Wow, the Pac ain't messing around. Their new media rights agreement is very strict. This media power grab arms race by not only the Pac but other conferences is going to completely squeeze out these good non-conference games the fans like to see. Conan, whatcha think about this?
http://eye-on-collegefootball.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/24156338/34724850
Methinks someone got financially screwed over somewhere. Done out of their piece of the action.
That's what I think because of this clause in the announcement:
"unless such agreement provides the Conference with the exclusive broadcast rights and digital rights in all media, and copyright to such neutral-site game"
My guess is that Larry Scott got a taste of business "Texas-style" when Oregon played LSU last year at Jerry's World. The conference got the short end of the stick and he didn't appreciate it. Chances are if I'm right, there won't be many more Jerry's World type games down the road, especially after the OOC participants see their share of the booty. Texas? Well we know it's a "WHOLE OTHER COUNTRY" so don't let that fact escape your mind when you think it over.
I am all for the home/home series concept anyway. It makes for a nice instant rivalry situation. This is the type of drama the game needs. One shot deals are fine but there are apparently too many grabby greedy pigs out there to pay the conferences their due. I'd be curious to know what the arrangements are in these one-shot "neutral site" games. (Normally played in or near one of the school's conference's territory which "de-neutralizes" it to an extent too... don't forget.)
We don't play it Boise St's way out here. We are not so desperate for opponents or the limelight as some of these upstart colleges that have small fan bases. They can afford to give away what they don't have.