Week 3: Still Underrated

Search

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
Houston, by the looks of the spread, is not getting due respect. Onto that later.

Last week: Hit my first 3 posted plays, a 3*, a 4* and a 5*(changed to a 5* later in the thread). Hopefully no one paid any attention to the smaller plays that followed. They were mostly a disaster. By Friday, I had too much time on my hands and was looking for those "jewels", those plays that I might have missed earlier in the week. Some of them I stand by, and lost, others were just reaching….getting sucked in by a line that looked too good to be true(Kentucky +16 was a good example). I did this in the bowl season(25-16, +47 units), hitting my larger plays, and losing the majority of the smaller ones. Too many plays, too much searching for action for dubious reasons.

Now 13-13, + 6.05 units I will still be playing a few smaller plays. Let me lose my own money, hold onto yours. In reading others write-ups I can form a better opinion of a game/ a team, but not necessarily bet it.

4* Houston -7(-120) If another team(a SEC or Big 10 or Big 12 team say) beat Florida State in a bowl game by 14, scoring 38 on one of the nation's best defenses, and then began this year winning AT Oklahoma by 10 (Oklahoma scored 7 in garbage time), would they only be a 7 point favorite playing the Cinn. Bearcats, a team that lives and dies by their offense? No of course not. That Oklahoma win was no fluke either. The media played up the 109 yard FG return, but Houston dominated in other ways. They swarmed to the ball on defense, tackling well…they got the "push" on the DL, limiting greatly the great Sooner running game. If Baker Mayfield wasn't such an escape artist, the passing game might have flopped too. Houston's offense also outplayed the Oklahoma defense, and their receivers were getting open often. If Greg Ward hadn't missed a few deep open WRs, this score could have been uglier.

It's not just one game either. Tom Herman might be the new Chris Petersen, getting an incredible amount of success out of limited talent. Herman and his excellent coaching staff relate well to players and demand perfection on the practice field. This tough love approach, along with Herman's and Major Applewhite's creative offensive scheming, has Houston playing as well as anybody not named Alabama. And I'm not sure Houston's talent is that limited. They looked fast and athletic on the field vs. Oklahoma. If Greg Ward can pinpoint his passes a bit better, and he should be able to considering the Bearcats so-so secondary and weak pass rush, this could be a 17+ victory. Ward sat out the Lamar game, but is practicing all week and will not be limited.

Cinn. has beaten Purdue and UT Martin. It's hard to say where they are at. They'll be pumped for this game, but so will Houston. The Cougs know they have to run the table to get a spot in the championship playoff. With a Texas State on deck, there's no look ahead. Cincinnatti's QB, Hayden Moore, is still living off his record setting day last year vs. Memphis. In back to back games, he looked terrific. But overall, I think he's a bit overrated. He has a all new receiving corps and certainly hasn't been tested this year by anything resembling a quality defense. I just don't think Cinn. has the personnel to contain Ward and all the other facets of this Houston offense.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
53,738
Tokens
Fred.........lov the play.........continue your winning ways this week.............indy
 

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2016
Messages
19
Tokens
I agree 100%. Got in on it at Houston -7. They rested Greg Ward and have had basically 2 weeks to prepare for this while Cincy is on shorter rest. Cincy did play great against Purdue but I expect them to come back down to normalcy. I dont see them keeping the score within 7 after the first qtr and see a rout coming on. Lets go Cougars and set the tone for week 3! Good luck
 

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
47,388
Tokens
Fred, just an FYI......the Houston / Oklahoma game was played @ NRG Stadium in Houston.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
My bad on the place for the Oklahoma game. Oklahoma fans were there in large numbers, but it was a neutral site.

As for the Thursday home underdog ATS, there is no apparent reason why they are 16-8 the past few years. These kinds of trends tend to even out unless there is a sensible explanation on why they occur. Maybe the national exposure for the home underdog could account for some of it, but this line opened at -6 and sharp money hit it to -7.5 quickly.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
5* Nebraska -3

This line is already at 3.5(+105) at Pinnacle and -3(-115) at 5 Dimes. I think it'll move solidly to 3.5 by the end of the week. There's some disappointment ahead here in the Pacific Northwest. The Ducks and Seahawks look less formidable, maybe a lot. Oregon just doesn't look the same. I can't blame Mark Helfrich for it, OC Scott Frost is missed, and too many Duck fans have an ongoing lament that nobody will ever measure up to Chip Kelly. Considering how Oregon can't recruit with the big boys, although recruiting is much improved from 10 years ago, their fans are unrealistic about them being national contenders every year. This team looks like its in one of those down cycles in which they can still go 8-4, but I see a lot less 30 point blowouts, and many hard fought wins and losses.

The Ducks have truly not been tested by UC Davis or Virginia, and that's been in friendly Autzen Stadium. These are teams, that in the past, would be dispatched in the 1H and then we could watch the backups maintain for much of the 2nd half. UC Davis is a bottom tier Big Sky team, and yet moved the ball pretty well vs. Oregon's defense. Virginia is rebuilding with their new coach, and their offense couldn't do squat vs. Richmond(an FCS team). Just watching them, I can tell they are going to get beat up in their ACC games. 38 rushing yards in 21 carries, and getting out gained by Richmond by about 200 yards. They stink. And yet they moved the ball well almost all game, shooting themselves in the foot with turnovers and penalties. The Ducks offense has put up the yards vs. these two opponents, but believe me, neither had a defense that can come close to matching the speed of the Oregon skill players. UC Davis gave up 653 yards to Southern Oregon- a NAIA team. (more on this write-up later)
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
5* Nebraska -3

This line is already at 3.5(+105) at Pinnacle and -3(-115) at 5 Dimes. I think it'll move solidly to 3.5 by the end of the week. There's some disappointment ahead here in the Pacific Northwest. The Ducks and Seahawks look less formidable, maybe a lot. Oregon just doesn't look the same. I can't blame Mark Helfrich for it, OC Scott Frost is missed, and too many Duck fans have an ongoing lament that nobody will ever measure up to Chip Kelly. Considering how Oregon can't recruit with the big boys, although recruiting is much improved from 10 years ago, their fans are unrealistic about them being national contenders every year. This team looks like its in one of those down cycles in which they can still go 8-4, but I see a lot less 30 point blowouts, and many hard fought wins and losses.

