Thoughts on the Use of Steroids...

Search

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
When I look at the size of some of these athletes in all of our favorite sports, I am SURE that more of them are using steroids than at any other time before..

In fact, since steroids give a person a considerable advantage, if I were competing for the type of money they make, I would definitely have to take them in order to compete on a level playing field...

My guess is that the % of professional athletes using them is far higher than anyone can imagine, maybe more than 50%...

Don't you guys agree?

THE SHRINK
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
It was way above 50% Shrink IMO...but if you look at certain well know EX SLUGGERS , they have Shrunk back down over the past year, no coincidence either!!!

I will list players who's stats have plummeted since the 'juice free' zone was implied...

Sammy Sosa, Jason Giambi, Chipper Jones, Jeff Bagwell, Shawn Green, Ryan Klesko, Carl Everett, Nomar Garciaparra, Brian Giles, Garret Anderson, these are off he top of my head...they all just didn't get old overnight...

LOL- meanwhile Barry Bonds approaching 40, still kicking ass.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,515
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Journeyman:
It was way above 50% Shrink IMO...but if you look at certain well know EX SLUGGERS , they have Shrunk back down over the past year, no coincidence either!!!

I will list players who's stats have plummeted since the 'juice free' zone was implied...

Sammy Sosa, Jason Giambi, Chipper Jones, Jeff Bagwell, Shawn Green, Ryan Klesko, Carl Everett, Nomar Garciaparra, Brian Giles, Garret Anderson, these are off he top of my head...they all just didn't get old overnight...

LOL- meanwhile Barry Bonds approaching 40, still kicking ass.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

The greatest thing about the Internet (and Internet forums) is the free flow of information. The worst thing about the Internet (and Internet forums) is the free flow of MISinformation. You imply that all these players are using steroids because of their "plummeting" stats?

You probably have a case with Sosa, Giambi, Bagwell, Klesko. But I'm not sure about the other players.

Nomar? In 2002 (156 games), he hit .310 with 24 homers. In 2003 (156 games), he hit .301 with 28 homers. In 2004 (24 games), he is hitting .306 with 3 homers. Seems like steady production to me.

Garret Anderson? In 2002 (158 games), he hit .306 with 29 homers. In 2003 (159 games), he hit .315 with 29 homers. In 2004 (43 games), he is hitting .320 with 7 homers. Seems like steady production to me! By the way, he is dealing with inflammatory arthritis this year. I think .320 is pretty damn good for a guy with arthritis.

Chipper? Other than 1997 (when he hit .295), he hasn't hit under .300 since 1995. This year, he is hitting .208! So you're going to blame this drop on steroids? I don't think steroids can drop (or boost) a player's batting average by 100 points. This is simply a terrible year for Chipper, lots of good players have these fluke-seasons once or twice during their careers. Cal Ripken hit .323 (34 homers) in 1991. But in 1992, Ripken only hit .251 (14 homers).

Chipper has also been dealing with a hamstring injury. Oh, but everybody is going to blame that injury on steroids! Funny. Chipper's having a crappy year because he isn't using steroids, but Chipper is having injury problems because he *is* using steroids!?!? Can't have it both ways.

Shawn Green, Giles, Everett? Who knows. Not every player who has 2-3 great seasons is destined to have a great career. Dave Kingman had some good seasons. So did Rob Deer and Cecil Fielder. What about Roger Maris? He hit 61 homers in 1961. Other than that, his next best seasons were 39 and 33 homers. Do you think Roger Maris used steroids in 1961?

Shawn Green has only hit over .300 once in his career (1999, .309). He had some good seasons when he first came to Los Angeles, but maybe the pitchers-park of Los Angeles is finally catching up to him? After hitting a combined 91 homers in 2001 and 2002, maybe more teams are pitching around Green (it isn't as though the Dodgers have surrounded Green with protection in the lineup).

Giles is a career .301 hitter. Last two years, he hit .298 and .299. This year, he is hitting .291 and 14 homers. In his best year, Giles hit 39 homers. So his power hasn't declined too much.

Carl Everett? You have GOT to be kidding. He is a major head-case. There could be 128 different reasons for his inconsistent performance from year to year. Since 1993, Everett has played for SEVEN different teams. There is probably a reason for that, don't you think? Everett is crazy!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
60
Tokens
Nutrition and exercise science is so much improved in this day and age. I don't think enough people understand that.

Middle infielders are now as strong as some of the greatest power hitters in earlier eras. Everyone has a personal trainer and the science of nutrition and supplements today is incredible. The same can be said in football. Look at defensive lineman now that are as fast as wide receivers use to be.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
Funk Money- that was a broad list, of course some may not use...I listed players whose POWER NUMBER WERE WAY OFF. Not batting avg....POWER IN BASEBALL IS DOWN....and all the players I listed are considerably way off...no coincidence...I could counter argue , but I'm not up to it...
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
807
Tokens
That guy who ran BALCO is nothing compared to the mad scientists over in Germany. Designer-undetectable steroids are here to stay.

By the way there is not test for HGH growth hormone because your body makes it anyway.
 

