This is what happens

Search

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,359
Tokens
oh, i don't know...maybe because SHE WAS JUST NOMINATED FOR SCOTUS?

Miers' Firm Received Large Windfall From Bush Campaign
'I've Never Seen That Kind of Money Spent on a Campaign Lawyer'
By FRANK BASS, AP
-----------------------------------------------------


WASHINGTON (Oct. 21) - George W. Bush's rising political fortunes provided a windfall for Harriet Miers' law firm.

Campaign records show Bush's Texas gubernatorial campaigns paid Miers a total of $163,000 in legal fees, most of it for work done during the future president's 1998 re-election bid.
.......................
Reports filed with the Texas Ethics Commission show that two payments of $70,000 were made to Miers' Locke, Purnell, Rain and Harrell firm in Dallas within a month of each other during the 1998 campaign. Another $16,000 in payments were made between March and December 1999.

The 1998 totals dwarfed the $7,000 Bush paid Miers' firm during his first run for governor in 1994, and are extremely large for campaign legal work in Texas, an expert said.

"I'm baffled," said Randall B. Wood, a partner in the Austin firm of Ray, Wood and Bonilla, and former director of Common Cause of Texas. "I've never seen that kind of money spent on a campaign lawyer. It's unprecedented."

......................

Dana Perrino, a White House spokeswoman, said the legal fees to Miers' firm were for routine campaign work, but declined to be more specific. Presidential aides declined to say whether Miers ever worked on researching Bush's past, such as his military record.

A spokeswoman for Locke, Liddell & Sapp - the firm created when Miers' office merged with another Dallas law firm - said it wouldn't provide details on the payments, citing attorney-client privilege.

Former Texas Land Commissioner Garry Mauro, a Democrat who was defeated handily by Bush in the 1998 campaign, said both the amount and the timing of the payments are curious. In late September, when Miers' firm received the first of two $70,000 payments, Mauro said he trailed Bush in the polls by 35 points.

"If they're spending that kind of money," said Mauro, now an Austin attorney who estimates he spent less than $20,000 on legal fees during the campaign, "they're spending it to protect themselves from something."
..................






Miers' Firm Received Large Windfall From Bush Campaign
'I've Never Seen That Kind of Money Spent on a Campaign Lawyer'
By FRANK BASS, AP
-----------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON (Oct. 21) - George W. Bush's rising political fortunes provided a windfall for Harriet Miers' law firm.

Campaign records show Bush's Texas gubernatorial campaigns paid Miers a total of $163,000 in legal fees, most of it for work done during the future president's 1998 re-election bid.
.......................
Reports filed with the Texas Ethics Commission show that two payments of $70,000 were made to Miers' Locke, Purnell, Rain and Harrell firm in Dallas within a month of each other during the 1998 campaign. Another $16,000 in payments were made between March and December 1999.

The 1998 totals dwarfed the $7,000 Bush paid Miers' firm during his first run for governor in 1994, and are extremely large for campaign legal work in Texas, an expert said.

"I'm baffled," said Randall B. Wood, a partner in the Austin firm of Ray, Wood and Bonilla, and former director of Common Cause of Texas. "I've never seen that kind of money spent on a campaign lawyer. It's unprecedented."

......................

Dana Perrino, a White House spokeswoman, said the legal fees to Miers' firm were for routine campaign work, but declined to be more specific. Presidential aides declined to say whether Miers ever worked on researching Bush's past, such as his military record.

A spokeswoman for Locke, Liddell & Sapp - the firm created when Miers' office merged with another Dallas law firm - said it wouldn't provide details on the payments, citing attorney-client privilege.

Former Texas Land Commissioner Garry Mauro, a Democrat who was defeated handily by Bush in the 1998 campaign, said both the amount and the timing of the payments are curious. In late September, when Miers' firm received the first of two $70,000 payments, Mauro said he trailed Bush in the polls by 35 points.

"If they're spending that kind of money," said Mauro, now an Austin attorney who estimates he spent less than $20,000 on legal fees during the campaign, "they're spending it to protect themselves from something."
..................




posted by Steve @ 2:02:00 PM

<!-- End .post -->
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,359
Tokens
and as far as i know yahoo works on a ratings system...the higher ratings a story gets, the higher profile it gets...
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,359
Tokens
maybe it's nothing...maybe it's something...we shall see...
 

Living...vicariously through myself.
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
8,456
Tokens
When something of substance comes from this then would be the time to run with it.Simple innuendo of illicit activity makes the story bias dummy.

Hows this one: LA Times (on Yahoo as well...its a big day for the libbys)

'Rudderless White House' Fights Miers' Choppy Seas

By Janet Hook and Maura Reynolds, Times Staff Writers


WASHINGTON — The Bush White House is not supposed to work like this.

The nomination of Harriet E. Miers to the Supreme Court has gotten off to a stumbling start that bears little resemblance to the president's first-term performance of pursuing major goals with discipline, focus and a united party behind him.

