I rate them as "excellent."
The annual fee is very reasonable.
Their best bets this year are hitting about 74% winners and that is with 49 selections so far. These are given by Friday of each week.
Last year's selections were only marginal. They just about covered the juice with 52% winners for the season.
I have only been with them for 2 years.
They only make NFL selections, no colleges.
Hopefully, this helps.
The annual fee is very reasonable.
Their best bets this year are hitting about 74% winners and that is with 49 selections so far. These are given by Friday of each week.
Last year's selections were only marginal. They just about covered the juice with 52% winners for the season.
I have only been with them for 2 years.
They only make NFL selections, no colleges.
Hopefully, this helps.
2 mw.
Ive been checking them out and must say I am impressed with their systems. But they have so many which could create conflicting plays. Which ones would you recommend playing? Are the best bets the only ones that are consistent? I notice they highlite which ones are strong plays and this past week they went 5-2. Is this how you play them?
Thank you!
Ive been checking them out and must say I am impressed with their systems. But they have so many which could create conflicting plays. Which ones would you recommend playing? Are the best bets the only ones that are consistent? I notice they highlite which ones are strong plays and this past week they went 5-2. Is this how you play them?
Thank you!
Yes. They do have a lot of systems or methods for predicting games.
Yes. They can be conflicting.
However, I only use their Best Bets to get the cream of the crop for each of their systems. These can be conflicting too. But then they would cancel each other out and I would not wager on the game if they conflict.
I also use their UPM which gives a percentage for the games based on the matchups. Anything at 60% or above, deserves a play.
So far this year, these have made excellent plays.
Hopefully, the above helps.
Yes. They can be conflicting.
However, I only use their Best Bets to get the cream of the crop for each of their systems. These can be conflicting too. But then they would cancel each other out and I would not wager on the game if they conflict.
I also use their UPM which gives a percentage for the games based on the matchups. Anything at 60% or above, deserves a play.
So far this year, these have made excellent plays.
Hopefully, the above helps.
That 52% mentioned was what I played with them. I gave too much weight to their totals. I believe that their best bets were higher. They have discontinued their totals as a result of last year. However, I do not have an exact percentage for their best bets for 2003 but without the totals it was higher than 52%.
Sorry, I can't give you an exact figure for 2003.
Sorry, I can't give you an exact figure for 2003.
How is this staged? if it were staged i dont think 52% would be enticing to most people. i was just curious about this service and was looking for some info on it.
Pete Rose...... good luck to you buddy...Im in your corner. MLB allows racists and other criminals in the Hall but not a gambler because they are so high and mighty in the commisioner's office.Screw them! You should be in there!
Pete Rose...... good luck to you buddy...Im in your corner. MLB allows racists and other criminals in the Hall but not a gambler because they are so high and mighty in the commisioner's office.Screw them! You should be in there!
I havent signed up with 2 minute yet but they are only $99 for the year.I have been checking it out and it really isnt a tout service. I guess they use statistics to analyze the outcomes of the games and then its up to the player to decide which plays look the best. I may sign up just to play their Best Bets which seem to be the most consistent over the years.I need all the help I can get
