i will go on the record as saying im going to start fading the "line is holding strong, sharps are playing this ......." stuff.......these are all based on consensus, and "in the know" type thinking....and ck's sharps are on balt has basically seen a shitty team like chisox go blow them up for 5 in the first.......i have sat on sidelines watching lots of those plays....and theya re no better than 50% , and if we checked ...id bet they are less.......this sharp shit is stupid......ck handicaps well enough to win, and his plays are def solid, even the ones that lose................but the other, making plays based on steam and sharps....well that justs eems like formula for losing....unless u think majority is often right.,
I will let CK answer for himself, but I do have some thoughts on the subject. To keep from getting too wordy, here are my thoughts in bullet form:
(1) Generally speaking, I agree that "steam" plays, "sharp" plays and "in the know plays" are rarely valuable. When people post plays like these, they usually do not know what they are talking about. But with CK it is different.
(2) CK gave a great explaination of what he plays, how he plays it and where his info comes from. This was probably about a year ago that I had the priviledge of reading it. I won't divulge those answers unless CK gives me permission to do so. But I instantly knew that CK was indeed different than 99% of the people claiming to know what the "sharps" were doing and claiming to have "inside info".
(3) CK's SIP plays are 6~2 (75%) this baseball season. Of those loses, one of the loses appeared to be a flukey loss and the other was just simply a bad loss. So in my mind, his SIP plays are more like 7~1 (88%). Take that for whatever it is worth.
(4) I could tell you exactly what percentage his other plays are hitting for (sorry CK, I have been tracking you buddy!) but I won't. But I will say that he's doing better than 50%.
Just my 2-cents :thumbsup: