U.S. Sent Cash to Iran as Americans Were Freed.

Search

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
90,929
Tokens
WASHINGTON—The Obama administration secretly organized an airlift of $400 million worth of cash to Iran that coincided with the January release of four Americans detained in Tehran, according to U.S. and European officials and congressional staff briefed on the operation afterward.
Wooden pallets stacked with euros, Swiss francs and other currencies were flown into Iran on an unmarked cargo plane, according to these officials. The U.S. procured the money from the central banks of the Netherlands and Switzerland, they said.

The money represented the first installment of a $1.7 billion settlement the Obama administration reached with Iran to resolve a decades-old dispute over a failed arms deal signed just before the 1979 fall of Iran’s last monarch, <!-- --> Shah Mohammad Reza<!-- --> Pahlavi.
The settlement, which resolved claims before an international tribunal in The Hague, also coincided with the formal implementation that same weekend of the landmark nuclear agreement reached between Tehran, the U.S. and other global powers the summer before.

“With the nuclear deal done, prisoners released, the time was right to resolve this dispute as well,” President <!-- --> Barack Obama<!-- --> said at the White House on Jan. 17—without disclosing the $400 million cash payment.
<iframe name="google_ads_iframe_/2/interactive.wsj.com/worldnews_story_4" width="1" height="1" title="3rd party ad content" id="google_ads_iframe_/2/interactive.wsj.com/worldnews_story_4" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" style="border: 0px; border-image: none; vertical-align: bottom; width: 1px !important; height: 1px !important;"></iframe>
<iframe name="google_ads_iframe_/2/interactive.wsj.com/worldnews_story_4__hidden__" width="0" height="0" title="" id="google_ads_iframe_/2/interactive.wsj.com/worldnews_story_4__hidden__" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" style="border: 0px; border-image: none; vertical-align: bottom; display: none; visibility: hidden;"></iframe>Senior U.S. officials denied any link between the payment and the prisoner exchange. They say the way the various strands came together simultaneously was coincidental, not the result of any quid pro quo.

“As we’ve made clear, the negotiations over the settlement of an outstanding claim…were completely separate from the discussions about returning our American citizens home,” State Department spokesman John Kirby said. “Not only were the two negotiations separate, they were conducted by different teams on each side, including, in the case of The Hague claims, by technical experts involved in these negotiations for many years.”
But U.S. officials also acknowledge that Iranian negotiators on the prisoner exchange said they wanted the cash to show they had gained something tangible.
Sen. <!-- --> Tom Cotton,<!-- --> a Republican from Arkansas and a fierce foe of the Iran nuclear deal, accused President Barack Obama of paying “a $1.7 billion ransom to the ayatollahs for U.S. hostages.”

“This break with longstanding U.S. policy put a price on the head of Americans, and has led Iran to continue its illegal seizures” of Americans, he said.
Since the cash shipment, the intelligence arm of the Revolutionary Guard has arrested two more Iranian-Americans. Tehran has also detained dual-nationals from France, Canada and the U.K. in recent months.
At the time of the prisoner release, Secretary of State <!-- --> John Kerry<!-- --> and the White House portrayed it as a diplomatic breakthrough. Mr. Kerry cited the importance of “the relationships forged and the diplomatic channels unlocked over the course of the nuclear talks.”
Meanwhile, U.S. officials have said they were certain Washington was going to lose the arbitration in The Hague, where Iran was seeking more than $10 billion, and described the settlement as a bargain for taxpayers.

Iranian press reports have quoted senior Iranian defense officials describing the cash as a ransom payment. The Iranian foreign ministry didn’t respond to a request for comment.
The $400 million was paid in foreign currency because any transaction with Iran in U.S. dollars is illegal under U.S. law. Sanctions also complicate Tehran’s access to global banks.
“Sometimes the Iranians want cash because it’s so hard for them to access things in the international financial system,” said a senior U.S. official briefed on the January cash delivery. “They know it can take months just to figure out how to wire money from one place to another.”

