional rights" you would understand his religious views have no business in the federal government.

And I love how you "anti-choice conservatives" only believe in small government and personal liberty when it is your personal, subjective, and contestable views of freedom that get to carry the day. Such hypocrisy.

If you really favored private decision-making and personal freedom, then you should favor pro-choice every time.

Don't you think abortion is a little different than other issues that Republicans have used to make a mockery of small government and personal freedom (and I agree with you that they have with many issues)? Murder is a illegal in this country, therefore, if you think abortion is murder, why would you ever favor pro-choice? This argument makes more sense for an issue like gay marriage.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
On a sidebar, I'm beginning to wonder why we fight to stop liberals from killing each other. Both before they're born and when they grow up. Maybe we should just let them be the scumbags that they are, then we'd have to deal with fewer of them.
Did you just stumble upon the "cure"?
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
I would say the chances of banning abortions are about the same as banning guns.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,807
Tokens
We all know Pence is a religious whack job- and if any of you truly believed in "constitutional rights" you would understand his religious views have no business in the federal government.

And I love how you "anti-choice conservatives" only believe in small government and personal liberty when it is your personal, subjective, and contestable views of freedom that get to carry the day. Such hypocrisy.

If you really favored private decision-making and personal freedom, then you should favor pro-choice every time.

when does a baby have constitutional rights? and why?



on a sidebar

is it worse to kill something that should be alive or to argue something should live rather than be killed?
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,807
Tokens

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,469
Tokens
Here you go idiot......

Recent research from the Pew Research Center indicates that 69 percent of Americans — or 7 in 10 — say Roe v. Wade should not be completely overturned. This represents a 6-point increase in the number of individuals who expressed this sentiment just a few years ago.

Uh, overturn Roe != "pro choice"

I presented a poll specifically asking about the term pro-choice.

It is hilarious watching someone with your IQ pretend they are clever.
 

BZ

RX Original
Joined
Oct 21, 2001
Messages
17,531
Tokens
1. Religion has no business in government- needs to be separation of church and state just like our founding gun-barring forefathers intended.
2. You can't pick and choose which personal freedoms you support or don't. Just like free speech. I don't agree with the white supremacists gathering and spewing their hatred, but under the constitution the have the right to do it.
3. Republicans continue to infringe on many personal freedoms.
4. Pence is a religious whack job.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,814
Tokens
1. Religion has no business in government- needs to be separation of church and state just like our founding gun-barring forefathers intended.
2. You can't pick and choose which personal freedoms you support or don't. Just like free speech. I don't agree with the white supremacists gathering and spewing their hatred, but under the constitution the have the right to do it.
3. Republicans continue to infringe on many personal freedoms.
4. Pence is a religious whack job.

The idea that killing babies should be legal because of "a separation of church and state" is a total non-sequitur. If you had half a brain you wouldn't
be parroting such inanity.

The founding fathers didn't intend a separation of church and state, that is a lie pushed by the liberal lying left. As a matter of fact, most early state constitutions
*required* government employees to sign a document stating that they were Christians.


For example, Delaware constitution:

[h=2]Delaware's constitution is typical of the understanding of the authors of the federal constitutions 1st amendment meant as to what constitutes the establishment of religion by the state. In Article 22 a common sense oath is required to affirm an office holder in the state is at least a nominal Christian. The people of Delaware had real world experience in the characters and nature of men. In founding their state they preferred to take their chances among professing Christians in offices of trust verses those who reject Christ and the moral demands he makes of people. Article 29 demonstrates the mindset of the day in the new nation that the oaths in Article 22 isn't establishing a religion. In acknowledging that they regard the scriptures as of divine origin to the exclusion of all of the religions of the world. In other words they considered those religions false. That's only one side of the coin. The other side of that coin is the recognition of the frailties of men and their propensities toward sin. Therefore they understood that neither the citizens nor especially the state possessed the wherewithal to determine the truth as laid out in those scriptures for their neighbor. In todays mindset this constitutes the establishment of one religion over the other, but not in theirs. The establishment of one religion over another to them was a vehicle of evil men to separate the ruled from personnel interaction with their creator and to weed out and destroy the propagators of real religion. This does nothing of the sort but instead recognizes the real world limits of human government and the dangers of immoral men wielding it's power. Does this constitution imply that people not endeavoring to follow Christ are more likely to be immoral and wicked. Absolutely! Does it force Christianity on the public? No, the means to bring the public to true faith belonged not to human government to to those called of God and their churches. Besides the public already considered themselves to be Christians.[/h]
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
1. Religion has no business in government- needs to be separation of church and state just like our founding gun-barring forefathers intended.
2. You can't pick and choose which personal freedoms you support or don't. Just like free speech. I don't agree with the white supremacists gathering and spewing their hatred, but under the constitution the have the right to do it.
3. Republicans continue to infringe on many personal freedoms.
4. Pence is a religious whack job.
1. Religion has no business in anything. It's a private matter for
those who choose to participate.
2. Sure you can. By definition that's what freedom is all about.
3. Of course they do. Just out of curiosity, which many personal freedoms
would those be?
4. Pence is a religious man. Until he starts speaking in tongues and
sacrificing virgins I won't call him a whack job.
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
78,326
Tokens
mike-pence.jpg
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
78,326
Tokens
160720-kucinich-mike-pence-tease-2_mq8cgq
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
78,326
Tokens
cc9f839e-c635-11e7-9f2b-5c6b06d31424-780x557.jpg
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
78,326
Tokens
Q7ER7HFUC5H3PBNR2AN5NCYGXU.jpg
 

BZ

RX Original
Joined
Oct 21, 2001
Messages
17,531
Tokens
The founding fathers didn't intend a separation of church and state, that is a lie pushed by the liberal lying left.

Killing babies is tpical lying right bullshit.

On to your other lie: On January 1, 1802, President Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to the Baptists of Danbury, Connecticut, who had requested clarification about the meaning of the First Amendment to the Constitution. Jefferson described the Establishment Clause of First Amendment by writing, “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibit the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state.”
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,814
Tokens
Killing babies is tpical lying right bullshit.

On to your other lie: On January 1, 1802, President Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to the Baptists of Danbury, Connecticut, who had requested clarification about the meaning of the First Amendment to the Constitution. Jefferson described the Establishment Clause of First Amendment by writing, “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibit the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state.”

You made a general statement about our forefathers. You were lying... Actually you're just painfully ignorant. And, then you google and find a statement in a letter Jefferson wrote in 1802, talking about
NOT ALLOWING THE GOVERNMENT TO FORCE A SPECIFIC RELIGION ON THE PEOPLE, and that's what
you're clinging to.

Ignorant hack.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,814
Tokens
Killing babies is tpical lying right bullshit.

On to your other lie: On January 1, 1802, President Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to the Baptists of Danbury, Connecticut, who had requested clarification about the meaning of the First Amendment to the Constitution. Jefferson described the Establishment Clause of First Amendment by writing, “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibit the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state.”

Read what the letter was actually about you stupid political hack.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baptists_in_the_history_of_separation_of_church_and_state
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,337
Messages
13,459,105
Members
99,469
Latest member
herbalinfusion
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com