Vance vs. Walz: A Royal Ass-Kicking That Was 🥊

StevieRay · Oct 2, 2024

he moderators were obnoxious,” said Brit Hume of Fox News in his opening reaction to Tuesday’s debate.

And Hume was right.

For some reason, Democrat propaganda news organs are allowed to control the presidential debates, and every time they get an opportunity to present one of these affairs they never cease to disappoint.

Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan were the moderators of Tuesday’s vice-presidential debate, and the terms agreed to were that they wouldn’t fact-check the candidates as ABC’s propagandists David Muir and Linzey Davis did to Donald Trump in the previous debate.

They violated those terms, of course, but that backfired. Badly.

They didn’t try to fact-check Vance again, though there were a few snide editorial comments and a host of attempted “gotcha” questions Vance casually batted away with aplomb.

This, in a nutshell, is why it was a great choice for Trump to nominate J.D. Vance as his running mate. In fact, it’s an exposition of a massive difference in leadership between Trump and Kamala Harris – or Joe Biden, for that matter.

StevieRay · Oct 2, 2024

StevieRay · Oct 2, 2024

roadreeler57 · Oct 2, 2024

StevieRay · Oct 2, 2024

StevieRay said:
he moderators were obnoxious,” said Brit Hume of Fox News in his opening reaction to Tuesday’s debate.

And Hume was right.

For some reason, Democrat propaganda news organs are allowed to control the presidential debates, and every time they get an opportunity to present one of these affairs they never cease to disappoint.

Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan were the moderators of Tuesday’s vice-presidential debate, and the terms agreed to were that they wouldn’t fact-check the candidates as ABC’s propagandists David Muir and Linzey Davis did to Donald Trump in the previous debate.

They violated those terms, of course, but that backfired. Badly.

They didn’t try to fact-check Vance again, though there were a few snide editorial comments and a host of attempted “gotcha” questions Vance casually batted away with aplomb.

This, in a nutshell, is why it was a great choice for Trump to nominate J.D. Vance as his running mate. In fact, it’s an exposition of a massive difference in leadership between Trump and Kamala Harris – or Joe Biden, for that matter.

Vance is an example of his experience in 2024.

Trump has a running mate who, thanks to the benefit of his own experience, is on board with his agenda in a way Pence never was.

And what you saw from Vance was that Trump was not afraid to pick someone even more polished, even more composed, and even more in command of facts and details than he is. That’s not what you saw with Kamala Harris, who refused Josh Shapiro as her VP choice out of insecurity over his talent relative to hers.

Vance is far and away the best communicator – in the old political sense – of the four presidential and vice-presidential nominees of both parties. And he showed it Tuesday night.

He made zero mistakes. He was never stumped. He didn’t stumble. He never lost his cool. He saw all the questions coming and had devastating answers ready.

roadreeler57 · Oct 2, 2024

StevieRay · Oct 2, 2024

StevieRay said:
Vance is an example of his experience in 2024.

Trump has a running mate who, thanks to the benefit of his own experience, is on board with his agenda in a way Pence never was.

And what you saw from Vance was that Trump was not afraid to pick someone even more polished, even more composed, and even more in command of facts and details than he is. That’s not what you saw with Kamala Harris, who refused Josh Shapiro as her VP choice out of insecurity over his talent relative to hers.

Vance is far and away the best communicator – in the old political sense – of the four presidential and vice-presidential nominees of both parties. And he showed it Tuesday night.

He made zero mistakes. He was never stumped. He didn’t stumble. He never lost his cool. He saw all the questions coming and had devastating answers ready.

Vance was an island of sanity in a sea of absurdity.

Vance was asked to defend the simple, obvious notion that deluging America with 15 million illegal aliens will necessarily pump up the demand for a basic necessity like housing, something which would have irritated most politicians, much less ordinary people. He offered up a Federal Reserve study proving it, which showed great preparation, but the question itself indicated how dumbed-down and ridiculous the intersection of politics and media have become.

Tim Walz whined about illegals, a not-small number of whom (over 600,000) are criminals and a shocking number of whom (13,000) are murderers, not to mention the unknown number who might have walked across our southern border with a backpack full of deadly Chinese fentanyl meant to poison Americans slung on their backs, being “demonized.”