The Obama administration has refused to disclose how it paid any of the $1.7 billion, despite congressional queries, outside of saying that it wasn’t paid in dollars. Lawmakers have expressed concern that the cash would be used by Iran to fund regional allies, including the Assad regime in Syria and the Lebanese militia Hezbollah, which the U.S. designates as a terrorist organization.
The U.S. and United Nations believe Tehran is subsidizing the Assad regime’s war in Syria through cash and energy shipments. Iran has acknowledged providing both financial and military aid to Syrian President <!-- --> Bashar al-Assad<!-- --> and deploying Iranian soldiers there.

But <!-- --> John Brennan,<!-- --> director of the Central Intelligence Agency, said last week that there was evidence much of the money Iran has received from sanctions relief was being used for development projects. “The money, the revenue that’s flowing into Iran is being used to support its currency, to provide moneys to the departments and agencies, build up its infrastructure,” Mr. Brennan said at a conference in Aspen, Colo.
The U.S. and Iran entered into secret negotiations to secure the release of Americans imprisoned in Iran in November 2014, according to U.S. and European officials. Switzerland’s foreign minister, <!-- --> Didier Burkhalter,<!-- --> offered to host the discussions.

The Swiss have represented the U.S.’s diplomatic interests in Iran since Washington closed its embassy in Tehran following the 1979 hostage crisis.
Iranian security services arrested two Iranian-Americans during President Obama’s first term. In July 2014, the intelligence arm of Iran’s elite military unit, the Revolutionary Guard, detained the Washington Post’s Tehran bureau chief, <!-- --> Jason Rezaian,<!-- --> and charged him with espionage.
A fourth Iranian-American was arrested last year. A former Federal Bureau of Investigation agent, Robert Levinson, disappeared on the Iranian island of Kish in 2007. His whereabouts remain unknown.

The Swiss channel initially saw little activity, according to these officials. But momentum shifted after Tehran and world powers forged a final agreement in July 2015 to constrain Iran’s nuclear program in return for the lifting of most international sanctions. A surge of meetings then took place in the Swiss lakeside city of Geneva in November and December.
The U.S. delegation was led by a special State Department envoy, <!-- --> Brett McGurk,<!-- --> and included representatives from the Central Intelligence Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation, according to U.S. and European officials. The Iranian team was largely staffed by members of its domestic spy service, according to U.S. officials.

The discussions, held at the InterContinental Hotel, initially focused solely on a formula whereby Iran would swap the Americans detained in Tehran for Iranian nationals held in U.S. jails, U.S. officials said. But around Christmas, the discussions dovetailed with the arbitration in The Hague concerning the old arms deal.
The Iranians were demanding the return of $400 million the Shah’s regime deposited into a Pentagon trust fund in 1979 to purchase U.S. fighter jets, U.S. officials said. They also wanted billions of dollars as interest accrued since then.

President Obama approved the shipment of the $400 million. But accumulating so much cash presented a logistical and security challenge, said U.S. and European officials. One person briefed on the operation joked: “You can’t just withdraw that much money from ATMs.”
Mr. Kerry and the State and Treasury departments sought the cooperation of the Swiss and Dutch governments. Ultimately, the Obama administration transferred the equivalent of $400 million to their central banks. It was then converted into other currencies, stacked onto the wooden pallets and sent to Iran on board a cargo plane.

On the morning of Jan. 17, Iran released the four Americans: Three of them boarded a Swiss Air Force jet and flew off to Geneva, with the fourth returning to the U.S. on his own. In return, the U.S. freed seven Iranian citizens and dropped extradition requests for 14 others.
U.S. and European officials wouldn’t disclose exactly when the plane carrying the $400 million landed in Iran. But a report by an Iranian news site close to the Revolutionary Guard, the Tasnim agency, said the cash arrived in Tehran’s Mehrabad airport on the same day the Americans departed.
Revolutionary Guard commanders boasted at the time that the Americans had succumbed to Iranian pressure. “Taking this much money back was in return for the release of the American spies,” said Gen. <!-- --> Mohammad Reza Naghdi,<!-- --> commander of the Guard’s Basij militia, on state media.

Among the Americans currently being held are an energy executive named <!-- --> Siamak Namazi<!-- --> and his 80-year old father, Baqer, according to U.S. and Iranian officials. Iran’s judiciary spokesman last month confirmed Tehran had arrested the third American, believed to be a San Diego resident named Reza “Robin” Shahini.
Friends and family of the Namazis believe the Iranians are seeking to increase their leverage to force another prisoner exchange or cash payment in the final six months of the Obama administration. Mr. Kerry and other U.S. officials have been raising their case with Iranian diplomats, U.S. officials say.
Iranian officials have demanded in recent weeks the U.S. return $2 billion in Iranian funds that were frozen in New York in 2009. The Supreme Court recently ruled that the money should be given to victims of Iranian-sponsored terror attacks.

