Trump welcomes foreign interference in US elections. Would accept intel from China and Russia re: political opponents

Search

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,808
Tokens
He thinks he's smart, maybe that's what mommy keeps telling him, but he's really just a genetically inferior intellectually challenged fucking idiot. With every word he utters, the world gets collectively dumber

Fact
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,469
Tokens
Such a brilliantly Trumptarded take on what happened.

In reality, his statement:

1. Got most Republican congressmen to admit that accepting/requesting 'oppo research' from a foreign adversary is ILLEGAL.

2. Got a response from the chairman of the FEC reminding the entire country that what what Trump said was ILLEGAL.

3. Contradicted his own appointed director of the FBI, Chris Wray, that was he said was ILLEGAL.

4. Shined a BIG BRIGHT LIGHT on his own questionable behavior from 2016. Basically posing to Americans "If trump is willing to accept help from a foreign adversary in 2020,... Was he willing to accept it in 2016?" That Trump tower meeting that Don Jr, Manafort, and Kush took with Russian lawyers seems a whole lot more relevant now.

5. Amplifies the call for an impeachment inquiry. You Trumptards, Trump included, think that the talk of conspiracy or obstruction goes away now that Barr whitewashed the Mueller report.

Congressional oversight is a bitch and its going to drag on, and on, and on, and on, and on.... right up until election day 2020

You're flat retarded.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,469
Tokens
In 2016, the Clinton Campaign and DNC paid for a dossier written by a foreigner named Christopher Steele, a retired MI6 intelligence agent from Great Britain.

The information in this dossier came directly from the Kremlin.

These are all facts. Yet the idiot who created this thread is blissfully unaware of them.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
Brags about a hypothetical question, but doesnt do it.... Democrats actually go out of their way to do it, and, meh

The Mueller report contradicts this statement. Republicans have always been the best at projecting their own fears/secrets/crimes.

How many anti-homo Republican congressman have been caught fucking men?

Remember when Obama was abusing executive powers? You don't hear about that much anymore either. Can't wait until a dem takes the White House and declares climate change a national emergency.

Child-sex ring operating out of a pizza place? John Podesta? Oh yeah, that really did happen, but it was someone (George Nader) connected to the Trump campaign. Also Trump's labor secretary helped secure a sweatheart deal for another one of Trumps pedo-friends Jeffrey Epstein.

Project Project Project.

You trumptards are so fucking thirsty that you'll drink down whatever the president says. The guy is a con that is enriching himself and his family via the office of the president.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
He thinks he's smart, maybe that's what mommy keeps telling him, but he's really just a genetically inferior intellectually challenged fucking idiot. With every word he utters, the world gets collectively dumber

Fact

Hurry up and fucking die already you piece of shit nazi scum
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens

Then call your congressmen to investigate and indict her. But bringing this up every time someone accuses the President of a crime makes you sound like a toddler screaming at the other "...but but but!!! SHE DID IT FIRST!! WAAAAAA"

When asked to distinguish himself between Nixon? "He left. I don't leave." Ya know, I think a better response would have been: "He was guilty. I'm innocent." But he didn't say that, because he knows he not innocent. But instead he said "Not leaving" Is he planning to stay if he loses 2020? Will he stay beyond 2024 if he wins re-election?

I suppose you guys are cool with Dictator Don if he decides to emulate his buddy Putin to be the forever-President?
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
The question was stupid as fuck and the response should have been, Sorry George, I'll not entertain hypotheticals. Next question."
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
The question was stupid as fuck and the response should have been, Sorry George, I'll not entertain hypotheticals. Next question."

I'll give you that, it was a stupid question that was EASILY answered -- you gave a great example of how it should have been answered.

It was about as bad as the Hillary Clinton interview where she couldn't give a straight answer on lying.


PELLEY: Some people are going to call that wiggle room that you just gave yourself "always tried to." Jimmy Carter said, "I will never lie to you."

CLINTON: You're asking me to say, "have I ever?" I don't believe I ever have. I don't believe I ever have. I don't believe I ever will. I am going to do the best I can to level with the American people.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...ly_deny_she_will_never_lie_to_the_public.html

Clinton's response back then and Trump's response a couple days ago simply do not pass the smell test.

Instead of Trump saying "No hypotheticals" he goes into a whole diatribe about how everyone does it, that's the way the world works, and that the LAW IS DIFFERENT FOR HIM because he's Americas DICKtator
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
The Mueller report contradicts this statement. Republicans have always been the best at projecting their own fears/secrets/crimes.

How many anti-homo Republican congressman have been caught fucking men?

Remember when Obama was abusing executive powers? You don't hear about that much anymore either. Can't wait until a dem takes the White House and declares climate change a national emergency.

Child-sex ring operating out of a pizza place? John Podesta? Oh yeah, that really did happen, but it was someone (George Nader) connected to the Trump campaign. Also Trump's labor secretary helped secure a sweatheart deal for another one of Trumps pedo-friends Jeffrey Epstein.

Project Project Project.

You trumptards are so fucking thirsty that you'll drink down whatever the president says. The guy is a con that is enriching himself and his family via the office of the president.
Mueller who?
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
Mueller who?

The guy who lead the investigation into Trump campaign conspiracy with Russian govt, Russian interference in 2016 election, and the guy who cited 11 different instances of obstruction of justice by the president.

You know, the guy who put out a report that will lead to Trump's impeachment and incarceration. Maybe Trump will pull a Reagan and plead Alzheimers, but there is so much evidence of him obstruction in plain-view I doubt it will work.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
2,337
Tokens
The guy who lead the investigation into Trump campaign conspiracy with Russian govt, Russian interference in 2016 election, and the guy who cited 11 different instances of obstruction of justice by the president.

You know, the guy who put out a report that will lead to Trump's impeachment and incarceration. Maybe Trump will pull a Reagan and plead Alzheimers, but there is so much evidence of him obstruction in plain-view I doubt it will work.

I'd LOVE to see a lawyer take that nonsense before a judge.
Yeah, Trump made a mean tweet about Sessions, your honor! face)(*^%
Your honor, Trump had a conversation with a lawyer about an event that never happened. :think2:
Anyone who attempts to prosecute Trump for ANY of those 11 ridiculous conclusions is going to be laughed right out of court. Judge would be like....:pointer:
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
Anyone who attempts to prosecute Trump for ANY of those 11 ridiculous conclusions is going to be laughed right out of court.

Except for the 500+ current and former Federal Prosectors say otherwise...

Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.

https://medium.com/@dojalumni/statement-by-former-federal-prosecutors-8ab7691c2aa1
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,826
Tokens
The House Dems are practicing McCarthyism. Nothing more, nothing less.

ding-donger is too young, dumb and ignorant to know what McCarthyism is.

We can only hope the GOP treats the next Dem president with the same level of disdain, resisting and obstructing at every turn.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
ding-donger is too young, dumb and ignorant to know what McCarthyism is.

We can only hope the GOP treats the next Dem president with the same level of disdain, resisting and obstructing at every turn.
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]The only bigger clowns than the House Dems are the people who put them in office.[/FONT]
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,469
Tokens
Then call your congressmen to investigate and indict her. But bringing this up every time someone accuses the President of a crime makes you sound like a toddler screaming at the other "...but but but!!! SHE DID IT FIRST!! WAAAAAA"

I don't really care if she's indicted.

What you're too stupid to realize is that my posts are about your hypocrisy.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,344
Messages
13,459,225
Members
99,469
Latest member
herbalinfusion
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com