We are breeding generations of hell bent terrorists? Post proof here idjit Darryl

[Sodium Pentethol V]

It is far too easy to show your idiotic conclusions have zero basis in fact.


Remember Darryl, a few centuries, plenty of conflicts and yet your fear m o n gering sorry ass, cannot cite just one single incident where a USA conflict has led to generations of hell bent terrorists attacking americans or amiracn owned interests.

Who cares though right? It sounds good, who gives a shit if it is blatantly false.

[This message was edited by bucsfan67 on March 29, 2004 at 12:40 PM.]

 

[eltonio]

do amiracns own anything?

 

[TheGeneral+]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by eltonio:
do amiracns own anything?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Do we have to include the National deficit?

 

[EverFresh]

I think the main question here is:

are amiracns idjits?

 

[DarrylParsons]

So far you guys have protected yourselves from conventional warfare by spending as much as all other countries combined on national defense. Now there is another type of warfare emerging in which defense capabilities are measured in intellectual and not monetary terms. We are in a new age so it's no wonder there is no precedent just yet.

Intelligent and creative people have the ability to foresee events that have no direct precedent. Idjits on the other hand are more limited so I can see why you require a few lines on the past performances sheet before placing your bets.

 

[Sodium Pentethol V]

You are now equating intelligence and creativity to blatant fear m o n g ering?

Great dude, I can make up shit and scare the crap outta people too?

Hasn't happened yet nor will, see when you are the oppressed it is very easy to identify your liberators,

when you aren't and confuse liberation with imperialism and colonialism you end up with idiotic deductions that have zero basis in fact and or circumstance.

I love you guys, that poker challenge is an open invite, nothing better than beating the shit out of people that have inflated views of their own skills.

 

[jimbutorac]

SP,

You accuse everyone else of being fearful yet in post after post you make vague allusions of dire consequences if we didn't take Saddam out.

Since he didn't have any WMD (and no ties to Al Qeada), since he couldn't even muster an air force for lack ofr parts due to sanctions, maybe you can tell me what you and Bushies were afraid of?

 

[Sodium Pentethol V]

I am very afraid of a guy with resources who would choose a hole in the ground over one of his upteen opulent mansions.

Afterall all the guy had to do was comply with the UN resolutions and he would still have his little kingdom.

 

[xpanda]

That, and a handful of targets on his back, once it had been concluded that he was basically defenseless against his many enemies in the region. You seem to think that the US is the only nation that hated Saddam.

 

[Sodium Pentethol V]

I think for your sake it would be better if you focused on one topic at a time.

I will play along, who would've invaded?

Iran?

What would be the UN's response?

What would've happened if he complied with the resolutions?

I'll help, there is a reasonable chance that the guy would've remained in power till death and passed on the murderous reins to his two charming sons.

Of course at some point in the future the son's ambitions and the UN resolutions would clash and we would be in the same position,

except it would cost more, more people would likely die,

and I assume the sons would be significantly harder to track down, as I suspect they were not as demented as their father, as evil, but not as as far from reality.

 

[DarrylParsons]

Sodium,

OK I'll take you up on your poker challenge...I've got some $$$ on my account at UltimateBet

$50-$100 Holdem? (heads-up of course) Say until one of us wins $10,000 from the other or for 10 playing hours (not necessarily at one sitting), whichever comes first?

What do you say?

 

[Sodium Pentethol V]

How about a game that requires skill?
Like pot limit omaha hilo?

And how about at a place that charges a reasonable fee to play?

And how abt 10K one sitting no one leaves till thegame is done,

I will be available the weekend following this one.

BTw if you are ever in the AC area I will gladly play you and refund 5% of your losses any limit any game you like.

What do you say?

 

[DarrylParsons]

I don't have much experience at PLO-HL so 10K would be too much, but PokerStars has heads-up tourney tables for $200+$10 per game. I'd go along with playing a series of those let's say until the first one wins 10 games?

The 1st weekend of April is fine by me.

 

[Sodium Pentethol V]

I would rather play a series of heads up games for $200 than the tournies with the escalating blinds, too many end up as coin flips.

I will look around for the most economical means to accomplish this,

unfortunately online has not been conducive to heads up play, I watched two guys play at WH the other day and pay like $700 in rake for 5 hrs of play. Heads up Hi Lo leads to alot of split pots with the house being the only winner. However it is a far greater game of skill than limit or no limit hold em.

 

[Oceans11]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by EverFresh:
I think the main question here is:

are amiracns idjits?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

ooh.sharp.

 

[DarrylParsons]

I think all poker games are 100% skill games if played long enough. The difference is in how long you have to play before the luck part becomes negligible.

If the poker is too complicated to set up because of the rake etc. how about a side bet with no juice on the v-wager baseball contest which starts in a week? We each send, say, $2500 by Neteller to one of the mods like the General for example and whoever does better on the contest after 20 weeks takes the $5000.

What do you say?

 

[Sodium Pentethol V]

How abt 100 horses,
for 10K?

Better yet DP how about some real action,` you know in the men's world,

how about some 100K contest heads up in the market?

Why live in the nickle rocket four flusher world of gambling?

afterall you think you are so much smarter than the rest of mankind.

 

[Sodium Pentethol V]

BTW I am online playing just abt anytime I am posting, so if you would care to just come and join the game, you lemme know.

Tonights an exception as I am planning on watching the BBall games, but almost any other time you see a post of mine, I am playing, so you want to join in you just follow that post and I will let you know where I am.

 

[DarrylParsons]

Sodium,

I'm not interested in your big talk. You made an offer, I accepted, so let's just do it, ok? Are you saying that a rake of $10 per $200 tournament is not possible to overcome if your opponent is an idjit? He's even so much of an idjit that he's willing to pay the same rake AND play in YOUR choice of game, despite having close to zero experience in it. Surely you wouldn't want to pass up such an opportunity!? Everyone knows that the rake can be overcome against an idjit.

 

[Sodium Pentethol V]

I am obviously paralyzed with fear why else would I possibly turn down an opportunity like this?

Remember anytime I am posting I am playing, you want to join in just give the word,

and BTW your inane math proclamations about skill,

if the expectation is half of one percent, how many lifetimes till there is a 99% chance of being ahead?

If you can't live that long who give's a shit?

Same stupid shit applies to heads up poker, the proper play is to raise almost every hand from position, which leads to four bets to go pre flop almost every hand, which leads to basically bingo.

If you watched any of the your propositions in action you would see that, duh.