First of all, I'm here for your beautiful weather, laid back lifestyle and hot, easy women. Regarding the US, you have a very interesting view of how things work in the world. Sure, running a gambling site in Costa Rica does not appear to be illegal. However, once you start dealing with US players, it is clearly illegal in the US. Now your solution is simply not to travel to the US or try to change planes in the US if you are involved in an illegal US gaming site? That sort of retarded logic was popular 10 years ago, but clearly anybody with more than half a brain would conclude that if your business model revolves around breaking the law in the US, its an illegal business, regardless of where you are located.
No, not regardless of where you are located. Businesses are illegal based on each country and the treaties they have. Your lack of understanding of basic legal concepts is quite typical. However, it doesn't excuse the ignorance behind it.
Your falling for the logical fallacy of appeal to authority. It's flawed, you can go round and round in circles with it, but it doesn't stop being flawed.
Your example about Iran is stupid and irrelevant and shows how dumb you are, because not many countries in the world are compelled to care about those camel fuckers, but the US is a different ballgame.
Obviously it is a different ball game. I never argued that. Costa Rica's elite have a lot to gain by bending over backwards for the USA, not much for Iran.
But that doesn't make my example invalid. In fact, it illustrates the concept of jurisdiction, something you seem ignorant of. If you stopped and thought about it, maybe you'd understand.
BTW, nice try at an ad hominem. Real classy and the kind of thing one would expect from you. Fortunately for me, I can argue, and wipe the the floor with your ass in a debate any day of the week, without having to incur in desperate logical fallacies.
Almost every civilized country in the world (Costa Rica included) has agreements in place that force them to cooperate with the US government.
Yes, you are right. They are called extradition agreements. They work on the concept that if someone is breaking similar laws in a country a person can be extradited. Like if you sell cocaine in the US or any other fucking country CR has an extradition treaty and you come here, they will extradite you. Because what you are doing is illegal in both countries. That is what extradition treaties are all about. If you don't believe me, how about you look at this 'agreement' you are talking about. That way, you can see that you are talking out your a**
http://www.costaricalaw.com/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=72
In fact, CR is going to obey the US one, since it is for money laundering. I can't see how they'd do it on anything else. But that is still bullshit. Because money laundering by definition is hiding the sources of illegal proceeds, be it tax evasion, drug trafficking or anything else. The gambling they call illegal was not illegal, in fact, they know it, which is why their case revolves around money laundering and bank fraud. In fact, none of those companies normally uses CR to money launder, they just bring in money to pay employees.
No, the OIJ will not likely respond to any request from Iran, but obviously we see that they will when it comes to the US. Keep ignoring the obvious like these other assholes and maybe you will end up in an indictment one day.
Again
assuming. Din't you learn how you end up looking when you
assume? Most people learn this in high school.
Yes, they responded this time, but it isn't like they always respond. They do so when it is convenient for them. Not when jurisdiction demands. Like the rule of law would dictate. And that is what I'm criticizing (lack of respect for laws) and their anti-business mentality.
Why should Costa Rica act as some sort of haven to protect illegal gambling operators?
Fine, then change CR law to make US facing sportsbooks and casinos illegal. Again, we are going back to your lack of understanding of legal concepts.
Just so a few thousand people who get paid cash and don't pay any taxes, can continue to flourish? The industry fucked itself by sheer greed
I agree with that part.
and a sense of entitlement.
That is bullshit. People who earned money in gambling earned it. You wanna see entitlement? Go to to the gov. Business make money, they earn it. Whether you like it or not. Whether it rubs you the wrong way or not. It's called capitalism.
In fact, for someone so anti gambling, I'm not sure what you are doing on a gambling forum.
You wonder why the narcotics industry continues to flourish?
Hmmm, this has a painfully obvious answer: Because there is a ton of money in it. Why else?
It has nothing to do with the 'elite' in the country, like you think. The 'elite' print money doing menial things like importing cars or stereos, they don't need drug profits to become multi millionaires.
Oh yes, CR's elites make all their money from cars that get sold to $300/month indentured servants. They don't need drug or weapons money. Righhhhhhhtttt...
Oh no, I forgot, they say they make their money from tourism. Funny how demand for luxury goods kept up even with the downturn in tourism. You have to be really naive to believe that a large percentage of CR's economy doesn't depend on drugs (south to north) and guns (north to south).
Its all about connections to them.
This is true.
However, ask yourself the last time you were in a sports bar in Costa Rica where you heard cartel members boasting loudly about their illegal business, cheering for a shipment to reach its destination and buying shots of cheap tequila for all their employees to celebrate?
Actually, if you visit the strip clubs you will see the cartels having a blast. And everyone, from the strippers to the politicians, know what those guys are up to, but turn to look the other way. They make a ton of money of it, and since Washington's war on drugs is just a sham for the sheeple like you, there is not real power behind stopping it.
And I never argued that the gaming industry wasn't pulling the tigers tail. The DOJ has every right to freeze these people's assets that are on US soil, or in US companies (like US banks). They have a right to arrest people on US soil. That is part of the game. It is by the rules.
However, by freezing assets and doing the kinds of things they are doing to individuals in sovereign countries where those individuals aren't breaking local law, is against the rules of engagement that THEY MADE UP.
You see, the US makes the rules, and when someone beats them with their own rules, they just play like those rules never existed.
Why do you think antigua won in the WTO?
Oh, and I know the US doesn't play by the rules they create. I'm not indicted am I?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
But in any case, your going off in a tangent because I highlighted how you were being an a**.
I said this country is going to hell in a hand basked, and every possibly statistic (crime, divorce, corruption) supports this.
You are arguing otherwise. So if you have a point, and aren't just speaking out your ass, show me some proof, or go away with your tail between your legs. ~~:<<