Members of Congress are seeking to pass legislation preventing the Obama administration from making any further cash payments to Iran. One of the bills requires for the White House to make public the details of its $1.7 billion transfer to Iran.
“President Obama’s…payment to Iran in January, which we now know will fund Iran’s military expansion, is an appalling example of executive branch governance,” said Sen. <!-- --> James Lankford<!-- --> (R., Okla.), who co-wrote the bill. “Subsidizing Iran’s military is perhaps the worst use of taxpayer dollars ever by an American president.”
 

RX Senior
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
3,511
Tokens
Reagan, Bush, not even Carter would of paid ransom to Iran.

Without a doubt, Obama is the worst is the president we've ever had on so many different levels.
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
90,929
Tokens
It`s Democratic related.....Of course nothing will come of it......In and out of the news.

Talking negative Trump is more important to the media.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,836
Tokens
:beavis1: huh huh being a weak pussy president is cool huh huh
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2016
Messages
4
Tokens

RX Senior
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
3,511
Tokens
Reagan DID pay a ransom to Iran you stupid fn idiot.

http://articles.latimes.com/1986-12-20/news/mn-4453_1_iranian-official

A top Iranian official said Friday that the United States paid ransom to Iran in an effort to free American hostages in Lebanon, and suggested that further payments could lead to the release of more captives.


That was an agreement brokered by Carter just before Regan took office. He had little choice but to go along with the deal. EVERFRESH!!!
 

RX Senior
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
3,511
Tokens
Actually I think you're right. Remember something about spare parts and cash.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
3,556
Tokens
What's the link to the article?


You can't keep shitting on the world and expect there not to be repercussions. Perhaps our current reality involves some of those paybacks? The US has been sticking more than it's nose in Iran for 60+ years (and the rest of the world for that matter). The CIA,with Eisenhower approval, has admitted to orchestrating the 1953 Iran Coup along with UK secret service, MI6. I don't agree with Iran or their culture, but that is their fight. I think we have a lot of amends to make. 1.7 billion is a drop in the bucket, if it's a step toward righting a wrong.
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
90,929
Tokens
Fox News is the only 1 on this story.

MSNBC and CNN will not dare talk about it.....What else is new.
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
Formatting​
<style>.click_blocker_glasspane {display: none;height: 50px;left: 0;position: absolute;top: 0;width: 320px;z-index: 1;}</style>
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
Formatting​
<style>.click_blocker_glasspane {display: none;height: 50px;left: 0;position: absolute;top: 0;width: 320px;z-index: 1;}</style>
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
The Drudge Report, Fox News, Donald Trump, and a host of other right-wing institutions are in a tizzy today over a report in the Wall Street Journalthat the United States government sent a secret plane stuffed with $400 million in Swiss francs and euros directly to Tehran back in January, at precisely the same time Iran agreed to release four American detainees. “Obama Paid $400M ‘Ransom’ to Iran,” is how the New York Post is playing the story. Trump himself is calling it a “scandal.” What people seem to be missing is the fact that, while the Journal is the first to report that the payment was made in cash, literally everything else about the story—the money, the prisoner release, the quid pro quo allegations—was reported back in January.
First, a little backstory to explain how we got to this point: Earlier this year, the United States entered into an agreement with the Iranian government aimed at freezing Iran’s nuclear weapons program. As part of a whole bunch of peripheral issues surrounding that deal, there was a matter of four American citizens that were being detained in Iran on rather dubious charges, as well as $1.7 billion that Iran was demanding from the U.S. in restitution for an arms deal that went south back in the 1970s.

Back then, the U.S. and the government of the Shah agreed on a $400 million deal for fighter jets. The Shah delivered the money, but then he was deposed in the Iranian Revolution of 1979, so the Americans never delivered the jets. The American government did, however, hang on to the cash.


