Umpires

Search

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
69
Tokens
It may be a little early to start playing these but something to look at:

STL over 7 (Eric Cooper 6-1 to over)
Cubs (David Rackley 7-0 to home team)
LAD (Paul Schreiber 7-2 to road team)
OAK over 7.5 (Tom Woodring 3-0 to over)
BALT (Cory Blaser 7-1 to road team)
TOR over 9 ( Dan Iassogna 6-1 to over)
 

New member
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Messages
371
Tokens
love this info. had success in nba regular season with similar. how do you find out who's behind the plate?
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,655
Tokens
I love umpire angles, but these are very small sample sizes.

They are listed in the Service Plays Forum. They are very hit and miss because of the small sample size. I would proceed with caution using them.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,544
Tokens
It may be a little early to start playing these but something to look at:

STL over 7 (Eric Cooper 6-1 to over) Win with 11 runs
Cubs (David Rackley 7-0 to home team) Win 4-2 Cubbies
LAD (Paul Schreiber 7-2 to road team) Losing 5-3 in 7th.
OAK over 7.5 (Tom Woodring 3-0 to over) Win with 16 runs
BALT (Cory Blaser 7-1 to road team) Loss with KC winning 8-6
TOR over 9 ( Dan Iassogna 6-1 to over)Loss with 8 runs

Looks like a winning day or more likely a split. No matter what, good info. That is what the site is about. Thanks Jimmy.
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,655
Tokens
It was a split.

Small sample sizes are dangerous. Philly was 2-7 to the under against LH pitchers. Game went over today.

I can give you hundreds of small sample size situations. If you bet on small sample sizes over a period of time, you will more often than not lose.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,544
Tokens
Biz, it is what it is, and that is information being shared. Everyday there are way more dangerous and or irresponsible posts than sharing some early season umpire trends. In fact, daily I see trends over a decade that lose on any given day.

I think I get where you are coming from, but you are saying he should not post this info at all?
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,655
Tokens
Biz, it is what it is, and that is information being shared. Everyday there are way more dangerous and or irresponsible posts than sharing some early season umpire trends. In fact, daily I see trends over a decade that lose on any given day.

I think I get where you are coming from, but you are saying he should not post this info at all?

No, I'm not.

I'm saying you should take it with a grain of salt. Don't let it be the ONLY reason you make a play. Use it in addition to other factors.

I would not make a play based solely on this information, thats all.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,544
Tokens
No, I'm not.

I'm saying you should take it with a grain of salt. Don't let it be the ONLY reason you make a play. Use it in addition to other factors.

I would not make a play based solely on this information, thats all.

We agree 100%.
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,655
Tokens
I don't thing umpires make a difference whether or not a dog or favorite wins. There are far more reasons as to why a fav/dog wins besides an umpire. Its coincidental.

Now, totals are another thing. An umpire's distinct strike zone can absolutely affect the total, and I would monitor umpires over/under trends. I have several angles based specifically on umpires.

I'm not trying to shit all over the guy's thread. Just cautioning against using these early, small sample size trends blindly.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
69
Tokens
Biz, I agree. Still early. If you noticed the first sentence of my post, I stated that it may be early to play these. As it turned out Paul Nauert was HP umpire in NYY game 1. Umpires were not posted for those games before I had to leave yesterday. He was 6-1 to the over, so it ended up 2-2 on totals, and 1-2 for sides. I will continue to post when I am able. I do agree with BIZ regarding side plays. Will probably stick to totals only. If I remember right Paul Emmel had an unbelieveable record last year to the over.

Merkyone, I get my umpire information from Sports Options. The only problem is that the umpire assignments are hard to get for the first game of a series. They get posted maybe 30 minutes before gametime, unless someone knows where to get them quicker.
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,655
Tokens
I did notice your comment Jimmy, and my comments were in no way trying to blast you. More of a general comment.

If anyone wants umpire information, let me know. I can run it through a data base and give you the results.
 

New member
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
50
Tokens
Hey BIZ, you have any info for tonight's Brewers/Braves game? I really want to take the UNDER. Thanks
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,655
Tokens
Atlanta has many subsets to the under.

Home, RH pitching, Favored.

Milwaukee plays to the Under at home and Over on the road. Over at night and as a dog.

Peralta a pure Under pitcher this year. Minor pitched 2 good games and the 1 bad one vs Cards.

Atlanta has struggled offensively. Its either Under or nothing for me.

When I get the umpire assignments I'll post them.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,117
Tokens
wide strike zones can really benefit a superior battery

narrow strike zones can be a great equalizer, all pitchers are hit-able in the zone
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,810
Messages
13,573,507
Members
100,873
Latest member
nhacaixin88
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com