Originally I liked Utah at the +6' opener but didn't pull the trigger. As the line dropped I thought, "yup Utah was the right side and probably still is" ... but I'm trying to avoid going against the big10 this week (value? regression?) and there was something else I was uneasy about that I couldn't put my finger on until I read rolltides thread and I figured out what it was. One of his posted systems this week is "oppose well rested away team in gm 3 off blowout win and cover.
So oppose Utah and Cal, play Mich and Ari. This system isn't just random it shows potentially overvalued sides that are overvalued because of a bye, a blowout win and small sample size. I couldn't find a preseason line for this game but I gotta think it was at least 7, maybe even 8. Now its down to 3'.
Although I think Utah has the lines on both sides of the ball and the passing game to beat Mich, I can't help to think -3' is very good value on Mich. We play numbers not teams right? Utah is the right team but Mich seems like the correct #.
Please talk me out of this.
So oppose Utah and Cal, play Mich and Ari. This system isn't just random it shows potentially overvalued sides that are overvalued because of a bye, a blowout win and small sample size. I couldn't find a preseason line for this game but I gotta think it was at least 7, maybe even 8. Now its down to 3'.
Although I think Utah has the lines on both sides of the ball and the passing game to beat Mich, I can't help to think -3' is very good value on Mich. We play numbers not teams right? Utah is the right team but Mich seems like the correct #.
Please talk me out of this.