Putting aside the fact that Gray's family was awarded over 6 million, looks like the force isn't as squeaky clean as some people believe:
Justice Department to Release Blistering Report of Racial Bias by Baltimore Police
By
RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr.,
SHERYL GAY STOLBERG and
MATT APUZZO<time class="dateline" datetime="2016-08-10T18:35:59-04:00" itemprop="dateModified" content="2016-08-10T18:35:59-04:00">AUG. 9, 2016</time>
Continue reading the main story Share This Page
<figure id="media-100000004579734" class="media photo lede layout-large-horizontal" data-media-action="modal" itemprop="associatedMedia" itemscope="" itemid="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/08/10/us/10baltimore-jp1/10baltimore-jp1-master768.jpg" itemtype="http://schema.org/ImageObject" role="group">
<figcaption class="caption" itemprop="caption description"> An officer in Baltimore taking part in an investigation of a police shooting of a 13-year-old boy who had a fake gun on April 27. Credit Gabriella Demczuk for The New York Times </figcaption> </figure> The Justice Department has found that the Baltimore Police Department for years has hounded black residents who make up most of the city’s population, systematically stopping, searching and arresting them, often with little provocation or rationale.
In a blistering report, coming more than a year after Baltimore erupted into riots over the police-involved death of a 25-year-old black man, Freddie Gray, the Justice Department is sharply critical of policies that encouraged police officers to charge black residents with minor crimes. A copy of the report was obtained by The New York Times.
The critique is the latest example of the Obama administration’s aggressive push for police reforms in cities where young African-American men have died at the hands of law enforcement.
The findings, to be released Wednesday, are the first formal step toward the Justice Department’s reaching a settlement with Baltimore — known as a “consent decree” — in which police practices would be overhauled under the oversight of a federal judge. The department started the inquiry at the invitation of Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake.
To show how officers disproportionately stopped black pedestrians, the report cited the example of a black man in his mid-50s who was stopped 30 times in less than four years. None of the stops led to a citation or criminal charge. Black residents, the report said, accounted for 95 percent of the 410 individuals stopped at least 10 times in the five and a half years of data reviewed.
<figure id="media-100000004579403" class="media photo embedded layout-large-horizontal media-100000004579403 ratio-tall" data-media-action="modal" itemprop="associatedMedia" itemscope="" itemid="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/08/10/us/10baltimore/10baltimore-master675.jpg" itemtype="http://schema.org/ImageObject" role="group"> Photo
<figcaption class="caption" itemprop="caption description"> Baltimore police officers near a mural of Freddie Gray last month. Credit Steve Ruark/Associated Press </figcaption> </figure> The most pronounced racial disparities were in arrests for the most discretionary offenses: For example, 91 percent of those arrested solely for “failure to obey” or “trespassing” were African-American, even though the city is 63 percent black, the report found.
In one telling anecdote from the report, a shift commander provided officers with boilerplate language on how to write up trespassing arrest reports of people found near housing projects. The template contained an automatic description of the arrestee: “A BLACK MALE.”
“The supervisor’s template thus presumes that individuals arrested for trespassing will be African-American,” the report stated, describing the sort of detentions the language was intended to facilitate as “facially unconstitutional.”
The report indicated that the frequency of arrests without probable cause was reflected in the fact that booking supervisors and prosecutors had declined to file charges, after arrests by their own officers, more than 11,000 times since 2010.
Two weeks ago, Maryland prosecutors dropped charges against the last of six officers charged in the April 2015 death of Mr. Gray, who sustained a fatal spinal cord injury while in custody. With that, Baltimore joined a growing list of cities where police-involved deaths sparked outrage, and even riots, yet no one was held accountable in court.
While no consent decree has been reached, the report states that the city and the Justice Department have agreed in principle to identify “categories of reforms the parties agree must be taken to remedy the violations of the Constitution and federal law described in this report.”
<figure id="justice-department-findings" class="interactive interactive-embedded limit-small layout-small bullet-list"> <figcaption class="interactive-caption">
Findings of the Justice Department Report
In its report, the Justice Department concluded that the Baltimore Police Department “engaged in a pattern or practice of conduct” that was unconstitutional or violated federal law, including:
</figcaption>
- Making unconstitutional stops, searches, and arrests.
- Using enforcement strategies of stops, searches and arrests that unfairly target African-Americans.
- Using excessive force.
- Retaliating against people engaging in constitutionally-protected expression.
</figure> “I don’t think at this point, it’s about justice for Freddie Gray anymore,” said Ray Kelly, a director of the No Boundaries Coalition, a West Baltimore group that provided its own report on police abuses to the Justice Department. “Now it’s about justice for our community, for our people.”
