We HAD to invade Iraq.

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
The Hunt for Kurdish Oil <!-- end headline -->
kurdistan-250x200.jpg

<!--deck-->Washington Dispatch: Inside the Bush administration's Kurdish oil paradox. <!--end deck-->
<!--byline--><SCRIPT language=Javascript type=text/javascript> <!-- byline_title_by_url('/washington_dispatch/2008/07/'); //--> </SCRIPT>By Laura Rozen <!--end byline-->
<!--date-->July 31, 2008<!--end date-->
</NOINDEX>
<!--begin skip--><!--BILLBOARD table--><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=300 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=2><!-- TOOLS --><!--begin skip--><!--TOOLS table--><NOINDEX><!-- -->



<!--end TOOLS div--></NOINDEX><!--end TOOLS table--><!--end skip--><!-- END TOOLS --></TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2><NOINDEX><!--
Advertisement​
--><SCRIPT language=Javascript type=text/javascript><!--DisplayAds("Top3,Middle1,Right3!Middle1", "300", "250");//--></SCRIPT><SCRIPT language=JavaScript1.1 src="http://oascentral.motherjones.com/RealMedia/ads/adstream_jx.ads/motherjones.com/washington_dispatch/page.html/1781357724@Top3,Middle1,Right3!Middle1"><!-- --></SCRIPT><!-- -->
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2><SCRIPT type=text/javascript>adsonar_placementId=1363054;adsonar_pid=1069768;adsonar_ps=-1;adsonar_zw=300;adsonar_zh=250;adsonar_jv='ads.adsonar.com';</SCRIPT><SCRIPT language=JavaScript src="http://js.adsonar.com/js/adsonar.js"></SCRIPT>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!--end BILLBOARD table--><!--end skip-->

<!--begin story body-->One muggy evening this summer, Qubad Talabani, the 31-year-old son of the president of Iraq, was chatting over drinks at a Dupont Circle bar when his BlackBerry rang. "It's Ray Hunt," Talabani said, looking at the caller ID on his phone. The Washington representative of the Iraqi Kurdistan Regional Government apologized for the interruption, and turned away to take the call. His caller is a man who has no trouble getting his phone calls answered at any hour, anywhere in the world. A Bush/Cheney fundraising Pioneer, a member of Bush's President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, and the president of the Dallas-based Hunt Oil company, Ray Hunt is the kind of Texas oilman with easy insider access to the Bush White House. Perhaps not coincidentally, he also heads the first American oil firm to have received an oil exploration contract with the Iraqi Kurdistan Regional Government, announced last September. As such, he has come to epitomize one of the more glaring contradictions about the Bush administration's policy toward Iraq and its oil wealth. Namely: If the Bush administration, as it proclaims, supports passage of an Iraqi oil law that would share the country's wealth across ethnic and regional divides, why do Bush-linked companies keep getting Kurdish-area oil concessions that bypass the Iraqi national government?
Hunt Oil isn't the only one. This week, the Wall Street Journal reported that another Bush administration insider, Richard Perle, had approached Talabani seeking an Iraqi Kurdish oil concession on behalf of a consortium involving Turkish oil companies and the Kazakh government. "The K18 concession, which is estimated to hold 150 million or more barrels of oil, would potentially be operated by Houston-based Endeavour International," reported the Journal. The Hunt Oil and Perle-Turkish-Kazakh ventures are among more than twenty oil contracts signed (with dozens more under consideration) by the Kurdish Regional Government, in a process conducted largely in the dark. As troubling, several of the proposed Kurdish oil deals would financially benefit key Washington figures with close ties to the Bush administration.
"Iraq is predicted to pump 70 billion dollars worth of oil this year. That gives them a 50 billion dollar budget surplus," notes a congressional staffer knowledgeable about the situation. "The administration, Iraqi government, and everyone say that getting this national oil law is a prerequisite for political reconciliation and the US being able to get out sooner. To the extent that the situation is becoming chaotic, it is hurting the chances for that."
On July 2, Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform, wrote Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice a letter laying out documents that seemingly contradict Bush administration claims to have been kept mostly in the dark about the Hunt Oil deal with the Kurdish Regional Government.
Included are emails from US advisers on Iraqi reconstruction expressing gratitude that Hunt Oil officials were keeping them apprised of their efforts. As Waxman's letter to Rice notes:

A Commerce Department official who met with Hunt Oil officials in Kurdistan offered them further support and wished them "a fruitful visit to Kurdistan." Five days after the announcement of the Hunt Oil contract, a State Department official contacted Hunt Oil to describe another "good opportunity for Hunt" in Iraq, prompting a Hunt Oil official to write Ray Hunt: "This is really good for us...I find it a huge compliment that he is 'tipping' us off about this...This is a lucky break."​
Waxman's letter requested documents from the State Department to help clarify the seeming contradictions in the administration's position. His congressional oversight committee continues to investigate the Bush administration's policy on Iraq's oil deals.
"No one has come out and said there is any current law that specifically prohibits Kurdistan from doing its own oil deals," says the congressional staffer. "At the very best, [the situation] is very legally ambiguous."
In the waning days of the Bush administration and its influence over Iraq, it's an ambiguity that international oil tycoons, Kurdish dynasts, and administration insiders seem eager to exploit while they still can. By the time ambiguities in the current Iraqi law are clarified, such claims may be hard to reverse.
As Talabani told Hunt that muggy evening, it's hard to discuss further Kurdish oil concessions "while there is so much ambiguity" in the current situation. But, he added, "I'm sure there's a way we can find common ground."
<!--end story body-->
<!--begin author bio-->Laura Rozen is national security correspondent for Mother Jones. <!--end author bio-->

<!--newsletter plug-->
 

New member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
231
Tokens
So the US spent $600 billion invading Iraq to squeeze a couple billion of dollars in oil revenue?