SSI

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,040
Tokens
i believe HGH is the choice for most,,, Jman, do some research on what HGH is and where it comes from... weight training alone can turn a 20 homer man into a 40 homer man, if done properly and consistently but they need the extra juice to get into the 60's... sammy is definately the classic example of getting off roids, he doesnt have the acne that he had a couple years ago, lot of tell-tell signs other than weight loss.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Tokens
I think it'd be cool to have an "any drug goes Olympics"......

Take any drug before you compete, from steroids, coke, speed, pcp....you name it....

Would certainly make boxing or wrestling more interesting knowing that pcp would give them some added rage and the strength of ten men...

Just a thought...
dance.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,515
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Journeyman:
Funk Money- that was a broad list, of course some may not use...I listed players whose POWER NUMBER WERE WAY OFF. Not batting avg....POWER IN BASEBALL IS DOWN....and all the players I listed are considerably way off...no coincidence...I could counter argue , but I'm not up to it...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Not to beat a dead horse, but using the stats in my post:

Nomar has 3 homers in 24 games. If he played 156 games at this pace (he played 156 games in 2002 and 2003), he would hit about 20 homers. In 2002, he hit 24 homers. In 2003, he hit 28 homers. So his power hasn't dropped much in 2004.

Same thing with Garret Anderson. Based on his 2004 pace, he would hit about 26 homers over 158 games. Anderson hit 29 homers in 2002 (158 games) and 29 homers in 2003 (159 games).

Chipper? Based on his 2004 pace, he would hit about 30 homers over 158 games. Chipper's homer totals the last 4 years:

2000, 36, 156 games
2001, 38, 159 games
2002, 26, 158 games
2003, 27, 153 games

As I said, you have a case with some players (Giambi, Sosa, Bagwell). But I don't think you should accuse players of using steroids when the facts clearly don't support your accusations. This is why rumors and gossip spread so easily. Lots of people simply assume every accusation is true (radio, TV, newspaper, Internet), even when the facts suggest otherwise.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
Marco...they pretty much already do, but that is a funny scenario ,lol...

FM- sorry I touched a nerve...a few guys in my list are obviously injured, sorry if I touched a nerve..
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,515
Tokens
As for steroids, I don't have a problem if athletes want to use them. Most of them aren't "normal" to begin with. They're genetic freaks who have special diets, special doctors, special exercise routines, etc. Even when they're not using steroids, they're using lots of legal drugs that most people don't use (and probably haven't even heard of).

If an athlete wants to use steroids, that is his/her choice. I know people are going to say "But that isn't fair! The athletes who use steroids have an unfair advantage over the athletes who don't use steroids!" That's true, but who cares? I didn't know it was a birth-right to play baseball and make $5 million/year. If the non-steroid players aren't good enough, I guess they'll have to get a normal job just like billions of other people in the world. Meanwhile, I'll be happy watching the steroid freaks hit 500-foot homers and run 4.2 in the 40-yard dash.

Article on the long-term effects of playing in the NFL:

Big men of the NFL pay for play

"Locker-room lore has it that the life expectancy of a typical pro football player is 55. Experts say that number is apocryphal, that it's more likely in the low to mid-60s. Still, that's a good 10 years shorter than the life expectancy of your typical pencil-necked geek or newsrag scribbler. Moreover, some retired players, especially linemen, spend their waning years as physical and mental wrecks."
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,515
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Journeyman:
Marco...they pretty much already do, but that is a funny scenario ,lol...

FM- sorry I touched a nerve...a few guys in my list are obviously injured, sorry if I touched a nerve..<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

It's all good. Wouldn't say that you "touched a nerve", but I'm a nutrition/exercise nut, so I don't like it when people instantly assume that athletes are using steroids simply because they're too big, too strong, etc.

There are lots of athletes who use steroids. But there are also lots of athletes who bust their ass in the weight-room, eat a VERY strict diet, don't drink anything except water, get 8 hours of sleep, etc.

Their reward for all this hard work? Fat newspaper reporters (who eat like pigs @ the pre-game buffet) accuse them of using steroids. Most of these reporters have probably never exercised in their entire lives, so of course they can't understand how a guy could gain 35 pounds of muscle since his teenage years.

It reminds me of the witchcraft trials. When people don't understand something, they instantly assume it must be black magic, illegal drugs, etc.

Journey, I'm sure you understand. After all, with your 19-inch guns, I'm sure you've been accused of using steroids from time to time.

1036316054.gif
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
As for using, I believe that no player should be allowed even if just common sense is used by a governing body to disallow. I think that common sense tells us the players on the juice have an edge in aspects of most sports. I do not think 50% use.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
Funk _ I agree its a shame...the honest, hard working players putting up great numbers, have to be questioned....
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
I wonder how many people that have responded or looked at this thread use steroids?
icon_rolleyes.gif
 

"The Real Original Rx. Borat"
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,882
Tokens
I heard that they make your balls into the shrink or somethings like that.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>I did them. Now I look like I have bitchtits. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>its called 'gyno' this seems to be every users #1 concern. it can be surgically removed though.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,832
Messages
13,573,790
Members
100,876
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com