Ever since, the Iranian government has been trying to re-claim the payment in international courts, along with $1.3 billion in interest that’s accumulated over that time. As one of those peripheral issues, the U.S. agreed to pay the money back. This was pretty well known among people paying close attention, because President Obama said as much when it was all announced back in January. The New York Times reported at the time:
Mr. Obama also announced the resolution of another argument between Tehran and Washington that dates to the Iranian revolution, this one over $400 million in payments for military equipment that the United States sold to the shah of Iran and never delivered when he was overthrown. The Iranians got their money back, with $1.3 billion in interest that had accumulated over 37 years.

On or about the same day that the initial payment of $400 million was made, the four Americans were released, with three on a Swiss Air Force plane headed to Geneva, and one headed back to the United States.


At the time, there was speculation from U.S. Speaker Paul Ryan and others that the payment amounted to a ransom for the four Americans. White House press secretary Josh Earnest attempted to deflect those charges in press conference on January 19, 2016:
Q: [O]n Sunday, we learned that the United States made a payment to the government of Iran of $1.7 billion. Was this tied to the deal that led to the freedom of the Americans that were being held in Iran?
MR. EARNEST: Jon, this is actually the result of a long-running claims process that had been at The Hague. In 1979, there was obviously an Iranian revolution that abruptly severed relations between our two countries. And prior to that revolution, the U.S. government had entered into an agreement with the then-Iranian government to transfer about $400 million in military equipment to the Iranian government. Once the revolution took place, obviously that equipment was not transferred, but we also didn’t return Iran’s money either.... And for more than 30 years now, the Iranians have been using this claims process at The Hague to try to recover that $400 million....
Q: Okay, but as I understand it, the Department of State announced this payment of $1.7 billion to the government of Iran just before the plane carrying the freed Americans landed in Geneva. You’re really telling me that this is an absolute coincidence that this payment just happened to coincide with the precise moment when the American prisoners were flying to freedom?
MR. EARNEST: Jon, I think we’ve made pretty clear that this is not a coincidence. The fact is, these kinds of diplomatic opportunities—
Q: ecause Paul Ryan has suggested this was a ransom payment. You saw his statement.
MR. EARNEST: He’s wrong about that.

Of course, it’s tough to take those denials without a large grain of salt. A deal was signed, a payment was made, four Americans were released, the U.S. released seven Iranians on its own—things like that happen coincidentally every day. But whether you believe it or not, the issue of whether the $400 million payment to the Iranians was ransom was very publicly discussed seven months ago.

You wouldn’t know that to read the Journal story, though, which opens with the news that the payment took the form of a cash airlift:
The Obama administration secretly organized an airlift of $400 million worth of cash to Iran that coincided with the January release of four Americans detained in Tehran, according to U.S. and European officials and congressional staff briefed on the operation afterward.


The story makes no reference, aside from single a link to the Journal’s prior coverage of the deal, to the fact that the payment was a matter of public record. The cash bit was indeed secret, but reasonable (and unreasonable!) readers are interpreting the story as a scoop about a previously unreported payoff.
[COLOR=rgba(170, 170, 170, 0.74902)]<small class="proxima" style="box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 0.88rem; line-height: inherit;">ADVERTISEMENT</small>[/COLOR]
<iframe id="google_ads_iframe_/4246/gm.jalopnik/permalink_4" title="3rd party ad content" name="google_ads_iframe_/4246/gm.jalopnik/permalink_4" width="320" height="50" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0" style="box-sizing: inherit; border-width: 0px; display: block; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; max-width: 100%; vertical-align: bottom;"></iframe>



Politico, for example, covered Trump’s attack over the deal by saying “the previously unreported $400 million sent in January was the first installment of the White House’s $1.7 billion settlement with Iran.” Foreign Policy wrote that “Republican lawmakers are fuming Wednesday over a report that the U.S. government secretly sent the equivalent of $400 million to Iran last January.”
As for the quid pro quo allegations, the Journal story also brings nothing new to the table. It helpfully relays that, while the White House denied that the payment was related to the detainee release, the Iranian government boasted of precisely the opposite:
Revolutionary Guard commanders boasted at the time that the Americans had succumbed to Iranian pressure. “Taking this much money back was in return for the release of the American spies,” said Gen. Mohammad Reza Naghdi, commander of the Guard’s Basij militia, on state media.