Seems like a terrible investment. Or you're just wrong.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 5, 2007
Messages
257
Tokens
So the US spent $600 billion invading Iraq to squeeze a couple billion of dollars in oil revenue?

Seems like a terrible investment. Or you're just wrong.


I don't think that is the math that Bush and his buddies had in mind.

You see, they spend 600 Billion of our (tax payers) money so that they
can squeeze a couple of Billion in oil revenue.

Get It now.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,178
Tokens
We had to go in there an take care of business specifically, getting rid of the WMD and mission accomplished cause they be there no more!

Now we are only there to help the people get better and feel safer. This is what I think about this here issue.


:dancefool:dancefool:dancefool:dancefool:dancefool:dancefool:dancefool:toast:
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
So the US spent $600 billion invading Iraq to squeeze a couple billion of dollars in oil revenue?

Seems like a terrible investment. Or you're just wrong.


Just a drop in the bucket. Halliburton and the other KBR companies are getting fat. Its the neocons looting the treasury while hollering "watch out for the liberals" "the liberals are going to gitcha"
 

New member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
231
Tokens
I don't think that is the math that Bush and his buddies had in mind.

You see, they spend 600 Billion of our (tax payers) money so that they
can squeeze a couple of Billion in oil revenue.

Get It now.

No. That still doesn't make sense. Sorry, you're wrong.
 

"Things do not happen. Things are made to happen."
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
2,624
Tokens
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 5641282" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>punter</TD><TD class=alt2>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by Vision
So the US spent $600 billion invading Iraq to squeeze a couple billion of dollars in oil revenue?

Seems like a terrible investment. Or you're just wrong.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Just a drop in the bucket. Halliburton and the other KBR companies are getting fat. Its the neocons looting the treasury while hollering "watch out for the liberals" "the liberals are going to gitcha" </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

:nohead: Well said...
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
obviously they miscalulated and costing us alot more than they originally envisioned i agree with you on that level vision

but it goes beyond just the oil....the want to attempt to americanize the ME as well with iraq being that example/first step towards that

with iraqi kids wearing nike shoes, eating at mcdonalds, shopping at abercrombie and fitch in malls

yada yada

short term iraq a huge failure investment wise...we'll see how the investment pays off over the long haul
 

Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
5,905
Tokens
spoils may take decades not years

hard to argue for the war if you look at like a quick ROI
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
With a little arm twisting we will have a supply of oil waiting in Iraq. I’m not going as far as to say the current administration saw that the witch would try to make it difficult to use our own resources, I’ll just call it backup plan B. Looking out for Americans.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
So the US spent $600 billion invading Iraq to squeeze a couple billion of dollars in oil revenue?

Seems like a terrible investment. .

The various companies who have been the beneficiaries of that $600billion consider it a GREAT investment.
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
26,039
Tokens
Ummm...when the libs stop looking at the immediate easy answer and say we went for the oil....they may start to realize one thing...

We are there for real estate. Plain and simple. Now there is a blooming democracy, ally and potential power smack dab in the middle of the axis of evil..and only about 1500 miles from Israel.

Oil, oil, oil...wrong. This move was done for stability in the region and in the world.
 

Militant Birther
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
11,836
Tokens
Ummm...when the libs stop looking at the immediate easy answer and say we went for the oil....they may start to realize one thing...

We are there for real estate. Plain and simple. Now there is a blooming democracy, ally and potential power smack dab in the middle of the axis of evil..and only about 1500 miles from Israel.

Oil, oil, oil...wrong. This move was done for stability in the region and in the world.

Sharp post -- but well beyond the understanding of the lunatic fringes on the loony left.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
Interesting take on things.

South East Asia seemed to stabilize when we left.
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
Interesting take on things.

South East Asia seemed to stabilize when we left.

its all about the :money8:

and that doesn't mean just oil alone

and those that chose to make the move and had to throw alot of propaganda around to get it done....thought things would go alot more smoothly than they have to date
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
26,039
Tokens
Interesting take on things.

South East Asia seemed to stabilize when we left.

Interesting indeed...because Vietnam, Korea and company are so much more stable than they were before we left.

Nothing to do with the propaganda machine the left call fair and balanced reporting.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
We must have control of the geographer's also. To have you think that Korea is is South East Asia.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Interesting indeed...because Vietnam.... so much more stable than they were before we left.

Are you suggesting that Vietnam was a better place to live, operate a business and raise a family in 1972 than it is today??
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
We must have control of the geographer's also. To have you think that Korea is is South East Asia.

PUNTER, the evil liberal commie Pelosi-Reid Congress has tilted public education towards teaching little but condoms, gayness and sensitivity.

No time left for geography.

All you need to know is the ol' Axis of Evil and also know that the US military is on a steady killing rampage there to keep your next shopping mall experience safe from a seven year old suicide nuclear bomber.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
Yep! Just to think that all these idiots were semi-normal before Pelosi got in there.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,814
Messages
13,573,565
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com