The Ducks have truly not been tested by UC Davis or Virginia, and that's been in friendly Autzen Stadium. These are teams, that in the past, would be dispatched in the 1H and then we could watch the backups maintain for much of the 2nd half. UC Davis is a bottom tier Big Sky team, and yet moved the ball pretty well vs. Oregon's defense. Virginia is rebuilding with their new coach, and their offense couldn't do squat vs. Richmond(an FCS team). Just watching them, I can tell they are going to get beat up in their ACC games. 38 rushing yards in 21 carries, and getting out gained by Richmond by about 200 yards. They stink. And yet they moved the ball well almost all game, shooting themselves in the foot with turnovers and penalties. The Ducks offense has put up the yards vs. these two opponents, but believe me, neither had a defense that can come close to matching the speed of the Oregon skill players. UC Davis gave up 653 yards to Southern Oregon- a NAIA team. (more on this write-up later)
Brady Hoke was supposed to turn around 2015's terrible defense, but it looks worse this year. They are getting absolutely gashed up the middle with a very young defense in the front 7 only returning one player(Virginia getting 15 plays of 8 yards or more). Their best defender so far has been true freshman Troy Dye. Last year it was the secondary that looked awful, so bad that wide receiver Charles Nelson was put in there and turned out to be one of the better players. This year looks no better. Virginia and UC Davis had many opportunities at open receivers, Duck DBs missed tackles and assignments, penalties….you name it… Hoke's job reminds me of Gary Anderson coming to OSU last year. Good coach, but he couldn't get blood out of a stone. The personnel just isn't there for Oregon like it wasn't there for Andersen last year. They're too inexperienced and lacking in playmakers, and no matter what Hoke tries, this is going to be a 2 year rebuilding project. Nebraska has an experienced QB in Tommy Armstrong who looks improved as a passer, and is always a running threat. It will be a monumental task for the Duck D stopping Nebraska at home.

It also used to be that the Ducks would just reload every year on the OL. Great players waiting in the wings and the offense clicks as usual. This year they have 3 redshirt freshmen starting and it is not clicking. Even though Oregon has all the weapons, the OL is allowing too much penetration, and the timing looks off. Too many penalties, too many times Dakota Prukop running around looking for a place to pass. Granted, he's good at scrambling, but Oregon is stalling on drives against poor teams, and might really underperform at a raucous Memorial Stadium. Prukop's running ability has not been a factor, gaining only 55 yards on 18 carries, the longest being 14 yards. Partly because he's no longer vs. FCS defenses, partly because of his OL.

As for Nebraska, despite Mike Riley's mediocre short tenure there, they seemed to have turned the corner at the end of last season- beating UCLA in their bowl and handily, beating unbeaten Michigan State and losing to Iowa by 8 while out gaining them by 180 yards. Most of that team returns, especially the better players. This Nebraska team has been looking at this game as redemption for last year's mediocre record, and it certainly could be Riley's redemption after getting whopped by Oregon year after year. Oregon will get their points, but not in the 30+ range. If Nebraska gets the crowd into it by playing well early, it could get ugly. The Cornhuskers have started their first 2 games poorly, and this week's emphasis is being prepared from minute one.

Both teams have some injuries. Oregon has a TE, and 2 defensive starters probably out, Nebraska has a questionable WR Alonzo Moore(who is a starter and very good).
 

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
1,813
Tokens
Ducks are a very young team defensively, not to mention, new DC in Hoke. Ducks defense will need to improve drastically if they want to improve their ranking. However, I don't see that happening anytime soon. Nebraska should win here by at least 6 points.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
Ducks are a very young team defensively, not to mention, new DC in Hoke. Ducks defense will need to improve drastically if they want to improve their ranking. However, I don't see that happening anytime soon. Nebraska should win here by at least 6 points.
Hoke might be doing all the right things, but from my eye test, this defense looks less polished and tackles more poorly in the front 7 than last year. You watch Virginia, they'll struggle to move the ball against almost everyone else….
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
Ward was not limited at all in practice this week. He might have played last week if the game was important, but it was Lamar. From what I've read, his shoulder is still sore, but he is throwing just fine. The outlier is that if he lands on that shoulder, he could have problems. I think Herman will dial back too many Ward runs, but often he takes off while ad-libbing(something makes him so damn good). The back backup, Postma, is no Ward but is a decent dual threat. Can break off big runs, but is just an average passer. Has played quite a bit the last 2 years. Cinn. gave up over 500 yards to Purdue last week, and the game would have been closer, or Purdue could have won, IF they didn't give up a 5-0 TO edge. I just think Houston has a large defensive edge here.

Oh..and ask any question you want as long as it's related. Please, no drama.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,931
Messages
13,575,386
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com