But those claims were made at the time, in public, back in January.
The Journal’s overreach is unfortunate, because the details on how the cash made its way to Tehran are interesting, to say the least:
President Obama approved the shipment of the $400 million. But accumulating so much cash presented a logistical and security challenge, said U.S. and European officials. One person briefed on the operation joked: “You can’t just withdraw that much money from ATMs.”
Mr. Kerry and the State and Treasury departments sought the cooperation of the Swiss and Dutch governments. Ultimately, the Obama administration transferred the equivalent of $400 million to their central banks. It was then converted into other currencies, stacked onto the wooden pallets and sent to Iran on board a cargo plane.

The cash was made up of Swiss francs, euros, and other non-dollar currencies and was loaded aboard the unmarked cargo plane which landed in Iran. Because apparently electronic wire transfers aren’t good enough anymore, or something, and we want our diplomatic payments to be made in as untraceable manner as possible.
(As an aside, countries do maintaingold and foreign currency reserves as a matter of due course, so the fact that governments have any cash at all isn’t so strange.)
No, there’s no real way to prevent any government from spending money how it pleases. But when Iran is propping up Syria’s Bashar al-Assad regime and funding terrorists the world over, making a cash payment out of Swiss bank accounts probably wasn’t the best idea.
Nor is it a good idea to misleadingly frame a good little scoop about a cash delivery as a blockbuster revelation of a $400 million payment. Some readers aren’t smart enough to tell the difference.
<iframe id="twitter-760891856016314368" height="675" width="640" class="core-inset lazyloaded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" scrolling="no" webkitallowfullscreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" data-src="/ajax/inset/iframe?id=twitter-760891856016314368&autosize=1" style="box-sizing: inherit; border-width: 0px; display: block; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; max-width: 100%;"></iframe>
The Wall Street Journal did not respond to a request for comment.




http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/that-400-million-secret-payment-to-iran-isnt-quite-wha-1784775010?utm_source=recirculation&utm_medium=recirculation&utm_campaign=wednesdayPM
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
12,115
Tokens
Reagan, Bush, not even Carter would of paid ransom to Iran.

Without a doubt, Obama is the worst is the president we've ever had on so many different levels.

Everfresh called Redagger (a very solid poster and great longtime member of the Rx Community) a "Stupid Fucking Idiot" :):)


Can't make this shit up :):) friggin incomprehensible.


Muslim Born President ships $400 million worth of cash to Iran.

Shah Reza Pavlavi or whatever was a Leader we put in place. A Ruler WE (USA) inserted.

He was Our Boy.

Whatever deal existed at that time was relevant to then and not later.

"the Obama administration transferred the equivalent of $400 million to their central banks. It was then converted into other currencies, stacked onto the wooden pallets and sent to Iran on board a cargo plane. "


How Much other $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ our Muslim-Born President has hipped to other Muslim Countries?

I believe that Hillary shipped pallets containing $500,000,000 (500 Million) to Pakistan...

...to pay for whatever expenses the Pakistani ISI would incur in feeding and housing Osama Bin-Laden (when we had "no idea where he was" :):)) and to pay for arming The Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan.

You'd think, $500 Million, that amount would be sufficient to just Wipe Pakistan off of the Map after getting as many Non-Crazies plus Women & Kids we could manage....out of the Country.

Telling The ISI that we was taking them to DisneyWorld for a weekend then bringing them all back then just..

Boom.

Same Deal on Iran. Surely 400 Million could have bought the ability to clean up that section of the canvas as well.



Key Questions: Whats with the Obama Administration keeping this deal, this payment so much of the "downlow"...

The Obama administration has refused to disclose how it paid any of the $1.7 billion, despite congressional queries, outside of saying that it wasn’t paid in dollars.

is this "Executive Privileged?" He is able to do this?

Why the Hush Hush unwillingness to co-operate with THE US CONGRESS

if all is on the Up and Up?

and 2nd part of Key Questions:

How much Money will it come out The Muslim-Born President gave to other Muslims?


Muslim Countries that fund the very Terror Groups our Politicians claim to be so against?



Obama and The Powers that Be Bitch Punk'd the American People far harder than ever before, in all of History of USA.

No Politician ever fucked the American People worse.


History will show this to be True.


and Hillary would be a continuation of that.