<TABLE style="CLEAR: left; MARGIN-TOP: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 5px; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #e9f0f2" width="10%" align=left><TBODY><TR><TD class=navmainsection align=middle>ADVERTISEMENT</TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle><!-- Ad Space: html.ng/tag=std&site=latimes&color=none&edition=newspaper&content=news&channel=print&adtype=cube&adsize=300x250 --><!-- img ad style --><!-- /Ad Space: html.ng/tag=std&site=latimes&color=none&edition=newspaper&content=news&channel=print&adtype=cube&adsize=300x250 --></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Nearly three weeks after President Bush chose Miers, her prospects for confirmation are clouded by opposition from conservative activists that is not waning, questions about her qualifications that remain unanswered, and lukewarm support even from strong Bush loyalists in the Senate.

White House officials and their allies had taken comfort from the fact that the loudest criticism of Miers' selection came from conservative activists outside the Capitol — not from the senators who would vote on the nomination.

But that security blanket began to fray this week as one of her most important Senate allies, Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), publicly rebuked Miers for giving what were called inadequate responses to a questionnaire, and disputed her account of what she told him in a private meeting.

Other Republicans are mostly withholding public judgment until she testifies at confirmation hearings that are scheduled to begin Nov. 7. But privately, some expressed surprise and unease at how poorly prepared the White House was for the skepticism Miers encountered. And they lamented that Bush had failed to find a nominee who would help uniteenergize a party demoralized by troubles in Iraq, high gas prices and criticism of Bush's response to Hurricane Katrina.

"What did he do in the middle of all this gloominess?" asked a senior Senate Republican aide who, like others, spoke on condition of anonymity to avoid antagonizing the White House. "He just blotted out the sun."

Some analysts and Republicans say the string of setbacks that have beset the nomination is a testament to how unhinged the White House has become amid legal and political problems, including the criminal investigation into the possible roles of two key administration aides — Karl Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby — in the unmasking of a covert CIA operative.

"You're seeing evidence of a profoundly disorganized and demoralized White House," said Ross Baker, a political scientist at Rutgers University who has also spent time working on the Senate staff. "If you are looking for evidence of a rudderless White House, the slipshod manner in which Harriet Miers' papers were prepared is really Exhibit A."

But White House officials insist all is business as usual, and Bush on Thursday again defended his selection of a "competent, strong, capable woman who shares the same judicial philosophy that I share."

And though he sounds less confident about Miers' prospects than before, conservative activist Jay Sekulow, chief counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice, nonetheless asserted Thursday, "I think we've turned a corner." Sekulow, who is advising the White House on the nomination, added, "It's become abundantly clear that the president is not going to withdraw this nominee and Harriet Miers is not going to withdraw her nomination. "

At this point, a critical calculation for the White House is not whether Miers will gain the support of the nation's conservative leaders, it is whether she can persuade a much smaller audience — the 100 members of the Senate who would vote on her confirmation.

Although senators of both parties have studiously avoided saying publicly how they would vote, aides say that at least for the moment, the vast majority of the chamber's Republicans are prepared to support her, however half-heartedly. So are a number of Democrats, almost certainly giving her the 51 votes she would need for confirmation.

The one thing that could sway that balance, Democrats and Republicans agree, is her performance during confirmation hearings.

"The only thing that's going to be fatal to this nomination is how she performs before the committee," said Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), a senior Judiciary Committee member.

"If she performs all right, then she's obviously going to be approved. But if she doesn't perform well, she probably won't be approved," Grassley said. "Between now and then, it doesn't really matters what happens."

Miers' performance in the hearings is especially important because, unlike Bush's first Supreme Court pick, John G. Roberts Jr., she does not begin the process with strong ties to many senators, nor has she been buoyed by early pronouncements of enthusiastic support.

Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), on the day of Roberts' selection, pronounced the nominee "brilliant" and one of the "best and the brightest." Weeks after Miers' nomination, Santorum remains noncommittal.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) this week called Miers' nomination a "challenge."

"People are asking so many questions, and the answers are not there yet," Frist said.
------------------------------------------------------------

Heres a good example.....LATIMES has an opposing view (in bold...very rare-however it is watered down by their qualifiers) but look what the headline is regardless.
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,359
Tokens
i wouldn't go around calling people "dummy", right after you post a story from Brent Bozel...lmao...
 

Living...vicariously through myself.
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
8,456
Tokens
I dont even know who the guy is but the meat of the article are the stats....can you prove them wrong? Will Al Franken do his own study? Will Matt Lauer submit his report anytime soon....LOL.

One more for you:

<CENTER>
capt.txrh11510211621.delay_indictment_txrh115.jpg
</CENTER>

<CENTER>With the face of Rep. Tom DeLay pasted over a photo of Napoleon, Chris Levack talks
with the media outside an Austin, Texas courthouse Friday, Oct. 21, 2005, where
DeLay made his first court appearance on money laundering and conspiracy charges.
(AP Photo/Eric Gay)
</CENTER>And roll..........cut.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,531
Messages
13,556,331
Members
100,631
Latest member
puss-feller
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com