If you truly believe this then you are either too young to have a clue or were living under a rock when Favre was THE man.
The Tampa Bay Bucs Defense dominated the decade in Favre's prime, and they all still talk about Favre.
Post season success is certainly a huge factor but each player is on the field for about 45% of the teams total plays - this is not the NBA - so I look at it like this - if Sanders played for Dallas - how many rings does Dallas win? alot - if Emmitt plays for Detroit how many rings? none - if Peyton played for NE, how many rings? ALOT - if Brady played for the Colts I would imagine no rings
I know for certain that not one GM would take Brady over Manning
I know for certain that not one GM would take Brady over Manning
From you, Yes.
... but not from a lot of other maggots who were hiding in the wings and are coming out of the woodwork now.
I see quite a few of them already. Nowhere to be seen all season, but now they're all here as if they knew all along.
For example cy1941, nick and stylez ... Nowhere to be seen until the Pats lose, but all of a sudden, the termites are out.
I know for certain that not one GM would take Brady over Manning[/QUOTE]
Not like I really care but thats impressive you know that for certain. I guess they're lying when they say they would take Brady over him in various polls? Or its close to 50/50 or whatever....
Yeah Peyton has always been such a great cold weather QB i'm sure he would be racking up the rings. (made a lot of $ off PManning btw so not really trying to diss him)
Not like I really care but thats impressive you know that for certain. I guess they're lying when they say they would take Brady over him in various polls? Or its close to 50/50 or whatever....
Yeah Peyton has always been such a great cold weather QB i'm sure he would be racking up the rings. (made a lot of $ off PManning btw so not really trying to diss him)
I'd like to see one GM - not a fan - not a commentator - but a GM whose job is on the line tell me he would take Brady over Manning - not one would - of course a fan or commentator can say it cuz Brady has more rings - I'm not knocking Brady - he's a top 10 QB of all time but Manning is arguably the best ever and ine of the best over all player ever - Brady is a great player with a greater career - but the perfect analogy is Emmitt to Sanders and Brady to Manning - Emmitt would'nt even know what the playoffs were if he played in Detroit
Don't make me look this up please cause I've had enough Pats for the day but they do those NFL polls on who a GM would take to start a team every year and they usually go like this...
if Brady had a better year previous than Manning, they say him
if Manning had a better year previous than Brady, they say him
Although they might be saying neither pretty soon and just saying Aaron Rodgers..
if Brady had a better year previous than Manning, they say him
if Manning had a better year previous than Brady, they say him
Although they might be saying neither pretty soon and just saying Aaron Rodgers..