City Councilman
Brandon Scott, vice chairman of the council committee that oversees the department, said the next fight could be over how to pay for the police overhaul.
Baltimore is among nearly two dozen cities that the Obama administration has investigated after they were accused of widespread unconstitutional policing. Using its broad latitude to enforce civil rights laws, the Justice Department has demanded wholesale change in how cities conduct policing. In several cities, including Seattle; Cleveland; and Ferguson, Mo., those investigations began in the aftermath of a high-profile death that sparked protests and in some cases riots.
Police chiefs, prosecutors and experts say the investigations have forced cities to address longstanding, entrenched issues far beyond the targeted cities.
“Chiefs are constantly looking at these reports, not just to learn lessons and best practices from each other, but also what pitfalls we can avoid,” said Scott Thomson, the police chief in Camden, N.J., who is also the president of the Police Executive Research Forum.
But court-ordered reform can take years, which does little to ease the frustration of activists who say that police officers too often go unpunished for deadly encounters with unarmed people.
<figure id="document-Baltimore-P-D-Findings-Report-FINAL" class="interactive promo layout-large">
<figcaption class="interactive-caption"> Document
The Justice Department’s Report
A Justice Department investigation into the practices of the Baltimore police department found "reasonable cause to believe that the BPD engages in a pattern or practice of conduct that violates the Constitution or federal law."
</figcaption>
OPEN Document
</figure> Dayvon Love, 29, a founder of the Baltimore advocacy group Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle, said that changes would come only when civilians have a say in whether officers should face punishment. Mr. Love described frustrating meetings with Justice Department officials — including Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch.
“I was very skeptical and not really that enthused about meeting with them,” Mr. Love said. At one point, he said, he asked Ms. Lynch what she could do to change state law and give civilians more power over the police. “She said what I figured she’d say, which is that from her position as attorney general, she can’t really do anything about it.”
The Supreme Court has given police officers wide latitude in how they can use deadly force, which makes prosecuting them difficult, even in the killing of unarmed people. For the Justice Department to charge an officer with a federal crime, the bar is even higher. Prosecutors must show that the officer willfully violated someone’s civil rights.
State and federal investigators cleared the officer who killed
Michael Brown in Ferguson and those who killed 12-year-old
Tamir Rice in Cleveland. Federal prosecutors are still debating whether to bring charges in the death of
Eric Garner on Staten Island. Local prosecutors did not.
In Baltimore, black residents have been complaining for years of systematic abuse by the department. When the city’s top prosecutor, Marilyn Mosby, failed to get any convictions in Mr. Gray’s death, many in the city’s poorest African-American neighborhoods were not surprised.
After the 1991 beating of Rodney King in Los Angeles, Congress gave the Justice Department the power to investigate police departments for patterns of civil rights violations. The Obama administration has used that authority more aggressively than any other. Prosecutors are enforcing consent decrees on police departments in 14 cities.
“We tend to confront systemic problems only when forced to by seemingly extraordinary events,” Vanita Gupta, the Justice Department’s top civil rights prosecutor, said last year.
In Seattle, the investigation followed an officer’s shooting of a Native American woodcarver in 2010. The shooting was ruled unjustified, but prosecutors said they could not meet the legal standard to file charges. The federal authorities, however, found a pattern of excessive force and ordered the Police Department to provide better training and oversight. In recent years, the Justice Department has held Seattle up as an example of how cities can best respond to scathing investigations.
In other cities, the changes are just beginning. After months of arguing and delay, officials in Ferguson
accepted a settlement in March that will force the city to change its policies on when officers can use
stun guns, shoot at cars and stop pedestrians. Officials in Cleveland
agreed in May to follow strict new standards governing how and when its officers can use force.
The report is sure to fuel a broader debate on aggressive policing practices, as it blames much of Baltimore’s woes on so-called “zero-tolerance” policies adopted in the late 1990s. They were aimed at anyone on the streets whom officers viewed as suspect, making heavy use of
stop-and-frisk and other confrontation techniques.
But the approach, the report found, “led to repeated violations of the constitutional and statutory rights, further eroding the community’s trust in the police.”
While Baltimore officials have sought to curb the most extreme zero-tolerance policies, the legacy of the strategy continues to vex the department.
One example the report cited was a police sergeant who recently posted on Facebook that the “solution to the murder rate is easy: flex cuffs and a line at” the central booking office, made up of people arrested on charges of loitering.
Correction: August 11, 2016
An article on Wednesday about a Justice Department report on the Baltimore Police Department misstated, in some editions, part of the name of the organization led by Scott Thompson, who commented on the report. It is the Police Executive Research Forum (not Foundation). The article also misstated the surname of the president of the research forum in some editions. He is Scott Thomson, not Thompson.
