Zit, kinda like a simpleton juvenile sign, you'd think they'd be more sophisticated, but here's my question
did she scratch her nose any other time? If every-time she scratched her nose Holt interrupted or mistakenly fact checked Trump, then it becomes a more credible story to me.
I just loved the last question, in retrospect it does make it look like Holt was more than just incredibly biased, he was a team player.
A) Behind the scenes, Team Clinton's working with Glamour Magazine to publish a story about a Latino beauty queen from 1996. Article being released day after debate.
B) Lester Holt's final question is "Donald, what did you mean when you said Hillary doesn't look presidential", strongly implying sexism (as juvenile as the topic is, he still went there)
C) Hillary goes on rehearsed rapid fire accusations about sexism, then mentions the Latino beauty queen, then campaigns with her prop the next day
That my friends, is coordinated scumbag bullshit. And that's what Americans hate about modern day politicians in general and Hillary in particular.
BTW, FWIW, I didn't see the camera on Hillary scratching her nose all day, butt I did see it showing Donald drinking water all the time. Again, by design? I'm leaning yes, I don't trust anything about the process anymore.