I watched the whole thing and will have to go back through it and tell you which parts I dispute and why. The guy had some good points and he didn't group all liberals together. This is why I would have to go through the 45 min video and take it one at a time and distinguish between big L and little l. I mean he was speaking at The Heritage Foundation so of course he was asked no tough questions. He should have done it on Fox and then he would of actually had cheerleaders ...lol...Give me some time I wil post disputes.
I didn't think the movie Crash said "America is an evil horrible nation where every moment of everyday is filled with bigotry and racism". Funny how he looked at the scenes in a negative light. I thought the movie explained how people who are bigots can cut through it and do the right thing when it is most important. Like when Matt Dillon risks his life to save a woman that could ruin his career. There are other examples as well if needed I will rent Crash again and post my thoughts if wanted.
It's funny it really is how you look at it.....you know your own perspective....I had an argument one night about the second amendmant with 2 guys I consider pretty smart and this line was the basis of their argume......
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Funny thing was it was used as the base of my argument that it is clearly stated we have the right to bear arms.
Who says to remove bigotry you have to remove rational thought? A quote from someone to back up this statement would be nice.
SO his premiss that the UN is wrong and doesn't work and has problems is fine with me. My question is are we able to change and improve it? We believe we can change the ME by occupying and establishing a democracy. Can we not change the UN? I don't think all Liberals believe the UN is this great wonderful thing. It does give us a ground point to work from. How can you say we needed to invade Iraq because they violated UN sanctions while you show no respect of anything the UN does?
His reference to Robert Lederman, even though he doesn't say his name, seems very misleading here is Lederman's response http://www.openair.org/alerts/artist/nyhitl2.html
This would be easier if someone had a transcript. Let me know if anyone has one so I can cut and paste if not I will try to post more later.
It's funny it really is how you look at it.....you know your own perspective....I had an argument one night about the second amendmant with 2 guys I consider pretty smart and this line was the basis of their argume......
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Funny thing was it was used as the base of my argument that it is clearly stated we have the right to bear arms.
Who says to remove bigotry you have to remove rational thought? A quote from someone to back up this statement would be nice.
SO his premiss that the UN is wrong and doesn't work and has problems is fine with me. My question is are we able to change and improve it? We believe we can change the ME by occupying and establishing a democracy. Can we not change the UN? I don't think all Liberals believe the UN is this great wonderful thing. It does give us a ground point to work from. How can you say we needed to invade Iraq because they violated UN sanctions while you show no respect of anything the UN does?
His reference to Robert Lederman, even though he doesn't say his name, seems very misleading here is Lederman's response http://www.openair.org/alerts/artist/nyhitl2.html
This would be easier if someone had a transcript. Let me know if anyone has one so I can cut and paste if not I will try to post more later.
Only from the brain of a liberal could we get such obfuscated thinking.
How about this guy being a Jewish AMERICAN.
How about this guy being a Jewish CONSERVATIVE.
Only a bigot could see that this guy is a jew and think nothing else about him beyond his "jewishness"- it's the same mind set toward blacks; a liberal would see a black conservative and spew the same tripe, never recognizing that their liberalism is racist and the cause of any percieved racial problems.
I think what he is saying about the movies is that the awards shows don't give awards to the best movies they are given to the movie that try and tell us how to think and what to believe. Look at inconvenient truth, there are just as many scientists that say we can not prove that humans are causing global warming , yet it won best documentary. I think he was ripping on Hollywood as a whole.
Regarding the Fox News comment a couple of posts up... It's funny how it ok for ABC, NBC, CBS, etc to give Democrats a free pass by not asking them tough questions but Fox News is criticized daily for being right wing yet they have way more left wingers on their network than any of the mainstream media combined.
Regarding the Fox News comment a couple of posts up... It's funny how it ok for ABC, NBC, CBS, etc to give Democrats a free pass by not asking them tough questions but Fox News is criticized daily for being right wing yet they have way more left wingers on their network than any of the mainstream media combined.
It's much the same as thhe said. All nonconformists know is the thing that they were educated in fifth grade... try not to hit, the UN is extraordinary, and so forth... For reasons unknown they overlook the certainties. They guarantee to be for the right to speak freely, as long is it's liberal the right to speak freely. LOL
ONE THING IS Without a doubt JOE.... You won't get one liberal on this string will question anything this person says....well you presumably will however they won't have any realities to back them up....Surprise Shock.
ONE THING IS Without a doubt JOE.... You won't get one liberal on this string will question anything this person says....well you presumably will however they won't have any realities to back them up....Surprise Shock.