"WE" (American People) became Braindead Sheeple though. We were such an easy mark.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
And you know Iran sent this money straight to Kingkhan's Hizb'Allah allies so they could stir up more Shit in Syria and Lebanon.
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
12,115
Tokens
And you know Iran sent this money straight to Kingkhan's Hizb'Allah allies so they could stir up more Shit in Syria and Lebanon.

Damn Straight.

So WHO winds up actually funding this Evil?

US.

USA.



Its why I say whatever comes, we deserved that fate.


I Defy any one to debate that, successfully.

We laid down and let a Muslim-Born Puppet of Powers that want to accomplish what they do...

completely walk all over us.

Actually managing to be the source of $$$$ for the worst threat(s) this country and the world have ever faced.



Maybe "We" are The Devil. As certain belief systems say...."USA is Satan". Yes...their ACTIONS point to THEM being The Devil but our own stupidity and thus our very own government funding this Terror...

....one can see how that could, conceivably, at least QUALIFY us a possibly being The Actual Devil. Like.....at the least "In His Service".
 

New member
Joined
Apr 20, 2000
Messages
3,293
Tokens
I hope Obama is gone in November. We need Trump so we can go to war. With war, we have jobs making bombs, nurses caring for our wounded soliders. Trump can build a wall around Ukraine so Russia doesn't get in. Go to school to be a bricklayer. Jobs for the future
 

RX Senior
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
3,511
Tokens
Everfresh called Redagger (a very solid poster and great longtime member of the Rx Community) a "Stupid Fucking Idiot" :):)


Can't make this shit up :):) friggin incomprehensible.


Muslim Born President ships $400 million worth of cash to Iran.

Shah Reza Pavlavi or whatever was a Leader we put in place. A Ruler WE (USA) inserted.

He was Our Boy.

Whatever deal existed at that time was relevant to then and not later.

"the Obama administration transferred the equivalent of $400 million to their central banks. It was then converted into other currencies, stacked onto the wooden pallets and sent to Iran on board a cargo plane. "


How Much other $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ our Muslim-Born President has hipped to other Muslim Countries?

I believe that Hillary shipped pallets containing $500,000,000 (500 Million) to Pakistan...

...to pay for whatever expenses the Pakistani ISI would incur in feeding and housing Osama Bin-Laden (when we had "no idea where he was" :):)) and to pay for arming The Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan.

You'd think, $500 Million, that amount would be sufficient to just Wipe Pakistan off of the Map after getting as many Non-Crazies plus Women & Kids we could manage....out of the Country.

Telling The ISI that we was taking them to DisneyWorld for a weekend then bringing them all back then just..

Boom.

Same Deal on Iran. Surely 400 Million could have bought the ability to clean up that section of the canvas as well.



Key Questions: Whats with the Obama Administration keeping this deal, this payment so much of the "downlow"...

The Obama administration has refused to disclose how it paid any of the $1.7 billion, despite congressional queries, outside of saying that it wasn’t paid in dollars.

is this "Executive Privileged?" He is able to do this?

Why the Hush Hush unwillingness to co-operate with THE US CONGRESS

if all is on the Up and Up?

and 2nd part of Key Questions:

How much Money will it come out The Muslim-Born President gave to other Muslims?


Muslim Countries that fund the very Terror Groups our Politicians claim to be so against?



Obama and The Powers that Be Bitch Punk'd the American People far harder than ever before, in all of History of USA.

No Politician ever fucked the American People worse.


History will show this to be True.


and Hillary would be a continuation of that.



"WE" (American People) became Braindead Sheeple though. We were such an easy mark.


Everfresh has been calling people names for years. It's about all he has left since being permanently banned. I've called him on it a few times. With everfresh, you are dealing with a frustrated old man who wants to be an frustrated old woman. He absolutely HATES anything good about the United States. Sad really.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
15,087
Tokens
Fuck it...not like $400 million not needed SOMEWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES for
some really important need.

Obama doesn't care.......only FOOLS think he does.
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
12,115
Tokens
Fuck it...not like $400 million not needed SOMEWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES for
some really important need.

Obama doesn't care.......only FOOLS think he does.

19 Trillion Dollars In Debt, USA, and we send pallets of cash....400 Million to...

fucking savage cockroaches.



"naturally."
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,828
Messages
13,573,630
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com